Budaka District

by January 22, 2020

The access rates in Budaka vary from 57 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Kakule Sub-County. Budaka has 728 domestic water points which serve a total of 200,884 people – 179,235 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

81%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

56

Management

87%

Gender

78%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BDK Budaka 573
Budaka
Population 573
BTC Budaka TC 768
Budaka TC
Population 768
IKI Iki-Iki 702
Iki-Iki
Population 702
KCH Kachomo 588
Kachomo
Population 588
KDR Kaderuna 686
Kaderuna
Population 686
KKL Kakule 598
Kakule
Population 598
KMR Kameruka 570
Kameruka
Population 570
KMN Kamonkoli 702
Kamonkoli
Population 702
KTR Katiira 628
Katiira
Population 628
LYM Lyama 457
Lyama
Population 457
MGT Mugiti 781
Mugiti
Population 781
NBA Naboa 542
Naboa
Population 542
NNS Nansanga 511
Nansanga
Population 511

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 76 %

BDK Budaka 81 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 76 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 94 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,100
KCH Kachomo 94 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 86 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,178
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 74 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 71 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 57 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,970

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 76 %

BDK Budaka 81 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 76 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 94 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,100
KCH Kachomo 94 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 86 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,178
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 74 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 71 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 57 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,970

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural17,32116,20994%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural29,413NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural11,54710,97095%98%--314---37-37---------------No
 4 BudakaRural13,29010,80081%95%--9-9---27229---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural20,37117,62187%97%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 6 MugitiRural13,726NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban28,43221,64976%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 8 KatiiraRural19,39114,30674%96%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural14,92414,17895%93%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural22,87716,30071%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural17,86615,70088%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 12 NaboaRural16,6679,52757%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural22,33221,10094%91%--2332612348250----11---------No
Total 248,157200,88481938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No
District 248,157200,88481938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee