Oyam District

by December 4, 2024

The access rates in Oyam vary from 41 % in Oyam TC Sub-County to 95 % in Abok Sub-County. Oyam has 1,182 domestic water points which serve a total of 316,581 people – 270,595 in rural areas. 213 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Oyam has 2 piped schemes.

Access

59^%

Rural Functionality

82^%

Equity

104

Management

97^%

Gender

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ABK Abok 167

ALK Aleka 305

KMD Kamdini 282

NGI Ngai 209

ACB Acaba 215

LRO Loro 224

MYN Myene 194

MNK Minakulu 93

ICM Iceme 158

OTC Oyam TC 325

ABR Aber 164

Iceme TC Unknown

Kamdini TC Unknown

Loro TC Unknown

OTW Otwal 246

Minakulu TC Unknown

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 59 %

Rural Access 65 %

Urban Access 38 %

Kamdini TC NWSC

Loro TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 69 %

ICM Iceme 92 %

KMD Kamdini 42 %

LRO Loro 59 %

MNK Minakulu 49 %

MYN Myene 49 %

NGI Ngai 77 %

OTC Oyam TC 41 %

OTW Otwal 69 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 59 %

Rural Access 65 %

Urban Access 38 %

Kamdini TC NWSC

Loro TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 69 %

ICM Iceme 92 %

KMD Kamdini 42 %

LRO Loro 59 %

MNK Minakulu 49 %

MYN Myene 49 %

NGI Ngai 77 %

OTC Oyam TC 41 %

OTW Otwal 69 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 82 %

Urban Functionality 80 %

Kamdini TC NWSC

Loro TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 81 %

ABR Aber 91 %

ACB Acaba 91 %

ALK Aleka 80 %

ICM Iceme 86 %

KMD Kamdini 82 %

LRO Loro 72 %

MNK Minakulu 71 %

MYN Myene 81 %

NGI Ngai 88 %

OTC Oyam TC 78 %

OTW Otwal 78 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
OYAM
1 Oyam TC	Urban	15,209	6,256	41%	-	78%	-	1	1	2	3	1	4	14	1	15	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
2 Acaba	Rural	36,406	24,330	67%	91%	-	-	3	-	3	29	3	32	46	1	47	1	4	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Loro	Rural	65,867	38,948	59%	72%	-	-	5	2	7	38	18	56	57	12	69	1	7	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Loro TC	Urban	18,922	NWSC	NWSC	-	74%	-	-	1	1	12	4	16	11	-	11	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	Yes
5 Minakulu TC	Urban	31,612	NWSC	NWSC	-	83%	-	13	2	15	9	3	12	33	6	39	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
6 Otwal	Rural	33,772	23,286	69%	78%	-	-	19	5	24	19	3	22	33	6	39	-	6	6	-	-	-	-	1	1	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
7 Minakulu	Rural	21,437	10,406	49%	71%	-	-	5	2	7	4	3	7	18	5	23	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Iceme	Rural	40,358	36,998	92%	86%	-	-	52	9	61	26	2	28	51	3	54	-	8	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
9 Ngai	Rural	37,484	28,906	77%	88%	-	-	32	3	35	25	2	27	38	7	45	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
10 Myene	Rural	35,688	17,612	49%	81%	-	-	7	3	10	16	6	22	29	1	30	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Kamdini	Rural	38,682	16,306	42%	82%	-	-	4	1	5	18	7	25	25	1	26	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Kamdini TC	Urban	23,951	NWSC	NWSC	-	91%	-	2	2	4	10	-	10	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	134	-	-	Yes
13 Aleka	Rural	38,322	26,500	69%	80%	-	-	10	4	14	26	7	33	38	8	46	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Iceme TC	Urban	31,017	NWSC	NWSC	-	75%	-	7	2	9	5	3	8	6	-	6	-	3	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	Yes
15 Abok	Rural	22,634	21,502	95%	81%	-	-	23	3	26	17	6	23	31	7	38	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
16 Aber	Rural	43,232	25,800	60%	91%	-	-	-	-	-	14	6	20	64	2	66	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		534,593	316,581	59	82	80	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No
District		534,593	316,581	59	82	80	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Unknown/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	9	8	1	0	2	6	0	0	0	0	0
Total	11	10	1	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

59%

82%

104

97%

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

59^%

82^%

97^%

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population