Budaka District

by April 17, 2024

The access rates in Budaka vary from 58 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Kakule Sub-County. Budaka has 795 domestic water points which serve a total of 219,747 people – 198,122 in rural areas. 60 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

78%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

54

Management

82%

Gender

70%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
NBA Naboa 617
Naboa
Population 617
LYM Lyama 520
Lyama
Population 520
KMN Kamonkoli 800
Kamonkoli
Population 800
KMR Kameruka 649
Kameruka
Population 649
KDR Kaderuna 781
Kaderuna
Population 781
IKI Iki-Iki 799
Iki-Iki
Population 799
BDK Budaka 652
Budaka
Population 652
KCH Kachomo 670
Kachomo
Population 670
KKL Kakule 681
Kakule
Population 681
BTC Budaka TC 874
Budaka TC
Population 874
KTR Katiira 715
Katiira
Population 715
MGT Mugiti 889
Mugiti
Population 889
NNS Nansanga 581
Nansanga
Population 581

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 78 %
Rural Access 79 %
Urban Access 67 %

BDK Budaka 85 %
Budaka
Population Served 12,900
BTC Budaka TC 67 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,625
IKI Iki-Iki 90 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 22,806
KCH Kachomo 85 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,809
KDR Kaderuna 79 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 18,421
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 16,141
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 81 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,500
KTR Katiira 70 %
Katiira
Population Served 15,406
LYM Lyama 67 %
Lyama
Population Served 17,500
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 11,027
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 12,488

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 78 %
Rural Access 79 %
Urban Access 67 %

BDK Budaka 85 %
Budaka
Population Served 12,900
BTC Budaka TC 67 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,625
IKI Iki-Iki 90 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 22,806
KCH Kachomo 85 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,809
KDR Kaderuna 79 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 18,421
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 16,141
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 81 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,500
KTR Katiira 70 %
Katiira
Population Served 15,406
LYM Lyama 67 %
Lyama
Population Served 17,500
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 11,027
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 12,488

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 83 %

BDK Budaka 85 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 40
BTC Budaka TC 83 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 45
IKI Iki-Iki 97 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 84
KCH Kachomo 98 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 62
KDR Kaderuna 94 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 67
KKL Kakule 91 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 59
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 96
KMR Kameruka 97 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 63
KTR Katiira 89 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 49
LYM Lyama 93 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 55
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 34
NBA Naboa 81 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 35
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 46

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural19,71816,80985%98%--15-153-343-43112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural33,484NWSCNWSC92%--17-17---79382-44-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural13,14512,48895%98%--314---43-43---------------No
 4 BudakaRural15,13012,90085%85%--11112---29635---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural23,19118,42179%94%--17-171-149-49-44-11---------No
 6 MugitiRural15,626NWSCNWSC97%--4-4---29130---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban32,36821,62567%-83%-72921331233-22------5272861913No
 8 KatiiraRural22,07415,40670%89%--8-8-3341243-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural16,99016,14195%91%--19120---40444-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural26,04317,50067%93%--112---54357---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural20,33816,50081%97%--291305-529130---------------No
 12 NaboaRural18,97411,02758%81%--4-4---31334-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural25,42322,80690%97%-100%30-30213512531-11-1---------No
Total 282,504219,7477893835016571721351854927576218201120006392861913No
District 282,504219,7477893835016571721351854927576218201120006392861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee