Dokolo District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Dokolo vary from 2 % in Agwata TC Sub-County to 95 % in Batta TC Sub-County. Dokolo has 894 domestic water points which serve a total of 214,326 people – 191,680 in rural areas. 117 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Dokolo has 2 piped schemes.

Access

82^%

Rural Functionality

86^%

Equity

29

Management

81^%

Gender

96^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ADK Adok 152

AMW Amwoma 274

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

BTC Batta TC Unknown

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 265

DTC Dokolo TC 319

BTT Batta 234

DKL Dokolo 272

KNG Kangai 266

KWR Kwera 349

ADO Adeknino 269

OKW Okwalongwen 236

OKL Okwongodul 257

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 82 %

Rural Access 93 %

Urban Access 41 %

ADK Adok 84 %

ADO Adeknino 92 %

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 95 %

AMW Amwoma 91 %

BTC Batta TC Unknown

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 70 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

KWR Kwera 95 %

OKL Okwongodul 89 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 82 %

Rural Access 93 %

Urban Access 41 %

ADK Adok 84 %

ADO Adeknino 92 %

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 95 %

AMW Amwoma 91 %

BTC Batta TC Unknown

BTT Batta 95 %

DKL Dokolo 95 %

DTC Dokolo TC 70 %

KNG Kangai 95 %

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

KWR Kwera 95 %

OKL Okwongodul 89 %

OKW Okwalongwen 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 86 %

Urban Functionality 92 %

ADK Adok 66 %

ADO Adeknino 94 %

AGT Agwata TC Unknown

AGW Agwata 88 %

AMW Amwoma 66 %

BTC Batta TC Unknown

BTT Batta 69 %

DKL Dokolo 88 %

DTC Dokolo TC 90 %

KNG Kangai 91 %

KTC Kangai TC Unknown

KWR Kwera 95 %

OKL Okwongodul 83 %

OKW Okwalongwen 82 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
DOKOLO
1 Okwongodul	Rural	17,326	15,506	89%	87%	-	-	4	-	4	15	2	17	20	6	26	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Batta	Rural	23,455	22,282	95%	80%	-	-	23	13	36	14	8	22	25	8	33	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Dokolo	Rural	20,037	19,035	95%	89%	-	-	30	3	33	8	2	10	19	3	22	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	124	289	10	No
4 Kangai	Rural	21,923	20,827	95%	89%	-	-	4	1	5	17	3	20	47	3	50	10	1	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Okwalongwen	Rural	18,387	17,468	95%	88%	-	-	27	6	33	8	5	13	23	2	25	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
6 Dokolo TC	Urban	25,577	17,992	70%	-	96%	-	27	2	29	12	2	14	16	2	18	5	1	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	4	-	-	-	No
7 Agwata	Rural	27,109	25,754	95%	80%	-	-	3	1	4	24	4	28	35	1	36	7	2	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	2	4	-	-	-	No
8 Kwera	Rural	16,973	16,118	95%	95%	-	-	1	-	1	18	2	20	19	-	19	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
9 Adeknino	Rural	20,391	18,686	92%	90%	-	-	-	-	-	7	1	8	36	-	36	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Amwoma	Rural	18,505	16,830	91%	83%	-	-	5	4	9	5	7	12	27	9	36	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Adok	Rural	22,748	19,174	84%	88%	-	-	7	7	14	9	7	16	20	5	25	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
Total		262,342	214,326	82	86	92	0	171	24	195	171	49	220	370	11	381	34	20	54	0	0	0	0	0	0	31	13	44	124	289	10	No
District		262,342	214,326	82	86	92	0	171	24	195	171	49	220	370	11	381	34	20	54	0	0	0	0	0	0	31	13	44	124	289	10	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0
Total	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

82%

86%

29

81%

96%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

82^%

86^%

81^%

96^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population