Dokolo District

by January 21, 2025

The access rates in Dokolo vary from 1 % in Agwata TC Sub-County to 95 % in Batta TC Sub-County. Dokolo has 907 domestic water points which serve a total of 218,067 people – 195,928 in rural areas. 229 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Dokolo has 2 piped schemes.

Access

81^%

Rural Functionality

76^%

Equity

31

Management

81^%

Gender

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ADK Adok 156

AMW Amwoma 283

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

BTC Batta TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 273

DTC Dokolo TC 329

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

BTT Batta 241

DKL Dokolo 280

KNG Kangai 274

KWR Kwera 359

ADO Adeknino 277

OKW Okwalongwen 243

OKL Okwongodul 265

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 81 %

Rural Access 92 %

Urban Access 39 %

ADK Adok 87 %

ADO Adeknino 92 %

AGT Agwata TC 1 %

AGW Agwata 93 %

AMW Amwoma 88 %

BTC Batta TC 95 %

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 67 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC 10 %

KWR Kwera 90 %

OKL Okwongodul 87 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 81 %

Rural Access 92 %

Urban Access 39 %

ADK Adok 87 %

ADO Adeknino 92 %

AGT Agwata TC 1 %

AGW Agwata 93 %

AMW Amwoma 88 %

BTC Batta TC 95 %

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 67 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC 10 %

KWR Kwera 90 %

OKL Okwongodul 87 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 76 %

Urban Functionality 66 %

ADK Adok 83 %

ADO Adeknino 81 %

AGT Agwata TC 100 %

AGW Agwata 67 %

AMW Amwoma 82 %

BTC Batta TC 100 %

BTT Batta 71 %

DKL Dokolo 65 %

DTC Dokolo TC 58 %

KNG Kangai 83 %

KTC Kangai TC 25 %

KWR Kwera 82 %

OKL Okwongodul 81 %

OKW Okwalongwen 72 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
DOKOLO
1 Dokolo	Rural	20,640	19,608	95%	65%	-	-	16	19	35	5	7	12	26	-	26	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	124	289	10	No
2 Okwalongwen	Rural	18,940	17,993	95%	72%	-	-	28	12	40	6	10	16	30	-	30	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	3	6	-	-	-	No
3 Kangai TC	Urban	14,451	1,400	10%	-	25%	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	6	-	-	-	No
4 Kwera	Rural	17,483	15,818	90%	82%	-	-	1	-	1	17	9	26	25	1	26	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Amwoma	Rural	19,062	16,830	88%	82%	-	-	8	4	12	5	7	12	35	1	36	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Adok	Rural	23,432	20,374	87%	83%	-	-	13	4	17	15	5	20	33	3	36	3	1	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
7 Okwongodul	Rural	17,847	15,506	87%	81%	-	-	3	1	4	15	5	20	26	3	29	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Batta	Rural	24,161	22,953	95%	71%	-	-	27	14	41	12	12	24	34	3	37	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
9 Kangai	Rural	22,582	21,453	95%	83%	-	-	6	1	7	13	9	22	50	1	51	7	5	12	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Dokolo TC	Urban	26,346	17,692	67%	-	58%	-	9	23	32	11	5	16	17	2	19	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	3	5	-	-	-	No
11 Batta TC	Urban	2,997	2,847	95%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	20	-	-	-	No
12 Agwata	Rural	27,925	26,107	93%	67%	-	-	-	5	5	22	18	40	39	2	41	6	4	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	4	5	-	-	-	No
13 Agwata TC	Urban	13,488	200	1%	-	100%	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Adeknino	Rural	21,004	19,286	92%	81%	-	-	1	-	1	7	6	13	46	4	50	5	3	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
Total		270,358	218,067	81	76	66	0	114	83	197	129	93	222	369	20	389	39	16	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	27	17	44	124	289	10	No
District		270,358	218,067	81	76	66	0	114	83	197	129	93	222	369	20	389	39	16	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	27	17	44	124	289	10	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0
Total	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

81%

76%

31

81%

93%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

81^%

76^%

81^%

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population