Kisoro District
by July 26, 2024
The access rates in Kisoro vary from 7 % in Muramba Sub-County to 95 % in Busanza Sub-County. Kisoro has 1,345 domestic water points which serve a total of 140,174 people – 132,712 in rural areas. 50 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kisoro has 1 piped schemes.
Access
42%
Rural Functionality
96%
Equity
151
Management
97%
Gender
98%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 372
Population 408
Population 832
Population 448
Population 578
Population 990
Population 639
Population 254
Population 779
Population 888
Population 691
Population 511
Population 379
Population 0
Population 156
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 2,635
Population Served 20,652
Population Served 2,934
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 10,801
Population Served 14,718
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 3,108
Population Served 11,916
Population Served 6,458
Population Served 17,467
Population Served 2,878
Population Served 14,782
Population Served 17,742
Population Served 4,095
Population Served 2,527
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 2,635
Population Served 20,652
Population Served 2,934
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 10,801
Population Served 14,718
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 3,108
Population Served 11,916
Population Served 6,458
Population Served 17,467
Population Served 2,878
Population Served 14,782
Population Served 17,742
Population Served 4,095
Population Served 2,527
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 134
Functional Sources 135
Functional Sources 63
Functional Sources 8
Functional Sources 100
Functional Sources 73
Functional Sources 11
Functional Sources 106
Functional Sources 73
Functional Sources 53
Functional Sources 153
Functional Sources 29
Functional Sources 102
Functional Sources 95
Functional Sources 98
Functional Sources 62
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUFUMBIRA | ||||||||
| 1 Southern Div | Urban | 6,822 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 Kirundo | Rural | 21,739 | 14,718 | 68% | 92% | - | - | 60 | 6 | 66 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Muramba | Rural | 44,519 | 3,108 | 7% | 99% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 89 | - | 89 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1 | 18 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Nyakabande | Rural | 30,180 | 2,878 | 10% | 97% | - | 100% | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | 1 | 14 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Nyakinama | Rural | 23,936 | 6,458 | 27% | 93% | - | - | 4 | 3 | 7 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 31 | - | 31 | 27 | - | 7 | No |
| 6 RUBUGURI TC | Rural | 2,660 | 2,527 | 95% | 95% | - | - | 39 | 3 | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | - | 19 | 3 | - | - | No |
| 7 Nyundo | Rural | 15,957 | 14,782 | 93% | 94% | - | - | 59 | 6 | 65 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 | - | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Busanza | Rural | 21,739 | 20,652 | 95% | 98% | - | - | 110 | 3 | 113 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | - | 17 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Bukimbiri | Rural | 18,733 | 2,635 | 14% | 100% | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 123 | - | 123 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Nyarubuye | Rural | 23,011 | 17,742 | 77% | 92% | - | - | 59 | 7 | 66 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | 1 | 30 | 13 | - | 1 | No |
| 11 Chahi | Rural | 22,895 | 2,934 | 13% | 98% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 1 | 46 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Murora | Rural | 23,358 | 11,916 | 51% | 92% | - | 100% | 25 | 5 | 30 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 37 | - | 37 | 13 | - | 2 | No |
| 13 Nyabwishenya | Rural | 18,386 | 17,467 | 95% | 95% | - | - | 63 | 8 | 71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 | - | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 58 | - | 58 | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Kanaba | Rural | 19,542 | 10,801 | 55% | 98% | - | - | 21 | 2 | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | - | 39 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 40 | - | 40 | - | - | - | No |
| 15 Nyarusiza | Rural | 36,771 | 4,095 | 11% | 99% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 73 | 1 | 74 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 | - | 25 | - | - | - | No |
| 16 Northern DIV | Urban | 6,591 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | 1,268 | 742 | 71 | Yes |
| Total | 336,839 | 140,174 | 42 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 459 | 43 | 502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 497 | 3 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 339 | 2 | 341 | 1,324 | 742 | 81 | No | |
| District | 336,839 | 140,174 | 42 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 459 | 43 | 502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 497 | 3 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 339 | 2 | 341 | 1,324 | 742 | 81 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee