Kole District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Kole vary from 48 % in Okwerodot Sub-County to 95 % in Ayer TC (Kole TC) Sub-County. Kole has 904 domestic water points which serve a total of 222,497 people – 211,595 in rural areas. 169 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kole has 1 piped schemes.
Access
72%
Rural Functionality
81%
Equity
64
Management
96%
Gender
97%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 330
Population 309
Population 313
Population 333
Population 281
Population 274
Population 310
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 44,884
Population Served 30,584
Population Served 43,022
Population Served 31,116
Population Served 40,678
Population Served 10,902
Population Served 21,312
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 44,884
Population Served 30,584
Population Served 43,022
Population Served 31,116
Population Served 40,678
Population Served 10,902
Population Served 21,312
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 140
Functional Sources 96
Functional Sources 127
Functional Sources 88
Functional Sources 130
Functional Sources 41
Functional Sources 59
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | KOLE | ||||||||
| 1 Aboke | Rural | 60,370 | 44,884 | 74% | 81% | - | - | 27 | 8 | 35 | 31 | 7 | 38 | 68 | 6 | 74 | 7 | 7 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 7 | 14 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Okwerodot | Rural | 44,590 | 21,312 | 48% | 85% | - | 100% | 30 | 8 | 38 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 16 | 3 | 19 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 1 | 2 | No |
| 3 Alito | Rural | 50,926 | 43,022 | 84% | 74% | - | 100% | 49 | 24 | 73 | 30 | 2 | 32 | 41 | 12 | 53 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 4 | 1 | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Akalo | Rural | 37,418 | 30,584 | 82% | 82% | - | - | 29 | 2 | 31 | 28 | 1 | 29 | 38 | 7 | 45 | 1 | 13 | 14 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Ayer TC (Kole TC) | Urban | 11,476 | 10,902 | 95% | - | 80% | - | 4 | - | 4 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Bala | Rural | 59,175 | 40,678 | 69% | 89% | - | 75% | 26 | - | 26 | 59 | 2 | 61 | 43 | 5 | 48 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 3 | - | 3 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Ayer | Rural | 45,905 | 31,116 | 68% | 82% | - | 100% | 11 | 1 | 12 | 32 | 7 | 39 | 43 | 3 | 46 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 309,860 | 222,497 | 72 | 81 | 80 | 67 | 176 | 43 | 219 | 209 | 25 | 234 | 321 | 39 | 360 | 17 | 54 | 71 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 2 | No | |
| District | 309,860 | 222,497 | 72 | 81 | 80 | 67 | 176 | 43 | 219 | 209 | 25 | 234 | 321 | 39 | 360 | 17 | 54 | 71 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 2 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee