Dokolo District

by April 28, 2024

The access rates in Dokolo vary from 2 % in Agwata TC Sub-County to 95 % in Batta TC Sub-County. Dokolo has 907 domestic water points which serve a total of 216,753 people – 194,663 in rural areas. 229 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Dokolo has 2 piped schemes.

Access

81^%

Rural Functionality

76^%

Equity

31

Management

81^%

Gender

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ADK Adok 154

AMW Amwoma 278

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

BTC Batta TC Unknown

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 268

DTC Dokolo TC 324

BTT Batta 237

DKL Dokolo 276

KNG Kangai 270

KWR Kwera 354

ADO Adeknino 273

OKW Okwalongwen 240

OKL Okwongodul 261

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 81 %

Rural Access 93 %

Urban Access 39 %

ADK Adok 88 %

ADO Adeknino 93 %

AGT Agwata TC 2 %

AGW Agwata 95 %

AMW Amwoma 90 %

BTC Batta TC 95 %

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 68 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC 10 %

KWR Kwera 92 %

OKL Okwongodul 88 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 81 %

Rural Access 93 %

Urban Access 39 %

ADK Adok 88 %

ADO Adeknino 93 %

AGT Agwata TC 2 %

AGW Agwata 95 %

AMW Amwoma 90 %

BTC Batta TC 95 %

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 68 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC 10 %

KWR Kwera 92 %

OKL Okwongodul 88 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 76 %

Urban Functionality 66 %

ADK Adok 83 %

ADO Adeknino 81 %

AGT Agwata TC 100 %

AGW Agwata 67 %

AMW Amwoma 82 %

BTC Batta TC 100 %

BTT Batta 71 %

DKL Dokolo 65 %

DTC Dokolo TC 58 %

KNG Kangai 83 %

KTC Kangai TC 25 %

KWR Kwera 82 %

OKL Okwongodul 81 %

OKW Okwalongwen 72 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
DOKOLO
1 Okwongodul	Rural	17,572	15,506	88%	81%	-	-	3	1	4	15	5	20	26	3	29	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Batta	Rural	23,788	22,599	95%	71%	-	-	27	14	41	12	12	24	34	3	37	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Dokolo	Rural	20,322	19,306	95%	65%	-	-	16	19	35	5	7	12	26	-	26	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	124	289	10	No
4 Kangai	Rural	22,234	21,122	95%	83%	-	-	6	1	7	13	9	22	50	1	51	7	5	12	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Okwalongwen	Rural	18,648	17,716	95%	72%	-	-	28	12	40	6	10	16	30	-	30	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	3	6	-	-	-	No
6 Dokolo TC	Urban	25,940	17,692	68%	-	58%	-	9	23	32	11	5	16	17	2	19	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	3	5	-	-	-	No
7 Batta TC	Urban	2,945	2,798	95%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	20	-	-	-	No
8 Kangai TC	Urban	14,198	1,400	10%	-	25%	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	6	-	-	-	No
9 Agwata	Rural	27,494	26,107	95%	67%	-	-	-	5	5	22	18	40	39	2	41	6	4	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	4	5	-	-	-	No
10 Kwera	Rural	17,214	15,818	92%	82%	-	-	1	-	1	17	9	26	25	1	26	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Agwata TC	Urban	13,252	200	2%	-	100%	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Adeknino	Rural	20,680	19,286	93%	81%	-	-	1	-	1	7	6	13	46	4	50	5	3	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
13 Amwoma	Rural	18,768	16,830	90%	82%	-	-	8	4	12	5	7	12	35	1	36	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Adok	Rural	23,071	20,374	88%	83%	-	-	13	4	17	15	5	20	33	3	36	3	1	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
Total		266,126	216,753	81	76	66	0	114	83	197	129	93	222	369	20	389	39	16	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	27	17	44	124	289	10	No
District		266,126	216,753	81	76	66	0	114	83	197	129	93	222	369	20	389	39	16	55	0	0	0	0	0	0	27	17	44	124	289	10	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0
Total	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

81%

76%

31

81%

93%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

81^%

76^%

81^%

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population