Bundibugyo District
by April 28, 2024
The access rates in Bundibugyo vary from 15 % in Mabere Sub-County to 95 % in Kasitu Sub-County. Bundibugyo has 1,545 domestic water points which serve a total of 217,669 people – 166,399 in rural areas. 44 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Bundibugyo has 20 piped schemes.
Access
70%
Rural Functionality
97%
Equity
157
Management
90%
Gender
92%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
MBY
Mbatya
Unknown
MbatyaPopulation 0
NGT
Ngite
Unknown
NgitePopulation 0
KGT
Kaghema TC
Unknown
Kaghema TCPopulation 0
MBR
Mabere
254
MaberePopulation 254
SND
Sindila
63
SindilaPopulation 63
BDG
Bundingoma
Unknown
BundingomaPopulation 0
NTT
Ntandi TC
Unknown
Ntandi TCPopulation 0
BRD
Burondo
Unknown
BurondoPopulation 0
TKW
Tokwe
Unknown
TokwePopulation 0
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
Unknown
Butamamitundu TCPopulation 0
BGT
Buganikire TC
Unknown
Buganikire TCPopulation 0
KGH
Kagughu
Unknown
KagughuPopulation 0
MRM
Mirambi
710
MirambiPopulation 710
KRM
Kirumya
678
KirumyaPopulation 678
NDG
Ndugutu
196
NdugutuPopulation 196
HRG
Harugale
187
HarugalePopulation 187
BBK
Bubukwanga
138
BubukwangaPopulation 138
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
2,524
Bundibugyo TCPopulation 2,524
BSR
Busaru
575
BusaruPopulation 575
BKN
Bukonzo
529
BukonzoPopulation 529
NTC
Nyahuka TC
1,332
Nyahuka TCPopulation 1,332
BST
Busunga TC
Unknown
Busunga TCPopulation 0
KST
Kasitu
18
KasituPopulation 18
BBN
Bubandi
643
BubandiPopulation 643
NGM
Ngamba
400
NgambaPopulation 400
NTT
Ntotoro
694
NtotoroPopulation 694
KSB
Kisuba
440
KisubaPopulation 440
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
70 %
Rural Access
70 %
Urban Access
72 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
74 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 10,786
BBN
Bubandi
44 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,450
BDG
Bundingoma
71 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,162
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,612
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,174
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,700
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,100
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 6,927
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
85 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,726
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,365
KGH
Kagughu
59 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
61 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
45 %
KisubaPopulation Served 9,800
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,294
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,514
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 7,968
NGM
Ngamba
80 %
NgambaPopulation Served 10,836
NGT
Ngite
38 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,253
NTC
Nyahuka TC
58 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
73 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 9,856
NTT
Ntandi TC
68 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
48 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
84 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
70 %
Rural Access
70 %
Urban Access
72 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
74 %
BubukwangaPopulation Served 10,786
BBN
Bubandi
44 %
BubandiPopulation Served 6,450
BDG
Bundingoma
71 %
BundingomaPopulation Served 4,162
BGT
Buganikire TC
95 %
Buganikire TCPopulation Served 2,612
BKN
Bukonzo
95 %
BukonzoPopulation Served 13,174
BRD
Burondo
95 %
BurondoPopulation Served 6,700
BSR
Busaru
95 %
BusaruPopulation Served 18,100
BST
Busunga TC
95 %
Busunga TCPopulation Served 6,927
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
85 %
Bundibugyo TCPopulation Served 20,672
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
95 %
Butamamitundu TCPopulation Served 2,726
HRG
Harugale
82 %
HarugalePopulation Served 13,365
KGH
Kagughu
59 %
KagughuPopulation Served 8,362
KGT
Kaghema TC
19 %
Kaghema TCPopulation Served 1,012
KRM
Kirumya
61 %
KirumyaPopulation Served 8,771
KSB
Kisuba
45 %
KisubaPopulation Served 9,800
KST
Kasitu
95 %
KasituPopulation Served 3,294
MBR
Mabere
15 %
MaberePopulation Served 712
MBY
Mbatya
15 %
MbatyaPopulation Served 800
MRM
Mirambi
95 %
MirambiPopulation Served 13,514
NDG
Ndugutu
68 %
NdugutuPopulation Served 7,968
NGM
Ngamba
80 %
NgambaPopulation Served 10,836
NGT
Ngite
38 %
NgitePopulation Served 2,253
NTC
Nyahuka TC
58 %
Nyahuka TCPopulation Served 12,509
NTT
Ntotoro
73 %
NtotoroPopulation Served 9,856
NTT
Ntandi TC
68 %
Ntandi TCPopulation Served 4,812
SND
Sindila
48 %
SindilaPopulation Served 4,709
TKW
Tokwe
84 %
TokwePopulation Served 12,789
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
97 %
Urban Functionality
97 %
BBK
Bubukwanga
100 %
BubukwangaFunctional Sources 76
BBN
Bubandi
100 %
BubandiFunctional Sources 39
BDG
Bundingoma
88 %
BundingomaFunctional Sources 22
BGT
Buganikire TC
100 %
Buganikire TCFunctional Sources 49
BKN
Bukonzo
100 %
BukonzoFunctional Sources 108
BRD
Burondo
100 %
BurondoFunctional Sources 54
BSR
Busaru
92 %
BusaruFunctional Sources 105
BST
Busunga TC
99 %
Busunga TCFunctional Sources 76
BTC
Bundibugyo TC
98 %
Bundibugyo TCFunctional Sources 118
BTC
Butamamitundu TC
100 %
Butamamitundu TCFunctional Sources 59
HRG
Harugale
98 %
HarugaleFunctional Sources 81
KGH
Kagughu
87 %
KagughuFunctional Sources 40
KGT
Kaghema TC
100 %
Kaghema TCFunctional Sources 8
KRM
Kirumya
100 %
KirumyaFunctional Sources 59
KSB
Kisuba
98 %
KisubaFunctional Sources 59
KST
Kasitu
94 %
KasituFunctional Sources 34
MBR
Mabere
100 %
MabereFunctional Sources 5
MBY
Mbatya
100 %
MbatyaFunctional Sources 4
MRM
Mirambi
100 %
MirambiFunctional Sources 91
NDG
Ndugutu
98 %
NdugutuFunctional Sources 47
NGM
Ngamba
100 %
NgambaFunctional Sources 72
NGT
Ngite
100 %
NgiteFunctional Sources 15
NTC
Nyahuka TC
91 %
Nyahuka TCFunctional Sources 72
NTT
Ntotoro
97 %
NtotoroFunctional Sources 58
NTT
Ntandi TC
97 %
Ntandi TCFunctional Sources 32
SND
Sindila
100 %
SindilaFunctional Sources 29
TKW
Tokwe
92 %
TokweFunctional Sources 83
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUGHENDERA | ||||||||
| 1 Ntotoro | Rural | 13,508 | 9,856 | 73% | 97% | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 2 | 49 | 12 | - | 2 | No |
| 2 Harugale | Rural | 16,257 | 13,365 | 82% | 98% | - | - | 25 | 2 | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | - | 53 | 17 | - | 3 | No |
| 3 Mbatya | Rural | 5,259 | 800 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Sindila | Rural | 9,802 | 4,709 | 48% | 100% | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | - | 14 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Kagughu | Rural | 14,225 | 8,362 | 59% | 87% | - | - | 28 | 4 | 32 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | 47 | - | 10 | No |
| 6 Ntandi TC | Urban | 7,053 | 4,812 | 68% | - | 97% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | - | 28 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Mabere | Rural | 4,733 | 712 | 15% | 100% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Ngite | Rural | 5,995 | 2,253 | 38% | 100% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Kasitu | Rural | 3,467 | 3,294 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 17 | - | 17 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 30 | - | 5 | No |
| 10 Ndugutu | Rural | 11,715 | 7,968 | 68% | 98% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 | 1 | 17 | 32 | - | 7 | No |
| 11 Burondo | Rural | 7,053 | 6,700 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | - | 39 | 44 | - | 4 | No |
| 12 Ngamba | Rural | 13,508 | 10,836 | 80% | 100% | - | - | 18 | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | - | 48 | 52 | - | 7 | No |
| 13 Bukonzo | Rural | 13,867 | 13,174 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 12 | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 63 | - | 63 | 59 | - | 8 | No |
| 14 Butamamitundu TC | Urban | 2,869 | 2,726 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | - | 47 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 129,311 | 89,566 | 69 | 97 | 99 | 0 | 168 | 6 | 174 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 23 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 340 | 5 | 345 | 234 | 0 | 38 | No | BWAMBA |
| 1 Busaru | Rural | 19,126 | 18,100 | 95% | 92% | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 92 | 8 | 100 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Nyahuka TC | Urban | 21,517 | 12,509 | 58% | - | 91% | - | 15 | 1 | 16 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 54 | 6 | 60 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Tokwe | Rural | 15,182 | 12,789 | 84% | 92% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | 7 | 79 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mirambi | Rural | 14,225 | 13,514 | 95% | 100% | - | - | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 64 | - | 64 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Bubukwanga | Rural | 14,584 | 10,786 | 74% | 100% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | - | 67 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Bubandi | Rural | 14,703 | 6,450 | 44% | 100% | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | - | 29 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kirumya | Rural | 14,464 | 8,771 | 61% | 100% | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | - | 43 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Bundingoma | Rural | 5,857 | 4,162 | 71% | 88% | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 3 | 15 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Buganikire TC | Urban | 2,749 | 2,612 | 95% | - | 100% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Kisuba | Rural | 21,756 | 9,800 | 45% | 98% | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | 46 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Bundibugyo TC | Urban | 24,386 | 20,672 | 85% | - | 98% | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 104 | 2 | 106 | 145 | 50 | 14 | No |
| 12 Busunga TC | Urban | 7,292 | 6,927 | 95% | - | 99% | - | 13 | - | 13 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43 | 1 | 44 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kaghema TC | Urban | 5,259 | 1,012 | 19% | - | 100% | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 181,100 | 128,103 | 71 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 152 | 2 | 154 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 25 | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 727 | 27 | 754 | 204 | 50 | 22 | No | |
| District | 310,411 | 217,669 | 70 | 97 | 97 | 0 | 320 | 8 | 328 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 1 | 36 | 71 | 3 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,067 | 32 | 1,099 | 438 | 50 | 60 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Surface Water Based/GFS | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee