Bundibugyo District
by November 20, 2024
The access rates in Bundibugyo vary from 15 % in Mabere Sub-County to 95 % in Kasitu Sub-County. Bundibugyo has 1,573 domestic water points which serve a total of 222,780 people – 171,338 in rural areas. 44 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Bundibugyo has 20 piped schemes.
Access
71%
Rural Functionality
97%
Equity
156
Management
90%
Gender
92%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
MBY
Mbatya
Unknown
MbatyaPopulation 0
NGT
Ngite
Unknown
NgitePopulation 0
KGT
Kaghema TC
Unknown
Kaghema TCPopulation 0
MBR
Mabere
258
MaberePopulation 258
SND
Sindila
63
SindilaPopulation 63
BDG
Bundingoma
Unknown
BundingomaPopulation 0
NTT
Ntandi TC
Unknown
Ntandi TCPopulation 0
BRD
Burondo
Unknown
BurondoPopulation 0
TKW
Tokwe
Unknown
TokwePopulation 0
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
Unknown
Butamamitundu TCPopulation 0
BGT
Buganikire TC
Unknown
Buganikire TCPopulation 0
KGH
Kagughu
Unknown
KagughuPopulation 0
MRM
Mirambi
720
MirambiPopulation 720
KRM
Kirumya
688
KirumyaPopulation 688
NDG
Ndugutu
199
NdugutuPopulation 199
HRG
Harugale
189
HarugalePopulation 189
BBK
Bubukwanga
140
BubukwangaPopulation 140
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
2,560
Bundibugyo TCPopulation 2,560
BSR
Busaru
583
BusaruPopulation 583
BKN
Bukonzo
536
BukonzoPopulation 536
NTC
Nyahuka TC
1,351
Nyahuka TCPopulation 1,351
BST
Busunga TC
Unknown
Busunga TCPopulation 0
KST
Kasitu
19
KasituPopulation 19
BBN
Bubandi
652
BubandiPopulation 652
NGM
Ngamba
406
NgambaPopulation 406
NTT
Ntotoro
704
NtotoroPopulation 704
KSB
Kisuba
446
KisubaPopulation 446
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
71 %
Rural Access
71 %
Urban Access
71 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
78 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 11,586
BBN
Bubandi
46 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,900
BDG
Bundingoma
80 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,762
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,649
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,358
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,794
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,424
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 7,024
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
84 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,764
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,565
KGH
Kagughu
58 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
60 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
46 %
KisubaPopulation Served 10,200
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,339
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,704
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 8,118
NGM
Ngamba
85 %
NgambaPopulation Served 11,586
NGT
Ngite
40 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,453
NTC
Nyahuka TC
57 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
76 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 10,406
NTT
Ntandi TC
67 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
47 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
83 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
71 %
Rural Access
71 %
Urban Access
71 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
78 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 11,586
BBN
Bubandi
46 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,900
BDG
Bundingoma
80 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,762
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,649
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,358
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,794
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,424
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 7,024
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
84 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,764
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,565
KGH
Kagughu
58 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
60 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
46 %
KisubaPopulation Served 10,200
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,339
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,704
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 8,118
NGM
Ngamba
85 %
NgambaPopulation Served 11,586
NGT
Ngite
40 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,453
NTC
Nyahuka TC
57 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
76 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 10,406
NTT
Ntandi TC
67 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
47 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
83 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
97 %
Urban Functionality
97 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
100 %
BubukwangaFunctional Sources 80
BBN
Bubandi
100 %
BubandiFunctional Sources 42
BDG
Bundingoma
89 %
BundingomaFunctional Sources 25
BGT
Buganikire TC
100 %
Buganikire TCFunctional Sources 49
BKN
Bukonzo
100 %
BukonzoFunctional Sources 108
BRD
Burondo
100 %
BurondoFunctional Sources 54
BSR
Busaru
92 %
BusaruFunctional Sources 108
BST
Busunga TC
99 %
Busunga TCFunctional Sources 76
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
98 %
Bundibugyo TCFunctional Sources 118
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
100 %
