Budaka District

by September 18, 2020

The access rates in Budaka vary from 56 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Kakule Sub-County. Budaka has 741 domestic water points which serve a total of 203,824 people – 182,175 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

80%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

57

Management

87%

Gender

78%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BDK Budaka 585
Budaka
Population 585
BTC Budaka TC 785
Budaka TC
Population 785
IKI Iki-Iki 717
Iki-Iki
Population 717
KCH Kachomo 601
Kachomo
Population 601
KDR Kaderuna 701
Kaderuna
Population 701
KKL Kakule 611
Kakule
Population 611
KMR Kameruka 582
Kameruka
Population 582
KMN Kamonkoli 718
Kamonkoli
Population 718
KTR Katiira 642
Katiira
Population 642
LYM Lyama 467
Lyama
Population 467
MGT Mugiti 798
Mugiti
Population 798
NBA Naboa 554
Naboa
Population 554
NNS Nansanga 521
Nansanga
Population 521

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 80 %
Rural Access 81 %
Urban Access 75 %

BDK Budaka 84 %
Budaka
Population Served 11,400
BTC Budaka TC 75 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 92 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,100
KCH Kachomo 92 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 86 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,921
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,483
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,000
KTR Katiira 72 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,900
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 56 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 11,205

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 80 %
Rural Access 81 %
Urban Access 75 %

BDK Budaka 84 %
Budaka
Population Served 11,400
BTC Budaka TC 75 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 92 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 21,100
KCH Kachomo 92 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 86 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,921
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,483
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 88 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,000
KTR Katiira 72 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,900
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 56 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 11,205

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural17,69316,20992%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural30,045NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural11,79511,20595%98%--314---37-37---------------No
 4 BudakaRural13,57611,40084%95%--9-9---27229---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural20,80917,92186%97%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 6 MugitiRural14,021NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban29,04321,64975%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 8 KatiiraRural19,80714,30672%96%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural15,24514,48395%94%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural23,36816,90072%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural18,24916,00088%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 12 NaboaRural17,0259,52756%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural22,81221,10092%91%--2332612348250----11---------No
Total 253,488203,82480938150146101561261851722539712191120003692861913No
District 253,488203,82480938150146101561261851722539712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee