Ntungamo District

by July 26, 2024

The access rates in Ntungamo vary from 48 % in Kitwe TC Sub-County to 95 % in Bwongyera Sub-County. Ntungamo has 2,359 domestic water points which serve a total of 407,672 people – 366,323 in rural areas. 612 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Ntungamo has 4 piped schemes.

Access

77^%

Rural Functionality

75^%

Equity

81

Management

81^%

Gender

90^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

RWS Rukoni West 393

RES Rukoni East 234

RTL Rubaare TC 414

NTN Ntungamo 293

IHN Ihunga 263

RWK Rweikiniro 285

NYK Nyakyera 232

BWN Bwongyera 259

KBT Kibatsi 463

NYB Nyabihoko 321

CDV Central DIV 624

RHM Ruhaama 260

KYN Kayonza 330

NGM Ngoma 137

RBR Rubaare 234

RGR Rugarama 236

ITJ Itojo 199

RTC Rwashamaire TC 588

EDV Eastern DIV 228

WDV Western DIV 882

KTC Kitwe TC 299

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 77 %

Rural Access 79 %

Urban Access 59 %

BWN Bwongyera 95 %

CDV Central DIV 58 %

EDV Eastern DIV 95 %

IHN Ihunga 95 %

ITJ Itojo 95 %

KBT Kibatsi 95 %

KTC Kitwe TC 48 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 95 %

NTN Ntungamo 95 %

NYB Nyabihoko 95 %

NYK Nyakyera 68 %

RBR Rubaare 69 %

RES Rukoni East 55 %

RGR Rugarama 60 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 67 %

RWS Rukoni West 95 %

WDV Western DIV 89 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 77 %

Rural Access 79 %

Urban Access 59 %

BWN Bwongyera 95 %

CDV Central DIV 58 %

EDV Eastern DIV 95 %

IHN Ihunga 95 %

ITJ Itojo 95 %

KBT Kibatsi 95 %

KTC Kitwe TC 48 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 95 %

NTN Ntungamo 95 %

NYB Nyabihoko 95 %

NYK Nyakyera 68 %

RBR Rubaare 69 %

RES Rukoni East 55 %

RGR Rugarama 60 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 67 %

RWS Rukoni West 95 %

WDV Western DIV 89 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 75 %

Urban Functionality 64 %

BWN Bwongyera 61 %

CDV Central DIV 72 %

EDV Eastern DIV 69 %

IHN Ihunga 72 %

ITJ Itojo 87 %

KBT Kibatsi 78 %

KTC Kitwe TC 14 %

KYN Kayonza NWSC

NGM Ngoma 78 %

NTN Ntungamo 78 %

NYB Nyabihoko 56 %

NYK Nyakyera 99 %

RBR Rubaare 76 %

RES Rukoni East 64 %

RGR Rugarama 88 %

RHM Ruhaama NWSC

RTC Rwashamaire TC NWSC

RTL Rubaare TC NWSC

RWK Rweikiniro 65 %

RWS Rukoni West 99 %

WDV Western DIV 85 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
Kajara
1 Kibatsi	Rural	23,560	22,382	95%	78%	-	-	53	13	66	19	6	25	6	4	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	31	8	39	-	-	-	No
2 Rwashamaire TC	Urban	9,309	NWSC	NWSC	-	86%	-	19	3	22	-	1	1	1	3	4	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	27	1	28	-	-	-	Yes
3 Ihunga	Rural	18,503	17,578	95%	72%	-	-	98	32	130	15	6	21	3	-	3	10	1	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	14	25	-	-	-	No
4 Nyabihoko	Rural	26,548	25,221	95%	56%	-	50%	71	32	103	15	26	41	1	4	5	1	2	3	-	-	-	1	1	2	46	43	89	-	-	-	No
5 Bwongyera	Rural	24,020	22,819	95%	61%	-	-	51	7	58	12	24	36	2	6	8	3	1	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	10	16	-	-	-	No
Total		101,940	96,843	95	66	86	50	292	87	379	61	63	124	13	17	30	15	4	19	0	0	0	1	1	2	121	76	197	0	0	0	No
RUHAAMA
1 Kitwe TC	Urban	21,836	10,380	48%	-	14%	100%	1	5	6	2	12	14	-	14	14	3	2	5	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	5	5	-	-	-	No
2 Nyakyera	Rural	45,856	31,404	68%	99%	-	-	51	-	51	24	-	24	12	2	14	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	65	-	65	-	-	-	No
3 Rukoni East	Rural	28,502	15,812	55%	64%	-	-	26	2	28	1	11	12	3	7	10	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	7	24	-	-	-	No
4 Rweikiniro	Rural	44,361	29,545	67%	65%	-	-	29	6	35	20	11	31	10	29	39	27	6	33	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	9	-	-	-	No
5 Ntungamo	Rural	37,696	35,811	95%	78%	-	-	98	13	111	25	5	30	32	13	45	16	5	21	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	15	27	-	-	-	No
6 Itojo	Rural	27,008	25,658	95%	87%	-	-	97	11	108	17	5	22	8	5	13	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	38	3	41	-	-	-	No
7 Rukoni West	Rural	20,457	19,434	95%	99%	-	-	28	-	28	22	1	23	22	-	22	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	19	-	-	-	No
8 Ruhaama	Rural	30,915	NWSC	NWSC	57%	-	100%	19	7	26	14	15	29	7	17	24	6	1	7	-	-	-	2	-	2	17	7	24	-	-	-	Yes
Total		256,631	192,786	75	80	14	100	349	44	393	125	60	185	94	87	181	70	14	84	1	0	1	2	0	2	177	37	214	0	0	0	No
RUSHENYI
1 Ngoma	Rural	33,329	31,663	95%	78%	-	-	16	2	18	38	17	55	8	15	23	16	-	16	-	-	-	-	-	-	48	2	50	-	-	-	No
2 Rubaare TC	Urban	16,205	NWSC	NWSC	-	68%	-	3	-	3	4	2	6	1	4	5	3	1	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	4	-	-	-	Yes
3 Rugarama	Rural	37,696	22,781	60%	88%	-	-	21	1	22	28	7	35	11	3	14	13	1	14	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	1	24	-	-	-	No
4 Kayonza	Rural	33,443	NWSC	NWSC	71%	-	-	42	8	50	13	9	22	1	8	9	6	1	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	1	6	-	-	-	Yes
5 Rubaare	Rural	30,685	21,233	69%	76%	-	-	10	6	16	36	10	46	8	3	11	5	1	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
Total		151,358	100,442	66	79	68	0	92	17	109	119	45	164	29	33	62	43	4	47	0	0	0	0	0	0	86	4	90	0	0	0	No
NTUNGAMO MC
1 Eastern DIV	Urban	6,896	6,551	95%	-	69%	-	7	5	12	2	2	4	5	1	6	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	1	5	550	30	63	No
2 Western DIV	Urban	6,321	5,650	89%	-	85%	-	11	3	14	5	-	5	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	1	7	-	-	-	No
3 Central DIV	Urban	9,309	5,400	58%	-	72%	-	15	3	18	1	1	2	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	No
Total		22,526	17,601	78	0	75	0	33	11	44	8	3	11	7	3	10	2	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	11	3	14	550	30	63	No
District		532,455	407,672	77	75	64	80	766	159	925	313	171	484	143	140	283	130	22	152	1	0	1	3	1	4	395	120	515	550	30	63	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	4	3	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	1	0
Unknown/Not GFS	19	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Unknown/GFS	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	4	3	1	0	0	0	0	3	0	3	0
Surface Water Based/GFS	17	13	1	3	0	7	0	1	0	8	0
Total	45	22	3	3	0	7	0	8	0	12	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

77%

75%

81

81%

90%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

77^%

75^%

81^%

90^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population