Butamamitundu TCFunctional Sources 61
HRG
Harugale
98 %
HarugaleFunctional Sources 82
KGH
Kagughu
87 %
KagughuFunctional Sources 40
KGT
Kaghema TC
100 %
Kaghema TCFunctional Sources 8
KRM
Kirumya
100 %
KirumyaFunctional Sources 59
KSB
Kisuba
98 %
KisubaFunctional Sources 61
KST
Kasitu
94 %
KasituFunctional Sources 34
MBR
Mabere
100 %
MabereFunctional Sources 5
MBY
Mbatya
100 %
MbatyaFunctional Sources 4
MRM
Mirambi
100 %
MirambiFunctional Sources 91
NDG
Ndugutu
98 %
NdugutuFunctional Sources 48
NGM
Ngamba
100 %
NgambaFunctional Sources 77
NGT
Ngite
100 %
NgiteFunctional Sources 16
NTC
Nyahuka TC
91 %
Nyahuka TCFunctional Sources 72
NTT
Ntotoro
97 %
NtotoroFunctional Sources 61
NTT
Ntandi TC
97 %
Ntandi TCFunctional Sources 32
SND
Sindila
100 %
SindilaFunctional Sources 29
TKW
Tokwe
92 %
TokweFunctional Sources 83
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUGHENDERA | ||||||||
| 1 Harugale | Rural | 16,485 | 13,565 | 82% | 98% | - | - | 26 | 2 | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | 17 | - | 3 | No |
| 2 Mbatya | Rural | 5,342 | 800 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Ntandi TC | Urban | 7,152 | 4,812 | 67% | - | 97% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | - | 28 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mabere | Rural | 4,808 | 712 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Ngite | Rural | 6,090 | 2,453 | 40% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Kasitu | Rural | 3,515 | 3,339 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 17 | - | 17 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 30 | - | 5 | No |
| 7 Burondo | Rural | 7,152 | 6,794 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | - | 39 | 44 | - | 4 | No |
| 8 Ngamba | Rural | 13,697 | 11,586 | 85% | 100% | - | - | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | 52 | - | 7 | No |
| 9 Ntotoro | Rural | 13,697 | 10,406 | 76% | 97% | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 2 | 50 | 12 | - | 2 | No |
| 10 Sindila | Rural | 9,940 | 4,709 | 47% | 100% | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | - | 14 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Kagughu | Rural | 14,425 | 8,362 | 58% | 87% | - | - | 28 | 4 | 32 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | 47 | - | 10 | No |
| 12 Ndugutu | Rural | 11,879 | 8,118 | 68% | 98% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1 | 18 | 32 | - | 7 | No |
| 13 Bukonzo | Rural | 14,061 | 13,358 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 63 | - | 63 | 59 | - | 8 | No |
| 14 Butamamitundu TC | Urban | 2,909 | 2,764 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 49 | - | 49 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 131,152 | 91,778 | 70 | 97 | 99 | 0 | 172 | 6 | 178 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 23 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 349 | 5 | 354 | 234 | 0 | 38 | No | BWAMBA |
| 1 Busaru | Rural | 19,394 | 18,424 | 95% | 92% | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 95 | 8 | 103 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Nyahuka TC | Urban | 21,819 | 12,509 | 57% | - | 91% | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 54 | 6 | 60 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Tokwe | Rural | 15,394 | 12,789 | 83% | 92% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | 7 | 79 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mirambi | Rural | 14,425 | 13,704 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 64 | - | 64 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Bubukwanga | Rural | 14,788 | 11,586 | 78% | 100% | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | - | 67 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Bubandi | Rural | 14,909 | 6,900 | 46% | 100% | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 32 | - | 32 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kisuba | Rural | 22,061 | 10,200 | 46% | 98% | - | - | 15 | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kirumya | Rural | 14,667 | 8,771 | 60% | 100% | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | - | 43 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Bundingoma | Rural | 5,940 | 4,762 | 80% | 89% | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 3 | 15 | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Buganikire TC | Urban | 2,788 | 2,649 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Bundibugyo TC | Urban | 24,728 | 20,672 | 84% | - | 98% | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 104 | 2 | 106 | 145 | 50 | 14 | No |
| 12 Busunga TC | Urban | 7,394 | 7,024 | 95% | - | 99% | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 1 | 44 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kaghema TC | Urban | 5,342 | 1,012 | 19% | - | 100% | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 183,649 | 131,002 | 71 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 161 | 2 | 163 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 25 | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 733 | 27 | 760 | 204 | 50 | 22 | No | |
| District | 314,801 | 222,780 | 71 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 333 | 8 | 341 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 36 | 71 | 3 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,082 | 32 | 1,114 | 438 | 50 | 60 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee