Agago District

by April 17, 2024

The access rates in Agago vary from 58 % in WOL T.C Sub-County to 95 % in Lokole Sub-County. Agago has 1,396 domestic water points which serve a total of 235,898 people – 200,703 in rural areas. 627 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Agago has 2 piped schemes.

Access

85%

Rural Functionality

55%

Equity

68

Management

98%

Gender

87%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
LKL Lokole 43
Lokole
Population 43
KTM Kotomor 91
Kotomor
Population 91
PRB Parabong 60
Parabong
Population 60
KTC Kalongo TC 511
Kalongo TC
Population 511
ARM Arum 68
Arum
Population 68
AGENGO Unknown
AGENGO
Population 0
AJALI Unknown
AJALI
Population 0
GEREGERE Unknown
GEREGERE
Population 0
KUYWEE Unknown
KUYWEE
Population 0
LAPEREBONG Unknown
LAPEREBONG
Population 0
LIRA KATO Unknown
LIRA KATO
Population 0
ADILANG T.C Unknown
ADILANG T.C
Population 0
LIRA PALWO T.C Unknown
LIRA PALWO T.C
Population 0
LPL Lira Palwo 24
Lira Palwo
Population 24
OMT Omot 58
Omot
Population 58
ATC Agago TC 141
Agago TC
Population 141
PTN Patongo 111
Patongo
Population 111
LAI-MUTTO T.C Unknown
LAI-MUTTO T.C
Population 0
OPC Omiya Pacwa 42
Omiya Pacwa
Population 42
PML Paimol 21
Paimol
Population 21
WOL T.C Unknown
WOL T.C
Population 0
PTC Patongo TC 391
Patongo TC
Population 391
WOL Wol 13
Wol
Population 13
ADL Adilang 47
Adilang
Population 47
LMY Lamiyo 72
Lamiyo
Population 72
LPN Lapono 34
Lapono
Population 34

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 85 %
Rural Access 87 %
Urban Access 75 %

LAI-MUTTO T.C 63 %
LAI-MUTTO T.C
Population Served 12,530
AJALI 95 %
AJALI
Population Served 8,485
GEREGERE 95 %
GEREGERE
Population Served 9,323
KUYWEE 95 %
KUYWEE
Population Served 10,685
LAPEREBONG Unknown
LAPEREBONG
Population Served Unknown
LIRA KATO 95 %
LIRA KATO
Population Served 11,418
ADILANG T.C 95 %
ADILANG T.C
Population Served 3,247
LIRA PALWO T.C Unknown
LIRA PALWO T.C
Population Served Unknown
AGENGO 95 %
AGENGO
Population Served 5,762
ADL Adilang 78 %
Adilang
Population Served 13,503
ARM Arum 95 %
Arum
Population Served 12,885
ATC Agago TC 95 %
Agago TC
Population Served 6,600
KTC Kalongo TC 95 %
Kalongo TC
Population Served 12,675
KTM Kotomor 95 %
Kotomor
Population Served 13,827
LKL Lokole 95 %
Lokole
Population Served 10,370
LMY Lamiyo 95 %
Lamiyo
Population Served 9,323
LPL Lira Palwo 95 %
Lira Palwo
Population Served 4,714
LPN Lapono 95 %
Lapono
Population Served 15,294
OMT Omot 95 %
Omot
Population Served 6,809
OPC Omiya Pacwa 95 %
Omiya Pacwa
Population Served 12,675
PML Paimol 95 %
Paimol
Population Served 6,285
PRB Parabong 95 %
Parabong
Population Served 12,466
PTC Patongo TC 95 %
Patongo TC
Population Served 12,675
PTN Patongo 95 %
Patongo
Population Served 12,047
WOL Wol 95 %
Wol
Population Served 5,971
WOL T.C 58 %
WOL T.C
Population Served 6,330

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 85 %
Rural Access 87 %
Urban Access 75 %

LAI-MUTTO T.C 63 %
LAI-MUTTO T.C
Population Served 12,530
AJALI 95 %
AJALI
Population Served 8,485
GEREGERE 95 %
GEREGERE
Population Served 9,323
KUYWEE 95 %
KUYWEE
Population Served 10,685
LAPEREBONG Unknown
LAPEREBONG
Population Served Unknown
LIRA KATO 95 %
LIRA KATO
Population Served 11,418
ADILANG T.C 95 %
ADILANG T.C
Population Served 3,247
LIRA PALWO T.C Unknown
LIRA PALWO T.C
Population Served Unknown
AGENGO 95 %
AGENGO
Population Served 5,762
ADL Adilang 78 %
Adilang
Population Served 13,503
ARM Arum 95 %
Arum
Population Served 12,885
ATC Agago TC 95 %
Agago TC
Population Served 6,600
KTC Kalongo TC 95 %
Kalongo TC
Population Served 12,675
KTM Kotomor 95 %
Kotomor
Population Served 13,827
LKL Lokole 95 %
Lokole
Population Served 10,370
LMY Lamiyo 95 %
Lamiyo
Population Served 9,323
LPL Lira Palwo 95 %
Lira Palwo
Population Served 4,714
LPN Lapono 95 %
Lapono
Population Served 15,294
OMT Omot 95 %
Omot
Population Served 6,809
OPC Omiya Pacwa 95 %
Omiya Pacwa
Population Served 12,675
PML Paimol 95 %
Paimol
Population Served 6,285
PRB Parabong 95 %
Parabong
Population Served 12,466
PTC Patongo TC 95 %
Patongo TC
Population Served 12,675
PTN Patongo 95 %
Patongo
Population Served 12,047
WOL Wol 95 %
Wol
Population Served 5,971
WOL T.C 58 %
WOL T.C
Population Served 6,330

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 55 %
Urban Functionality 55 %

LAI-MUTTO T.C 31 %
LAI-MUTTO T.C
Functional Sources 15
AJALI 46 %
AJALI
Functional Sources 18
GEREGERE 58 %
GEREGERE
Functional Sources 22
KUYWEE 55 %
KUYWEE
Functional Sources 34
LAPEREBONG Unknown
LAPEREBONG
Functional Sources Unknown
LIRA KATO 63 %
LIRA KATO
Functional Sources 31
ADILANG T.C 46 %
ADILANG T.C
Functional Sources 16
LIRA PALWO T.C Unknown
LIRA PALWO T.C
Functional Sources Unknown
AGENGO 85 %
AGENGO
Functional Sources 44
ADL Adilang 61 %
Adilang
Functional Sources 28
ARM Arum 57 %
Arum
Functional Sources 50
ATC Agago TC 76 %
Agago TC
Functional Sources 29
KTC Kalongo TC 41 %
Kalongo TC
Functional Sources 27
KTM Kotomor 55 %
Kotomor
Functional Sources 39
LKL Lokole 54 %
Lokole
Functional Sources 22
LMY Lamiyo 74 %
Lamiyo
Functional Sources 40
LPL Lira Palwo 72 %
Lira Palwo
Functional Sources 42
LPN Lapono 56 %
Lapono
Functional Sources 49
OMT Omot 47 %
Omot
Functional Sources 20
OPC Omiya Pacwa 50 %
Omiya Pacwa
Functional Sources 43
PML Paimol 35 %
Paimol
Functional Sources 25
PRB Parabong 51 %
Parabong
Functional Sources 44
PTC Patongo TC 63 %
Patongo TC
Functional Sources 36
PTN Patongo 57 %
Patongo
Functional Sources 40
WOL Wol 49 %
Wol
Functional Sources 21
WOL T.C 44 %
WOL T.C
Functional Sources 12

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
AGAGO                               
 1 PatongoRural12,68112,04795%57%---11369371552-77-11----11---No
 2 Agago TCUrban6,9476,60095%-76%-------28735-11------112---No
 3 ADILANG T.CUrban3,4183,24795%-46%-------121527-11------437---No
 4 AdilangRural17,42213,50378%61%-----213261642-11-11---------No
 5 KotomorRural14,55513,82795%55%---33-99391554-55------------No
 6 Patongo TCUrban13,34212,67595%-63%----371028230-77------5510---No
 7 AJALIRural8,9328,48595%46%------33181028-88-11---------No
 8 LokoleRural10,91610,37095%54%--------221234-55-------22---No
 9 LAPEREBONGRural4,74100%---------------------------No
Total 92,95480,75487556200449263523111034103535033011101222000No
AGAGO WEST                                
 1 GEREGERERural9,8149,32395%58%------11221436-11------------No
 2 OmotRural7,1676,80995%47%--44815614822-22------145---No
 3 AGENGORural6,0655,76295%85%-----13442446112------------No
 4 LamiyoRural9,8149,32395%74%-----12-1228937-44-------11---No
 5 Lira PalwoRural4,9624,71495%72%-----191041546-22------------No
 6 ArumRural13,56312,88595%57%--6-69514332154189------145---No
 7 LIRA PALWO T.CUrban9,59300%---------------------------No
Total 60,97848,8168065001041424234718061241218200000002911000No
AGAGO NORTH                               
 1 PaimolRural6,6166,28595%35%---11-1010252348-1212-11---------No
 2 ParabongRural13,12212,46695%51%------88441559-66-------1313---No
 3 LaponoRural16,09915,29495%56%-----167481159-1010-11----1212---No
 4 KUYWEERural11,24710,68595%55%------44342155-33-44---------No
 5 WOL T.CRural10,8826,33058%44%------2210818-55-11---2-2---No
 6 Kalongo TCUrban13,34212,67595%-41%----51520201636112------178---No
 7 LIRA KATORural12,01911,41895%63%------4431435-44-------66---No
 8 LAI-MUTTO T.CRural19,95812,53063%31%---11189141832-66-11---------No
 9 WolRural6,2855,97195%49%-----112201434-77-22---------No
 10 Omiya PacwaRural13,34212,67595%50%-----41418392766-22------------No
Total 122,912106,3288749410022127284285157442156570101000033841000No
District 276,844235,8988555550101020451211666963281,024310911201313011155974000No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Not GFS22000100000
Total22000100000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee