Budaka District

by December 13, 2019

The access rates in Budaka vary from 58 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Iki-Iki Sub-County. Budaka has 728 domestic water points which serve a total of 200,677 people – 179,028 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

81%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

55

Management

87%

Gender

78%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BDK Budaka 569
Budaka
Population 569
BTC Budaka TC 763
Budaka TC
Population 763
IKI Iki-Iki 697
Iki-Iki
Population 697
KCH Kachomo 584
Kachomo
Population 584
KDR Kaderuna 681
Kaderuna
Population 681
KKL Kakule 594
Kakule
Population 594
KMR Kameruka 566
Kameruka
Population 566
KMN Kamonkoli 698
Kamonkoli
Population 698
KTR Katiira 624
Katiira
Population 624
LYM Lyama 454
Lyama
Population 454
MGT Mugiti 776
Mugiti
Population 776
NBA Naboa 538
Naboa
Population 538
NNS Nansanga 507
Nansanga
Population 507

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 77 %

BDK Budaka 82 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 77 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,068
KCH Kachomo 94 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 87 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,080
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 74 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,894

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 77 %

BDK Budaka 82 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 77 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,068
KCH Kachomo 94 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 87 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,080
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 74 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,894

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural17,20116,20994%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural29,209NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural11,46710,89495%98%--314---37-37---------------No
 4 BudakaRural13,19810,80082%95%--9-9---27229---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural20,23017,62187%97%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 6 MugitiRural13,631NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban28,23521,64977%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 8 KatiiraRural19,25614,30674%96%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural14,82114,08095%93%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural22,71816,30072%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural17,74215,70088%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 12 NaboaRural16,5529,52758%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural22,17721,06895%91%--2332612348250----11---------No
Total 246,437200,67781938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No
District 246,437200,67781938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee