Oyam District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Oyam vary from 41 % in Oyam TC Sub-County to 95 % in Abok Sub-County. Oyam has 1,182 domestic water points which serve a total of 316,463 people – 310,207 in rural areas. 213 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Oyam has 2 piped schemes.

Access

64^%

Rural Functionality

82^%

Equity

83

Management

97^%

Gender

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ABK Abok 166

ALK Aleka 304

KMD Kamdini 383

ACB Acaba 214

LRO Loro 241

NGI Ngai 208

MYN Myene 193

MNK Minakulu 212

OTW Otwal 245

ICM Iceme 236

OTC Oyam TC 323

ABR Aber 163

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 64 %

Rural Access 65 %

Urban Access 41 %

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 69 %

ICM Iceme 73 %

KMD Kamdini 42 %

LRO Loro 67 %

MNK Minakulu 59 %

MYN Myene 50 %

NGI Ngai 78 %

OTC Oyam TC 41 %

OTW Otwal 69 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 64 %

Rural Access 65 %

Urban Access 41 %

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 69 %

ICM Iceme 73 %

KMD Kamdini 42 %

LRO Loro 67 %

MNK Minakulu 59 %

MYN Myene 50 %

NGI Ngai 78 %

OTC Oyam TC 41 %

OTW Otwal 69 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 82 %

Urban Functionality 78 %

ABK Abok 92 %

ABR Aber 92 %

ACB Acaba 83 %

ALK Aleka 97 %

ICM Iceme 92 %

KMD Kamdini 95 %

LRO Loro 92 %

MNK Minakulu 76 %

MYN Myene 93 %

NGI Ngai 81 %

OTC Oyam TC 92 %

OTW Otwal 100 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
OYAM
1 Ngai	Rural	37,281	29,206	78%	88%	-	-	32	2	34	19	6	25	33	9	42	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	2	-	-	-	No
2 Oyam TC	Urban	15,127	6,256	41%	-	78%	-	2	-	2	5	-	5	14	-	14	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
3 Myene	Rural	35,495	17,612	50%	81%	-	-	10	-	10	21	1	22	24	2	26	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Acaba	Rural	36,209	24,330	67%	91%	-	-	5	-	5	23	6	29	37	3	40	-	4	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Loro	Rural	71,108	47,410	67%	73%	-	-	9	-	9	66	10	76	72	4	76	10	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
6 Kamdini	Rural	52,527	22,156	42%	85%	-	-	8	-	8	32	3	35	28	1	29	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
7 Otwal	Rural	33,589	23,286	69%	78%	-	-	25	-	25	24	-	24	36	-	36	6	-	6	-	-	-	-	1	1	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
8 Minakulu	Rural	48,954	28,706	59%	79%	-	-	21	2	23	17	4	21	37	17	54	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
9 Aleka	Rural	38,115	26,200	69%	79%	-	-	15	-	15	34	-	34	41	3	44	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Iceme	Rural	60,150	43,916	73%	84%	-	-	73	-	73	38	3	41	53	4	57	8	7	15	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	2	7	-	-	-	No
11 Abok	Rural	22,512	21,386	95%	81%	-	-	25	1	26	19	2	21	35	3	38	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Aber	Rural	42,999	26,000	60%	91%	-	-	2	-	2	17	5	22	62	2	64	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	134	-	-	No
Total		494,066	316,463	64	82	78	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No
District		494,066	316,463	64	82	78	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Unknown/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	9	8	1	0	2	6	0	0	0	0	0
Total	11	10	1	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

64%

82%

83

97%

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

64^%

82^%

97^%

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population