Ibanda District
by November 20, 2024
The access rates in Ibanda vary from 8 % in Nyabuhikye Sub-County to 95 % in Kicuzi Sub-County. Ibanda has 974 domestic water points which serve a total of 168,934 people – 103,364 in rural areas. 72 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Ibanda has 1 piped schemes.
Access
54%
Rural Functionality
96%
Equity
400
Management
92%
Gender
94%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 0
Population 491
Population 151
Population 0
Population 279
Population 382
Population 303
Population 186
Population 264
Population 296
Population 234
Population 306
Population 274
Population 312
Population 832
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served NWSC
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 8,640
Population Served 3,350
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 18,378
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 5,462
Population Served 8,604
Population Served 4,430
Population Served 1,803
Population Served 1,606
Population Served 18,144
Population Served 27,088
Population Served 3,150
Population Served 2,415
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served NWSC
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 8,640
Population Served 3,350
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 18,378
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 5,462
Population Served 8,604
Population Served 4,430
Population Served 1,803
Population Served 1,606
Population Served 18,144
Population Served 27,088
Population Served 3,150
Population Served 2,415
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 44
Functional Sources 37
Functional Sources 32
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 52
Functional Sources 112
Functional Sources 170
Functional Sources 32
Functional Sources 65
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 3
Functional Sources 9
Functional Sources 94
Functional Sources 186
Functional Sources 15
Functional Sources 11
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | Ibanda | ||||||||
| 1 Igorora TC | Urban | 6,933 | 3,350 | 48% | - | 95% | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 1 | 19 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Ishongororo | Rural | 17,220 | 8,640 | 50% | 94% | - | - | 6 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | - | 1 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | - | 15 | 13 | 110 | 22 | No |
| 3 Keihangara | Rural | 13,530 | 5,462 | 40% | 91% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 24 | 3 | 27 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Nyabuhikye | Rural | 21,254 | 1,606 | 8% | 90% | - | - | 4 | 1 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 4 | - | - | No |
| 5 Rushango TC | Urban | 4,585 | 2,415 | 53% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Nyamarebe | Rural | 19,099 | 18,144 | 95% | 97% | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 27 | 33 | - | 33 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 | - | 30 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kijongo | Rural | 9,057 | 8,604 | 95% | 93% | - | - | 12 | 1 | 13 | 16 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 34 | - | 34 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Ishongororo TC | Urban | 26,166 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 91% | - | 12 | 1 | 13 | 17 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 9 Rukiri | Rural | 28,514 | 27,088 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 34 | - | 34 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 148 | - | 148 | 1,699 | 87 | 58 | No |
| 10 Rwenkobwa TC | Urban | 3,578 | 3,150 | 88% | - | 100% | - | 6 | - | 6 | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Kikyenkye | Rural | 13,866 | 4,430 | 32% | 100% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 10 | - | 10 | 4 | - | 4 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Kicuzi | Rural | 19,345 | 18,378 | 95% | 99% | - | - | 33 | 1 | 34 | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 68 | - | 68 | 46 | - | - | No |
| 13 Kanyarugiri TC | Urban | 7,962 | 1,803 | 23% | - | 27% | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 8 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 191,109 | 115,897 | 61 | 97 | 88 | 0 | 111 | 6 | 117 | 99 | 7 | 106 | 48 | 4 | 52 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 356 | 12 | 368 | 1,762 | 197 | 80 | No | Ibanda MC |
| 1 Kagongo Div | Urban | 41,261 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 87% | - | 32 | 6 | 38 | 14 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 114 | 15 | 129 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 Bisheshe Div | Rural | 36,901 | NWSC | NWSC | 84% | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 4 | 27 | 3 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 2 | 8 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 3 Bufunda Div | Urban | 44,616 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 81% | - | 15 | 3 | 18 | 7 | - | 7 | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 7 | 24 | - | - | - | Yes |
| Total | 122,778 | 53,037 | 43 | 84 | 86 | 0 | 50 | 10 | 60 | 44 | 5 | 49 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 137 | 24 | 161 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 313,887 | 168,934 | 54 | 96 | 86 | 0 | 161 | 16 | 177 | 143 | 12 | 155 | 53 | 6 | 59 | 52 | 2 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 493 | 36 | 529 | 1,762 | 197 | 80 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee