Yumbe District
by December 4, 2024
The access rates in Yumbe vary from 31 % in Bijo Sub-County to 82 % in Kei Sub-County. Yumbe has 1,275 domestic water points which serve a total of 374,600 people – 310,582 in rural areas. 203 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Yumbe has 3 piped schemes.
Access
47%
Rural Functionality
85%
Equity
164
Management
99%
Gender
98%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
KRW
Kerwa
185
KerwaPopulation 185
Kuru Town Council
Unknown
Kuru Town CouncilPopulation 0
Aria
Unknown
AriaPopulation 0
KLL
Kululu
195
KululuPopulation 195
Bijo
Unknown
BijoPopulation 0
KCH
Kochi
144
KochiPopulation 144
ODR
Odravu
149
OdravuPopulation 149
APO
Apo
528
ApoPopulation 528
RMG
Romogi
228
RomogiPopulation 228
Lodonga Town Council
Unknown
Lodonga Town CouncilPopulation 0
Wandi
Unknown
WandiPopulation 0
Kulikulinga Town Council
Unknown
Kulikulinga Town CouncilPopulation 0
Odravu west
Unknown
Odravu westPopulation 0
Arafa
Unknown
ArafaPopulation 0
Midigo Town Council
Unknown
Midigo Town CouncilPopulation 0
KEI
Kei
113
KeiPopulation 113
MDG
Midigo
57
MidigoPopulation 57
ARW
Ariwa
163
AriwaPopulation 163
DRJ
Drajini
279
DrajiniPopulation 279
KRU
Kuru
805
KuruPopulation 805
LDN
Lodonga
471
LodongaPopulation 471
YTC
Yumbe TC
1,927
Yumbe TCPopulation 1,927
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
47 %
Rural Access
50 %
Urban Access
36 %
Wandi
45 %
WandiPopulation Served 10,500
Kuru Town Council
NWSC
Kuru Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Aria
40 %
AriaPopulation Served 16,156
Midigo Town Council
NWSC
Midigo Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Bijo
31 %
BijoPopulation Served 15,600
Arafa
41 %
ArafaPopulation Served 15,662
Odravu west
44 %
Odravu westPopulation Served 18,306
Lodonga Town Council
NWSC
Lodonga Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Kulikulinga Town Council
NWSC
Kulikulinga Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
APO
Apo
36 %
ApoPopulation Served 16,568
ARW
Ariwa
47 %
AriwaPopulation Served 16,350
DRJ
Drajini
52 %
DrajiniPopulation Served 14,606
KCH
Kochi
77 %
KochiPopulation Served 32,168
KEI
Kei
82 %
KeiPopulation Served 34,880
KLL
Kululu
33 %
KululuPopulation Served 9,812
KRU
Kuru
33 %
KuruPopulation Served 14,300
KRW
Kerwa
42 %
KerwaPopulation Served 18,600
LDN
Lodonga
40 %
LodongaPopulation Served 14,100
MDG
Midigo
63 %
MidigoPopulation Served 13,600
ODR
Odravu
72 %
OdravuPopulation Served 17,700
RMG
Romogi
78 %
RomogiPopulation Served 31,674
YTC
Yumbe TC
69 %
Yumbe TCPopulation Served 28,182
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
47 %
Rural Access
50 %
Urban Access
36 %
Wandi
45 %
WandiPopulation Served 10,500
Kuru Town Council
NWSC
Kuru Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Aria
40 %
AriaPopulation Served 16,156
Midigo Town Council
NWSC
Midigo Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Bijo
31 %
BijoPopulation Served 15,600
Arafa
41 %
ArafaPopulation Served 15,662
Odravu west
44 %
Odravu westPopulation Served 18,306
Lodonga Town Council
NWSC
Lodonga Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
Kulikulinga Town Council
NWSC
Kulikulinga Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
APO
Apo
36 %
ApoPopulation Served 16,568
ARW
Ariwa
47 %
AriwaPopulation Served 16,350
DRJ
Drajini
52 %
DrajiniPopulation Served 14,606
KCH
Kochi
77 %
KochiPopulation Served 32,168
KEI
Kei
82 %
KeiPopulation Served 34,880
KLL
Kululu
33 %
KululuPopulation Served 9,812
KRU
Kuru
33 %
KuruPopulation Served 14,300
KRW
Kerwa
42 %
KerwaPopulation Served 18,600
LDN
Lodonga
40 %
LodongaPopulation Served 14,100
MDG
Midigo
63 %
MidigoPopulation Served 13,600
ODR
Odravu
72 %
OdravuPopulation Served 17,700
RMG
Romogi
78 %
RomogiPopulation Served 31,674
YTC
Yumbe TC
69 %
Yumbe TCPopulation Served 28,182
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
85 %
Urban Functionality
81 %
Wandi
94 %
WandiFunctional Sources 33
Kuru Town Council
NWSC
Kuru Town CouncilFunctional Sources 29
Aria
78 %
AriaFunctional Sources 45
Midigo Town Council
NWSC
Midigo Town CouncilFunctional Sources 24
Bijo
85 %
BijoFunctional Sources 46
Arafa
78 %
ArafaFunctional Sources 45
Odravu west
82 %
Odravu westFunctional Sources 51
Lodonga Town Council
NWSC
Lodonga Town CouncilFunctional Sources 40
Kulikulinga Town Council
NWSC
Kulikulinga Town CouncilFunctional Sources 7
APO
Apo
75 %
ApoFunctional Sources 45
ARW
Ariwa
85 %
AriwaFunctional Sources 47
DRJ
Drajini
90 %
DrajiniFunctional Sources 45
KCH
Kochi
88 %
KochiFunctional Sources 98
KEI
Kei
79 %
KeiFunctional Sources 99
KLL
Kululu
69 %
KululuFunctional Sources 24
KRU
Kuru
92 %
KuruFunctional Sources 44
KRW
Kerwa
95 %
KerwaFunctional Sources 59
LDN
Lodonga
85 %
LodongaFunctional Sources 41
MDG
Midigo
89 %
MidigoFunctional Sources 41
ODR
Odravu
90 %
OdravuFunctional Sources 53
RMG
Romogi
86 %
RomogiFunctional Sources 95
YTC
Yumbe TC
88 %
Yumbe TCFunctional Sources 61
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | ARINGA | ||||||||
| 1 Wandi | Rural | 23,255 | 10,500 | 45% | 94% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 31 | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Yumbe TC | Urban | 41,102 | 28,182 | 69% | - | 88% | - | - | - | - | 4 | 2 | 6 | 46 | 3 | 49 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 2 | 13 | 287 | 15 | 33 | No |
| 3 Kuru Town Council | Urban | 41,778 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 88% | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 25 | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 145 | 2 | 6 | Yes |
| 4 Ariwa | Rural | 35,018 | 16,350 | 47% | 85% | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 2 | 6 | 42 | 6 | 48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Kerwa | Rural | 43,941 | 18,600 | 42% | 95% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 58 | 2 | 60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Odravu west | Rural | 41,372 | 18,306 | 44% | 82% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 6 | 47 | 8 | 55 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | - | - | No |
| 7 Odravu | Rural | 24,472 | 17,700 | 72% | 90% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 51 | 2 | 53 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Midigo Town Council | Urban | 40,831 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 62% | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 6 | 27 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 9 Drajini | Rural | 27,987 | 14,606 | 52% | 90% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 45 | 2 | 47 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Apo | Rural | 46,239 | 16,568 | 36% | 75% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 39 | 2 | 41 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Kulikulinga Town Council | Urban | 25,283 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 12 Kei | Rural | 42,318 | 34,880 | 82% | 79% | - | - | - | 10 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 96 | 3 | 99 | - | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kululu | Rural | 29,339 | 9,812 | 33% | 69% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 4 | 4 | 22 | 6 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Lodonga Town Council | Urban | 29,204 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 78% | - | - | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 3 | 34 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 15 Midigo | Rural | 21,497 | 13,600 | 63% | 89% | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 1 | 41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 16 Bijo | Rural | 50,431 | 15,600 | 31% | 85% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 5 | 45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| 17 Romogi | Rural | 40,696 | 31,674 | 78% | 86% | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 4 | 13 | 85 | 7 | 92 | - | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 18 Kuru | Rural | 43,278 | 14,300 | 33% | 92% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 37 | 1 | 38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 19 Arafa | Rural | 38,262 | 15,662 | 41% | 78% | - | - | - | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 40 | 2 | 42 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 20 Aria | Rural | 40,696 | 16,156 | 40% | 78% | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 39 | 5 | 44 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 21 Lodonga | Rural | 35,694 | 14,100 | 40% | 85% | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 39 | 2 | 41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 22 Kochi | Rural | 41,507 | 32,168 | 77% | 88% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 89 | 7 | 96 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 804,200 | 374,600 | 47 | 85 | 81 | 0 | 3 | 37 | 40 | 56 | 67 | 123 | 970 | 73 | 1,043 | 4 | 23 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 3 | 42 | 450 | 17 | 39 | No | |
| District | 804,200 | 374,600 | 47 | 85 | 81 | 0 | 3 | 37 | 40 | 56 | 67 | 123 | 970 | 73 | 1,043 | 4 | 23 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 3 | 42 | 450 | 17 | 39 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee