Bundibugyo District
by May 15, 2025
The access rates in Bundibugyo vary from 15 % in Mabere Sub-County to 95 % in Kasitu Sub-County. Bundibugyo has 1,573 domestic water points which serve a total of 223,347 people – 171,796 in rural areas. 44 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Bundibugyo has 20 piped schemes.
Access
70%
Rural Functionality
97%
Equity
158
Management
90%
Gender
92%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
MBY
Mbatya
Unknown
MbatyaPopulation 0
NGT
Ngite
Unknown
NgitePopulation 0
SND
Sindila
64
SindilaPopulation 64
BDG
Bundingoma
Unknown
BundingomaPopulation 0
NTT
Ntandi TC
Unknown
Ntandi TCPopulation 0
BRD
Burondo
Unknown
BurondoPopulation 0
TKW
Tokwe
Unknown
TokwePopulation 0
KGH
Kagughu
Unknown
KagughuPopulation 0
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
Unknown
Butamamitundu TCPopulation 0
BGT
Buganikire TC
Unknown
Buganikire TCPopulation 0
MRM
Mirambi
726
MirambiPopulation 726
KRM
Kirumya
694
KirumyaPopulation 694
BKN
Bukonzo
541
BukonzoPopulation 541
NTC
Nyahuka TC
1,363
Nyahuka TCPopulation 1,363
BST
Busunga TC
Unknown
Busunga TCPopulation 0
KGT
Kaghema TC
Unknown
Kaghema TCPopulation 0
MBR
Mabere
261
MaberePopulation 261
NDG
Ndugutu
201
NdugutuPopulation 201
HRG
Harugale
191
HarugalePopulation 191
BBK
Bubukwanga
141
BubukwangaPopulation 141
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
2,582
Bundibugyo TCPopulation 2,582
BSR
Busaru
588
BusaruPopulation 588
NGM
Ngamba
409
NgambaPopulation 409
NTT
Ntotoro
710
NtotoroPopulation 710
KSB
Kisuba
450
KisubaPopulation 450
KST
Kasitu
19
KasituPopulation 19
BBN
Bubandi
658
BubandiPopulation 658
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
70 %
Rural Access
70 %
Urban Access
71 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
78 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 11,586
BBN
Bubandi
46 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,900
BDG
Bundingoma
79 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,762
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,672
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,477
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,854
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,550
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 7,087
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
83 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,788
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,565
KGH
Kagughu
57 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
59 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
46 %
KisubaPopulation Served 10,200
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,369
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,825
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 8,118
NGM
Ngamba
84 %
NgambaPopulation Served 11,586
NGT
Ngite
40 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,453
NTC
Nyahuka TC
57 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
75 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 10,406
NTT
Ntandi TC
67 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
47 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
82 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
70 %
Rural Access
70 %
Urban Access
71 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
78 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 11,586
BBN
Bubandi
46 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,900
BDG
Bundingoma
79 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,762
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,672
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,477
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,854
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,550
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 7,087
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
83 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,788
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,565
KGH
Kagughu
57 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
59 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
46 %
KisubaPopulation Served 10,200
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,369
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,825
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 8,118
NGM
Ngamba
84 %
NgambaPopulation Served 11,586
NGT
Ngite
40 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,453
NTC
Nyahuka TC
57 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
75 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 10,406
NTT
Ntandi TC
67 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
47 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
82 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
97 %
Urban Functionality
97 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
100 %
BubukwangaFunctional Sources 80
BBN
Bubandi
100 %
BubandiFunctional Sources 42
BDG
Bundingoma
89 %
BundingomaFunctional Sources 25
BGT
Buganikire TC
100 %
Buganikire TCFunctional Sources 49
BKN
Bukonzo
100 %
BukonzoFunctional Sources 108
BRD
Burondo
100 %
BurondoFunctional Sources 54
BSR
Busaru
92 %
BusaruFunctional Sources 108
BST
Busunga TC
99 %
Busunga TCFunctional Sources 76
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
98 %
Bundibugyo TCFunctional Sources 118
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
100 %
Butamamitundu TCFunctional Sources 61
HRG
Harugale
98 %
HarugaleFunctional Sources 82
KGH
Kagughu
87 %
KagughuFunctional Sources 40
KGT
Kaghema TC
100 %
Kaghema TCFunctional Sources 8
KRM
Kirumya
100 %
KirumyaFunctional Sources 59
KSB
Kisuba
98 %
KisubaFunctional Sources 61
KST
Kasitu
94 %
KasituFunctional Sources 34
MBR
Mabere
100 %
MabereFunctional Sources 5
MBY
Mbatya
100 %
MbatyaFunctional Sources 4
MRM
Mirambi
100 %
MirambiFunctional Sources 91
NDG
Ndugutu
98 %
NdugutuFunctional Sources 48
NGM
Ngamba
100 %
NgambaFunctional Sources 77
NGT
Ngite
100 %
NgiteFunctional Sources 16
NTC
Nyahuka TC
91 %
Nyahuka TCFunctional Sources 72
NTT
Ntotoro
97 %
NtotoroFunctional Sources 61
NTT
Ntandi TC
97 %
Ntandi TCFunctional Sources 32
SND
Sindila
100 %
SindilaFunctional Sources 29
TKW
Tokwe
92 %
TokweFunctional Sources 83
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUGHENDERA | ||||||||
| 1 Harugale | Rural | 16,632 | 13,565 | 82% | 98% | - | - | 26 | 2 | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | 17 | - | 3 | No |
| 2 Mbatya | Rural | 5,396 | 800 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Ntandi TC | Urban | 7,215 | 4,812 | 67% | - | 97% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | - | 28 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mabere | Rural | 4,857 | 712 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Ngite | Rural | 6,152 | 2,453 | 40% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Kasitu | Rural | 3,546 | 3,369 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 17 | - | 17 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 30 | - | 5 | No |
| 7 Burondo | Rural | 7,215 | 6,854 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | - | 39 | 44 | - | 4 | No |
| 8 Ngamba | Rural | 13,819 | 11,586 | 84% | 100% | - | - | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | 52 | - | 7 | No |
| 9 Ntotoro | Rural | 13,819 | 10,406 | 75% | 97% | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 2 | 50 | 12 | - | 2 | No |
| 10 Sindila | Rural | 10,028 | 4,709 | 47% | 100% | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | - | 14 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Kagughu | Rural | 14,553 | 8,362 | 57% | 87% | - | - | 28 | 4 | 32 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | 47 | - | 10 | No |
| 12 Ndugutu | Rural | 11,985 | 8,118 | 68% | 98% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1 | 18 | 32 | - | 7 | No |
| 13 Bukonzo | Rural | 14,186 | 13,477 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 63 | - | 63 | 59 | - | 8 | No |
| 14 Butamamitundu TC | Urban | 2,935 | 2,788 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 49 | - | 49 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 132,338 | 92,012 | 70 | 97 | 99 | 0 | 172 | 6 | 178 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 23 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 349 | 5 | 354 | 234 | 0 | 38 | No | BWAMBA |
| 1 Busaru | Rural | 19,567 | 18,550 | 95% | 92% | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 95 | 8 | 103 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Nyahuka TC | Urban | 22,012 | 12,509 | 57% | - | 91% | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 54 | 6 | 60 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Tokwe | Rural | 15,531 | 12,789 | 82% | 92% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | 7 | 79 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mirambi | Rural | 14,553 | 13,825 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 64 | - | 64 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Bubukwanga | Rural | 14,920 | 11,586 | 78% | 100% | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | - | 67 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Bubandi | Rural | 15,042 | 6,900 | 46% | 100% | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 | - | 32 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kisuba | Rural | 22,257 | 10,200 | 46% | 98% | - | - | 15 | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kirumya | Rural | 14,797 | 8,771 | 59% | 100% | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | - | 43 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Bundingoma | Rural | 5,992 | 4,762 | 79% | 89% | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 3 | 15 | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Buganikire TC | Urban | 2,813 | 2,672 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Bundibugyo TC | Urban | 24,947 | 20,672 | 83% | - | 98% | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 104 | 2 | 106 | 145 | 50 | 14 | No |
| 12 Busunga TC | Urban | 7,460 | 7,087 | 95% | - | 99% | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 1 | 44 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kaghema TC | Urban | 5,396 | 1,012 | 19% | - | 100% | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 185,287 | 131,335 | 71 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 161 | 2 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 25 | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 733 | 27 | 760 | 204 | 50 | 22 | No | |
| District | 317,625 | 223,347 | 70 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 333 | 8 | 341 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 36 | 71 | 3 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,082 | 32 | 1,114 | 438 | 50 | 60 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee