Arua District
by April 28, 2024
The access rates in Arua vary from 49 % in Dadamu Sub-County to 95 % in Vurra Sub-County. Arua has 1,659 domestic water points which serve a total of 432,606 people – 371,086 in rural areas. 212 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Arua has 4 piped schemes.
Access
76%
Rural Functionality
87%
Equity
51
Management
97%
Gender
73%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 235
Population 456
Population 3,505
Population 17,155
Population 609
Population 819
Population 1,540
Population 697
Population 1,272
Population 527
Population 103
Population 216
Population 621
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 33,030
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 24,212
Population Served 21,924
Population Served 28,018
Population Served 21,536
Population Served 25,980
Population Served 38,992
Population Served 33,648
Population Served 33,722
Population Served 55,752
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 54,273
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 33,030
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 24,212
Population Served 21,924
Population Served 28,018
Population Served 21,536
Population Served 25,980
Population Served 38,992
Population Served 33,648
Population Served 33,722
Population Served 55,752
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 54,273
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 129
Functional Sources Unknown
Functional Sources 80
Functional Sources 93
Functional Sources 108
Functional Sources 86
Functional Sources 85
Functional Sources 160
Functional Sources 129
Functional Sources 128
Functional Sources 212
Functional Sources Unknown
Functional Sources 237
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | ARUA M.C | ||||||||
| 1 Arua Hill | Urban | 23,734 | NWSC | NWSC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 River Oli | Urban | 55,579 | NWSC | NWSC | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| Total | 79,313 | 61,520 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | AYIVU |
| 1 Adumi | Rural | 39,477 | 33,030 | 84% | 84% | - | - | 100 | 14 | 114 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Ayivuni | Rural | 29,101 | 21,536 | 74% | 85% | - | - | 61 | 9 | 70 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 19 | - | 19 | 3 | 3 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Oluko | Rural | 49,615 | 33,722 | 68% | 88% | - | - | 44 | 11 | 55 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 67 | - | 67 | 9 | 3 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 3 | 7 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Manibe | Rural | 37,569 | 33,648 | 90% | 88% | - | - | 59 | 16 | 75 | 8 | - | 8 | 51 | 1 | 52 | 7 | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Dadamu | Rural | 52,716 | 25,980 | 49% | 79% | - | - | 33 | 15 | 48 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 43 | 3 | 46 | 2 | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Pajulu | Rural | 77,285 | 55,752 | 72% | 83% | - | - | 127 | 26 | 153 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 68 | 6 | 74 | 11 | 6 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Aroi | Rural | 31,248 | 21,924 | 70% | 96% | - | - | 60 | - | 60 | 6 | - | 6 | 26 | 1 | 27 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 317,011 | 225,591 | 71 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 484 | 91 | 575 | 38 | 11 | 49 | 298 | 13 | 311 | 34 | 23 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | VURRA |
| 1 Vurra | Rural | 57,129 | 54,273 | 95% | 93% | - | - | 163 | 17 | 180 | 12 | - | 12 | 55 | 2 | 57 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Logiri | Rural | 48,065 | 38,992 | 81% | 86% | - | - | 107 | 21 | 128 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 22 | 3 | 25 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Ajia | Rural | 35,065 | 24,212 | 69% | 84% | - | - | 34 | 3 | 37 | 4 | - | 4 | 40 | 12 | 52 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Arivu | Rural | 31,009 | 28,018 | 90% | 93% | - | - | 27 | 5 | 32 | 15 | - | 15 | 46 | 2 | 48 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1 | 18 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 171,268 | 145,495 | 85 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 331 | 46 | 377 | 44 | 1 | 45 | 163 | 19 | 182 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 567,592 | 432,606 | 76 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 815 | 137 | 952 | 82 | 12 | 94 | 461 | 32 | 493 | 53 | 23 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 8 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee