Kisoro District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Kisoro vary from 7 % in Muramba Sub-County to 95 % in Busanza Sub-County. Kisoro has 1,306 domestic water points which serve a total of 138,698 people – 131,338 in rural areas. 90 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kisoro has 1 piped schemes.
Access
42%
Rural Functionality
93%
Equity
156
Management
98%
Gender
95%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 366
Population 401
Population 819
Population 441
Population 569
Population 974
Population 629
Population 250
Population 766
Population 874
Population 680
Population 503
Population 373
Population 0
Population 154
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 2,629
Population Served 20,317
Population Served 2,922
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 10,789
Population Served 14,712
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 3,084
Population Served 11,904
Population Served 6,452
Population Served 17,183
Population Served 2,866
Population Served 14,776
Population Served 17,142
Population Served 4,077
Population Served 2,485
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 2,629
Population Served 20,317
Population Served 2,922
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 10,789
Population Served 14,712
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 3,084
Population Served 11,904
Population Served 6,452
Population Served 17,183
Population Served 2,866
Population Served 14,776
Population Served 17,142
Population Served 4,077
Population Served 2,485
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 119
Functional Sources 104
Functional Sources 53
Functional Sources 8
Functional Sources 58
Functional Sources 73
Functional Sources 11
Functional Sources 92
Functional Sources 68
Functional Sources 48
Functional Sources 104
Functional Sources 22
Functional Sources 83
Functional Sources 81
Functional Sources 64
Functional Sources 57
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUFUMBIRA | ||||||||
| 1 Southern Div | Urban | 6,712 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 Kirundo | Rural | 21,386 | 14,712 | 69% | 99% | - | - | 61 | 2 | 63 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Muramba | Rural | 43,796 | 3,084 | 7% | 90% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 77 | 1 | 78 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 3 | 18 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Nyakabande | Rural | 29,690 | 2,866 | 10% | 96% | - | 100% | 7 | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 2 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Nyakinama | Rural | 23,548 | 6,452 | 27% | 91% | - | - | 5 | 2 | 7 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 | 1 | 31 | 27 | - | 7 | No |
| 6 RUBUGURI TC | Rural | 2,616 | 2,485 | 95% | 81% | - | - | 41 | 1 | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | 3 | - | - | No |
| 7 Nyundo | Rural | 15,698 | 14,776 | 94% | 79% | - | - | 51 | 13 | 64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Busanza | Rural | 21,386 | 20,317 | 95% | 99% | - | - | 86 | 20 | 106 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Bukimbiri | Rural | 18,429 | 2,629 | 14% | 97% | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 109 | 6 | 115 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Nyarubuye | Rural | 22,638 | 17,142 | 76% | 82% | - | - | 50 | 10 | 60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | - | 26 | 13 | - | 1 | No |
| 11 Chahi | Rural | 22,524 | 2,922 | 13% | 97% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 2 | 37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Murora | Rural | 22,979 | 11,904 | 52% | 96% | - | 100% | 26 | 2 | 28 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 5 | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 36 | 1 | 37 | 13 | - | 2 | No |
| 13 Nyabwishenya | Rural | 18,087 | 17,183 | 95% | 99% | - | - | 45 | 19 | 64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | - | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 | 1 | 31 | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Kanaba | Rural | 19,225 | 10,789 | 56% | 94% | - | - | 9 | 14 | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 27 | 6 | 33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 22 | 17 | 39 | - | - | - | No |
| 15 Nyarusiza | Rural | 36,175 | 4,077 | 11% | 98% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 6 | 65 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 17 | 22 | - | - | - | No |
| 16 Northern DIV | Urban | 6,484 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | 1,268 | 742 | 71 | Yes |
| Total | 331,373 | 138,698 | 42 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 438 | 64 | 502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 467 | 12 | 479 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 310 | 13 | 323 | 1,324 | 742 | 81 | No | |
| District | 331,373 | 138,698 | 42 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 438 | 64 | 502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 467 | 12 | 479 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 310 | 13 | 323 | 1,324 | 742 | 81 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee