Yumbe District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Yumbe vary from 36 % in Kuru Sub-County to 61 % in Drajini Sub-County. Yumbe has 1,225 domestic water points which serve a total of 361,650 people – 334,068 in rural areas. 38 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Yumbe has 3 piped schemes.
Access
48%
Rural Functionality
97%
Equity
87
Management
99%
Gender
81%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 211
Population 383
Population 223
Population 400
Population 714
Population 398
Population 485
Population 1,182
Population 2,539
Population 668
Population 174
Population 190
Population 151
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 30,024
Population Served 15,300
Population Served 29,518
Population Served 30,518
Population Served 34,580
Population Served 23,712
Population Served 22,712
Population Served 28,800
Population Served 26,418
Population Served 23,156
Population Served 38,106
Population Served 31,224
Population Served 27,582
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 30,024
Population Served 15,300
Population Served 29,518
Population Served 30,518
Population Served 34,580
Population Served 23,712
Population Served 22,712
Population Served 28,800
Population Served 26,418
Population Served 23,156
Population Served 38,106
Population Served 31,224
Population Served 27,582
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 83
Functional Sources 40
Functional Sources 58
Functional Sources 92
Functional Sources 78
Functional Sources 69
Functional Sources 60
Functional Sources 67
Functional Sources 67
Functional Sources 50
Functional Sources 88
Functional Sources 90
Functional Sources 59
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | ARINGA | ||||||||
| 1 Kei | Rural | 71,180 | 34,580 | 49% | 95% | - | - | 3 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 63 | - | 63 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Kululu | Rural | 57,507 | 23,712 | 41% | 96% | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 2 | 9 | 57 | 1 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Yumbe TC | Urban | 54,156 | 27,582 | 51% | - | 99% | - | - | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 43 | - | 43 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | - | 13 | 287 | 15 | 33 | No |
| 4 Ariwa | Rural | 37,400 | 15,300 | 41% | 96% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 38 | 3 | 41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Kerwa | Rural | 50,268 | 28,800 | 57% | 99% | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | 62 | - | 62 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Midigo | Rural | 56,971 | 23,156 | 41% | 100% | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 1 | 37 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Romogi | Rural | 71,046 | 31,224 | 44% | 96% | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | 1 | 14 | 74 | 1 | 75 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kuru | Rural | 63,539 | 22,712 | 36% | 100% | - | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 13 | 47 | 4 | 51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 145 | 2 | 6 | No |
| 9 Odravu | Rural | 65,818 | 38,106 | 58% | 98% | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | 77 | 3 | 80 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | - | - | No |
| 10 Drajini | Rural | 48,660 | 29,518 | 61% | 97% | - | - | 6 | 2 | 8 | 5 | - | 5 | 47 | 1 | 48 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Apo | Rural | 62,601 | 30,024 | 48% | 92% | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 66 | 3 | 69 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Lodonga | Rural | 50,670 | 26,418 | 52% | 96% | - | - | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 49 | 1 | 50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kochi | Rural | 64,343 | 30,518 | 47% | 98% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 10 | - | 10 | 78 | 1 | 79 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 754,159 | 361,650 | 48 | 97 | 99 | 0 | 36 | 3 | 39 | 113 | 10 | 123 | 1,004 | 3 | 1,007 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 450 | 17 | 39 | No | |
| District | 754,159 | 361,650 | 48 | 97 | 99 | 0 | 36 | 3 | 39 | 113 | 10 | 123 | 1,004 | 3 | 1,007 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 450 | 17 | 39 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee