Dokolo District
by July 26, 2024
The access rates in Dokolo vary from 1 % in Agwata TC Sub-County to 95 % in Batta TC Sub-County. Dokolo has 907 domestic water points which serve a total of 217,288 people – 195,178 in rural areas. 229 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Dokolo has 2 piped schemes.
Access
81%
Rural Functionality
76%
Equity
31
Management
81%
Gender
93%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 155
Population 280
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 270
Population 326
Population 239
Population 277
Population 271
Population 356
Population 274
Population 241
Population 262
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 20,374
Population Served 19,286
Population Served 200
Population Served 26,107
Population Served 16,830
Population Served 2,818
Population Served 22,743
Population Served 19,428
Population Served 17,692
Population Served 21,257
Population Served 1,400
Population Served 15,818
Population Served 15,506
Population Served 17,829
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 20,374
Population Served 19,286
Population Served 200
Population Served 26,107
Population Served 16,830
Population Served 2,818
Population Served 22,743
Population Served 19,428
Population Served 17,692
Population Served 21,257
Population Served 1,400
Population Served 15,818
Population Served 15,506
Population Served 17,829
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 65
Functional Sources 59
Functional Sources 1
Functional Sources 68
Functional Sources 53
Functional Sources 28
Functional Sources 74
Functional Sources 49
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 76
Functional Sources 2
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 44
Functional Sources 67
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | DOKOLO | ||||||||
| 1 Okwongodul | Rural | 17,684 | 15,506 | 88% | 81% | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 26 | 3 | 29 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Batta | Rural | 23,940 | 22,743 | 95% | 71% | - | - | 27 | 14 | 41 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 34 | 3 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Dokolo | Rural | 20,451 | 19,428 | 95% | 65% | - | - | 16 | 19 | 35 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 26 | - | 26 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 124 | 289 | 10 | No |
| 4 Kangai | Rural | 22,376 | 21,257 | 95% | 83% | - | - | 6 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 50 | 1 | 51 | 7 | 5 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Okwalongwen | Rural | 18,767 | 17,829 | 95% | 72% | - | - | 28 | 12 | 40 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 30 | - | 30 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Dokolo TC | Urban | 26,106 | 17,692 | 68% | - | 58% | - | 9 | 23 | 32 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 17 | 2 | 19 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Batta TC | Urban | 2,966 | 2,818 | 95% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | - | 20 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kangai TC | Urban | 14,301 | 1,400 | 10% | - | 25% | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Agwata | Rural | 27,670 | 26,107 | 94% | 67% | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 39 | 2 | 41 | 6 | 4 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Kwera | Rural | 17,324 | 15,818 | 91% | 82% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 25 | 1 | 26 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Agwata TC | Urban | 13,348 | 200 | 1% | - | 100% | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Adeknino | Rural | 20,812 | 19,286 | 93% | 81% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 46 | 4 | 50 | 5 | 3 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Amwoma | Rural | 18,887 | 16,830 | 89% | 82% | - | - | 8 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 35 | 1 | 36 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Adok | Rural | 23,218 | 20,374 | 88% | 83% | - | - | 13 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 267,850 | 217,288 | 81 | 76 | 66 | 0 | 114 | 83 | 197 | 129 | 93 | 222 | 369 | 20 | 389 | 39 | 16 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 44 | 124 | 289 | 10 | No | |
| District | 267,850 | 217,288 | 81 | 76 | 66 | 0 | 114 | 83 | 197 | 129 | 93 | 222 | 369 | 20 | 389 | 39 | 16 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 44 | 124 | 289 | 10 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee