Budaka District

by August 17, 2019

The access rates in Budaka vary from 58 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Iki-Iki Sub-County. Budaka has 728 domestic water points which serve a total of 200,386 people – 178,737 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

82%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

55

Management

87%

Gender

78%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BDK Budaka 566
Budaka
Population 566
BTC Budaka TC 758
Budaka TC
Population 758
IKI Iki-Iki 693
Iki-Iki
Population 693
KCH Kachomo 581
Kachomo
Population 581
KDR Kaderuna 677
Kaderuna
Population 677
KKL Kakule 590
Kakule
Population 590
KMR Kameruka 563
Kameruka
Population 563
KMN Kamonkoli 693
Kamonkoli
Population 693
KTR Katiira 620
Katiira
Population 620
LYM Lyama 451
Lyama
Population 451
MGT Mugiti 771
Mugiti
Population 771
NBA Naboa 535
Naboa
Population 535
NNS Nansanga 504
Nansanga
Population 504

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 82 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 77 %

BDK Budaka 82 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 77 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,935
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 88 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,991
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 89 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 75 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,824

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 82 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 77 %

BDK Budaka 82 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,800
BTC Budaka TC 77 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,935
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,209
KDR Kaderuna 88 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,621
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,991
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 89 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,700
KTR Katiira 75 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 72 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,527
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,824

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural17,09216,20995%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural29,024NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural11,39410,82495%98%--314---37-37---------------No
 4 BudakaRural13,11410,80082%95%--9-9---27229---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural20,10217,62188%97%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 6 MugitiRural13,544NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban28,05621,64977%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 8 KatiiraRural19,13414,30675%96%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural14,72713,99195%93%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural22,57416,30072%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural17,62915,70089%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 12 NaboaRural16,4479,52758%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural22,03720,93595%91%--2332612348250----11---------No
Total 244,874200,38682938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No
District 244,874200,38682938150145101551261850522527712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee