Ntungamo District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Ntungamo vary from 48 % in Kitwe TC Sub-County to 95 % in Bwongyera Sub-County. Ntungamo has 2,239 domestic water points which serve a total of 393,949 people – 354,409 in rural areas. 371 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Ntungamo has 4 piped schemes.

Access

75^%

Rural Functionality

83^%

Equity

88

Management

77^%

Gender

82^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

RWS Rukoni West 387

RES Rukoni East 231

RTL Rubaare TC 407

NTN Ntungamo 288

IHN Ihunga 259

RWK Rweikiniro 280

NYK Nyakyera 228

BWN Bwongyera 255

KBT Kibatsi 456

NYB Nyabihoko 316

CDV Central DIV 614

RHM Ruhaama 256

KYN Kayonza 325

NGM Ngoma 135

RBR Rubaare 230

RGR Rugarama 232

ITJ Itojo 196

RTC Rwashamaire TC 579

EDV Eastern DIV 225

WDV Western DIV 868

KTC Kitwe TC 294

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 75 %

Rural Access 78 %

Urban Access 57 %

BWN Bwongyera 95 %

CDV Central DIV 55 %

EDV Eastern DIV 95 %

IHN Ihunga 95 %

ITJ Itojo 95 %

KBT Kibatsi 95 %

KTC Kitwe TC 48 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 95 %

NTN Ntungamo 95 %

NYB Nyabihoko 95 %

NYK Nyakyera 64 %

RBR Rubaare 68 %

RES Rukoni East 51 %

RGR Rugarama 60 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 65 %

RWS Rukoni West 95 %

WDV Western DIV 80 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 75 %

Rural Access 78 %

Urban Access 57 %

BWN Bwongyera 95 %

CDV Central DIV 55 %

EDV Eastern DIV 95 %

IHN Ihunga 95 %

ITJ Itojo 95 %

KBT Kibatsi 95 %

KTC Kitwe TC 48 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 95 %

NTN Ntungamo 95 %

NYB Nyabihoko 95 %

NYK Nyakyera 64 %

RBR Rubaare 68 %

RES Rukoni East 51 %

RGR Rugarama 60 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 65 %

RWS Rukoni West 95 %

WDV Western DIV 80 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 83 %

Urban Functionality 86 %

BWN Bwongyera 59 %

CDV Central DIV 87 %

EDV Eastern DIV 96 %

IHN Ihunga 85 %

ITJ Itojo 88 %

KBT Kibatsi 82 %

KTC Kitwe TC 73 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 81 %

NTN Ntungamo 85 %

NYB Nyabihoko 88 %

NYK Nyakyera 89 %

RBR Rubaare 85 %

RES Rukoni East 89 %

RGR Rugarama 85 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 71 %

RWS Rukoni West 86 %

WDV Western DIV 92 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
Kajara
1 Kibatsi	Rural	23,192	22,032	95%	88%	-	-	49	8	57	24	1	25	6	3	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	31	12	43	-	-	-	No
2 Rwashamaire TC	Urban	9,164	NWSC	NWSC	-	89%	-	20	2	22	1	-	1	1	3	4	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	27	1	28	-	-	-	Yes
3 Ihunga	Rural	18,215	17,304	95%	86%	-	-	114	6	120	19	2	21	-	3	3	5	2	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	13	25	-	-	-	No
4 Nyabihoko	Rural	26,134	24,827	95%	88%	-	50%	82	13	95	30	11	41	1	4	5	1	1	2	-	-	-	1	1	2	89	-	89	-	-	-	No
5 Bwongyera	Rural	23,645	22,463	95%	63%	-	-	28	12	40	21	13	34	2	6	8	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	10	16	-	-	-	No
Total		100,350	95,333	95	83	89	50	316	41	357	96	27	123	10	19	29	12	3	15	0	0	0	1	1	2	165	28	193	0	0	0	No
RUHAAMA
1 Kitwe TC	Urban	21,495	10,362	48%	-	73%	100%	5	-	5	9	5	14	9	5	14	1	1	2	1	-	1	-	-	-	5	-	5	-	-	-	No
2 Nyakyera	Rural	45,140	28,898	64%	89%	-	-	40	3	43	16	5	21	4	8	12	7	1	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	65	-	65	-	-	-	No
3 Rukoni East	Rural	28,057	14,406	51%	90%	-	-	21	-	21	11	1	12	10	-	10	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	6	20	-	-	-	No
4 Rweikiniro	Rural	43,670	28,589	65%	71%	-	-	32	-	32	26	3	29	13	26	39	20	12	32	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	8	-	-	-	No
5 Ntungamo	Rural	37,108	35,253	95%	87%	-	-	82	19	101	28	1	29	44	5	49	18	1	19	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	7	23	-	-	-	No
6 Itojo	Rural	26,586	25,257	95%	89%	-	-	92	10	102	17	5	22	8	5	13	4	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	40	1	41	-	-	-	No
7 Rukoni West	Rural	20,138	19,131	95%	87%	-	-	23	2	25	20	1	21	16	5	21	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	3	12	-	-	-	No
8 Ruhaama	Rural	30,433	NWSC	NWSC	67%	-	100%	21	1	22	11	18	29	9	15	24	6	-	6	-	-	-	2	-	2	22	2	24	-	-	-	Yes
Total		252,627	186,237	74	83	73	100	336	35	371	138	39	177	113	64	177	60	15	75	1	0	1	2	0	2	179	19	198	0	0	0	No
RUSHENYI
1 Ngoma	Rural	32,809	31,169	95%	81%	-	-	14	3	17	39	16	55	11	12	23	15	-	15	-	-	-	-	-	-	50	-	50	-	-	-	No
2 Rubaare TC	Urban	15,952	NWSC	NWSC	-	85%	-	2	-	2	3	2	5	4	1	5	4	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	4	-	-	-	Yes
3 Rugarama	Rural	37,108	22,375	60%	85%	-	-	20	-	20	32	3	35	8	6	14	9	4	13	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	3	24	-	-	-	No
4 Kayonza	Rural	32,922	NWSC	NWSC	84%	-	-	41	1	42	17	2	19	2	7	9	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	3	6	-	-	-	Yes
5 Rubaare	Rural	30,207	20,433	68%	85%	-	-	13	2	15	39	6	45	6	3	9	4	1	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
Total		148,998	95,931	64	83	85	0	91	6	97	131	29	160	31	29	60	38	5	43	0	0	0	0	0	0	84	6	90	0	0	0	No
NTUNGAMO MC
1 Eastern DIV	Urban	6,788	6,449	95%	-	96%	-	12	-	12	4	-	4	4	-	4	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	1	5	550	30	63	No
2 Western DIV	Urban	6,222	5,000	80%	-	92%	-	12	1	13	4	-	4	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
3 Central DIV	Urban	9,164	5,000	55%	-	87%	-	16	-	16	2	-	2	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	No
Total		22,174	16,448	74	0	92	0	40	1	41	10	0	10	5	3	8	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	11	2	13	550	30	63	No
District		524,149	393,949	75	83	86	80	783	83	866	375	95	470	159	115	274	112	23	135	1	0	1	3	1	4	439	55	494	550	30	63	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	4	3	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	1	0
Unknown/Not GFS	19	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Unknown/GFS	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	4	3	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	3	0
Surface Water Based/GFS	17	13	1	3	0	7	0	1	0	8	0
Total	45	22	3	3	0	7	0	8	0	12	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

75%

83%

88

77%

82%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

75^%

83^%

77^%

82^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population