Budaka District

by October 24, 2021

The access rates in Budaka vary from 59 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Kakule Sub-County. Budaka has 775 domestic water points which serve a total of 213,093 people – 191,468 in rural areas. 49 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

81%

Rural Functionality

95%

Equity

51

Management

86%

Gender

85%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BDK Budaka 606
Budaka
Population 606
BTC Budaka TC 812
Budaka TC
Population 812
IKI Iki-Iki 742
Iki-Iki
Population 742
KCH Kachomo 622
Kachomo
Population 622
KDR Kaderuna 725
Kaderuna
Population 725
KKL Kakule 632
Kakule
Population 632
KMR Kameruka 603
Kameruka
Population 603
KMN Kamonkoli 742
Kamonkoli
Population 742
KTR Katiira 664
Katiira
Population 664
LYM Lyama 483
Lyama
Population 483
MGT Mugiti 826
Mugiti
Population 826
NBA Naboa 573
Naboa
Population 573
NNS Nansanga 540
Nansanga
Population 540

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 72 %

BDK Budaka 88 %
Budaka
Population Served 12,400
BTC Budaka TC 72 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,625
IKI Iki-Iki 94 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 22,300
KCH Kachomo 90 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,509
KDR Kaderuna 83 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,921
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,986
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 86 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,300
KTR Katiira 75 %
Katiira
Population Served 15,406
LYM Lyama 71 %
Lyama
Population Served 17,200
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 59 %
Naboa
Population Served 10,427
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 11,595

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 81 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 72 %

BDK Budaka 88 %
Budaka
Population Served 12,400
BTC Budaka TC 72 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,625
IKI Iki-Iki 94 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 22,300
KCH Kachomo 90 %
Kachomo
Population Served 16,509
KDR Kaderuna 83 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,921
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 14,986
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 86 %
Kameruka
Population Served 16,300
KTR Katiira 75 %
Katiira
Population Served 15,406
LYM Lyama 71 %
Lyama
Population Served 17,200
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 59 %
Naboa
Population Served 10,427
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 11,595

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 95 %
Urban Functionality 80 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KachomoRural18,30816,50990%98%--141153-341-41112------------No
 2 KamonkoliRural31,089NWSCNWSC92%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 3 NansangaRural12,20511,59595%93%--314---37-37---------------No
 4 BudakaRural14,04812,40088%98%--9-9---27229---------------No
 5 KaderunaRural21,53217,92183%94%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 6 MugitiRural14,508NWSCNWSC97%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 7 Budaka TCUrban30,05321,62572%-80%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 8 KatiiraRural20,49615,40675%95%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 9 KakuleRural15,77514,98695%97%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 10 LyamaRural24,18017,20071%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 11 KamerukaRural18,88416,30086%95%--2632932526127---------------No
 12 NaboaRural17,61710,42759%88%--314---25328-55------------No
 13 Iki-IkiRural23,60522,30094%98%-100%2332612348250----11---------No
Total 262,300213,09381958010016331661171854518563217192020005492861913No
District 262,300213,09381958010016331661171854518563217192020005492861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee