Oyam District

by July 26, 2024

The access rates in Oyam vary from 42 % in Oyam TC Sub-County to 95 % in Abok Sub-County. Oyam has 1,182 domestic water points which serve a total of 316,379 people – 270,393 in rural areas. 213 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Oyam has 2 piped schemes.

Access

60^%

Rural Functionality

82^%

Equity

103

Management

97^%

Gender

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

ALK Aleka 303

KMD Kamdini 279

ABK Abok 166

ACB Acaba 213

LRO Loro 222

NGI Ngai 207

MYN Myene 193

MNK Minakulu 92

ICM Iceme 157

OTC Oyam TC 322

ABR Aber 163

Iceme TC Unknown

OTW Otwal 244

Kamdini TC Unknown

Minakulu TC Unknown

Loro TC Unknown

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 60 %

Rural Access 66 %

Urban Access 38 %

Loro TC NWSC

Kamdini TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 70 %

ICM Iceme 93 %

KMD Kamdini 43 %

LRO Loro 60 %

MNK Minakulu 49 %

MYN Myene 50 %

NGI Ngai 78 %

OTC Oyam TC 42 %

OTW Otwal 70 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 60 %

Rural Access 66 %

Urban Access 38 %

Loro TC NWSC

Kamdini TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 95 %

ABR Aber 60 %

ACB Acaba 67 %

ALK Aleka 70 %

ICM Iceme 93 %

KMD Kamdini 43 %

LRO Loro 60 %

MNK Minakulu 49 %

MYN Myene 50 %

NGI Ngai 78 %

OTC Oyam TC 42 %

OTW Otwal 70 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 82 %

Urban Functionality 80 %

Loro TC NWSC

Kamdini TC NWSC

Iceme TC NWSC

ABK Abok 81 %

ABR Aber 91 %

ACB Acaba 91 %

ALK Aleka 80 %

ICM Iceme 86 %

KMD Kamdini 82 %

LRO Loro 72 %

MNK Minakulu 71 %

MYN Myene 81 %

NGI Ngai 88 %

OTC Oyam TC 78 %

OTW Otwal 78 %

Minakulu TC NWSC

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
OYAM
1 Ngai	Rural	37,134	28,906	78%	88%	-	-	32	3	35	25	2	27	38	7	45	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
2 Oyam TC	Urban	15,067	6,256	42%	-	78%	-	1	1	2	3	1	4	14	1	15	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
3 Myene	Rural	35,354	17,612	50%	81%	-	-	7	3	10	16	6	22	29	1	30	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Acaba	Rural	36,066	24,330	67%	91%	-	-	3	-	3	29	3	32	46	1	47	1	4	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Loro	Rural	65,251	38,948	60%	72%	-	-	5	2	7	38	18	56	57	12	69	1	7	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Kamdini	Rural	38,320	16,306	43%	82%	-	-	4	1	5	18	7	25	25	1	26	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Loro TC	Urban	18,745	NWSC	NWSC	-	74%	-	-	1	1	12	4	16	11	-	11	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	Yes
8 Minakulu TC	Urban	31,268	NWSC	NWSC	-	83%	-	13	2	15	9	3	12	33	6	39	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
9 Kamdini TC	Urban	23,728	NWSC	NWSC	-	91%	-	2	2	4	10	-	10	7	-	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	134	-	-	Yes
10 Otwal	Rural	33,456	23,286	70%	78%	-	-	19	5	24	19	3	22	33	6	39	-	6	6	-	-	-	-	1	1	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
11 Minakulu	Rural	21,236	10,406	49%	71%	-	-	5	2	7	4	3	7	18	5	23	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Aleka	Rural	37,964	26,500	70%	80%	-	-	10	4	14	26	7	33	38	8	46	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
13 Iceme TC	Urban	30,727	NWSC	NWSC	-	75%	-	7	2	9	5	3	8	6	-	6	-	3	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	Yes
14 Iceme	Rural	39,981	36,998	93%	86%	-	-	52	9	61	26	2	28	51	3	54	-	8	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
15 Abok	Rural	22,423	21,302	95%	81%	-	-	23	3	26	17	6	23	31	7	38	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
16 Aber	Rural	42,829	25,800	60%	91%	-	-	-	-	-	14	6	20	64	2	66	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		529,549	316,379	60	82	80	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No
District		529,549	316,379	60	82	80	0	183	40	223	271	74	345	501	60	561	3	37	40	0	0	0	0	1	1	11	2	13	134	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Unknown/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	9	8	1	0	2	6	0	0	0	0	0
Total	11	10	1	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

60%

82%

103

97%

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

60^%

82^%

97^%

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population