Agago District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Agago vary from 95 % in Lokole Sub-County to 95 % in Lokole Sub-County. Agago has 1,372 domestic water points which serve a total of 251,010 people – 218,843 in rural areas. 318 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Agago has 2 piped schemes.

Access

95^%

Rural Functionality

77^%

Equity

17

Management

99^%

Gender

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

LKL Lokole 72

KTM Kotomor 92

PRB Parabong 60

KTC Kalongo TC 514

LPL Lira Palwo 91

OMT Omot 126

PTN Patongo 112

PML Paimol 77

ARM Arum 68

ATC Agago TC 142

OPC Omiya Pacwa 42

PTC Patongo TC 394

ADL Adilang 63

WOL Wol 56

LMY Lamiyo 72

LPN Lapono 53

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 95 %

Rural Access 95 %

Urban Access 95 %

ADL Adilang 95 %

ARM Arum 95 %

ATC Agago TC 95 %

KTC Kalongo TC 95 %

KTM Kotomor 95 %

LKL Lokole 95 %

LMY Lamiyo 95 %

LPL Lira Palwo 95 %

LPN Lapono 95 %

OMT Omot 95 %

OPC Omiya Pacwa 95 %

PML Paimol 95 %

PRB Parabong 95 %

PTC Patongo TC 95 %

PTN Patongo 95 %

WOL Wol 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 95 %

Rural Access 95 %

Urban Access 95 %

ADL Adilang 95 %

ARM Arum 95 %

ATC Agago TC 95 %

KTC Kalongo TC 95 %

KTM Kotomor 95 %

LKL Lokole 95 %

LMY Lamiyo 95 %

LPL Lira Palwo 95 %

LPN Lapono 95 %

OMT Omot 95 %

OPC Omiya Pacwa 95 %

PML Paimol 95 %

PRB Parabong 95 %

PTC Patongo TC 95 %

PTN Patongo 95 %

WOL Wol 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 77 %

Urban Functionality 75 %

ADL Adilang 66 %

ARM Arum 63 %

ATC Agago TC 88 %

KTC Kalongo TC 67 %

KTM Kotomor 80 %

LKL Lokole 94 %

LMY Lamiyo 78 %

LPL Lira Palwo 77 %

LPN Lapono 60 %

OMT Omot 78 %

OPC Omiya Pacwa 42 %

PML Paimol 75 %

PRB Parabong 75 %

PTC Patongo TC 64 %

PTN Patongo 85 %

WOL Wol 65 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
AGAGO
1 Paimol	Rural	24,424	23,203	95%	73%	-	100%	1	1	2	11	7	18	58	18	76	16	2	18	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Patongo	Rural	12,767	12,129	95%	83%	-	100%	1	-	1	7	2	9	42	5	47	4	3	7	1	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
3 Parabong	Rural	13,211	12,550	95%	77%	-	-	-	-	-	6	2	8	47	7	54	4	2	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	9	13	-	-	-	No
4 Omot	Rural	15,542	14,765	95%	78%	-	-	6	2	8	5	2	7	44	7	51	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	3	5	-	-	-	No
5 Lapono	Rural	25,534	24,257	95%	73%	-	100%	-	-	-	5	6	11	59	29	88	8	6	14	-	1	1	-	-	-	6	12	18	-	-	-	No
6 Agago TC	Urban	6,994	6,644	95%	-	71%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	28	3	31	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
7 Adilang	Rural	23,425	22,254	95%	73%	-	-	-	-	-	4	1	5	69	36	105	1	1	2	1	-	1	1	-	1	5	2	7	-	-	-	No
8 Kalongo TC	Urban	13,433	12,761	95%	-	82%	-	-	-	-	11	8	19	27	8	35	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	7	-	-	-	No
9 Lamiyo	Rural	9,881	9,387	95%	83%	-	-	-	-	-	9	2	11	28	6	34	2	2	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
10 Kotomor	Rural	14,654	13,921	95%	86%	-	-	3	-	3	5	4	9	40	8	48	4	1	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Wol	Rural	26,866	25,523	95%	76%	-	100%	-	-	-	2	6	8	80	25	105	2	13	15	-	7	7	-	-	-	-	2	2	-	-	-	No
12 Patongo TC	Urban	13,433	12,761	95%	-	70%	-	-	-	-	1	8	9	27	3	30	5	2	7	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	7	10	-	-	-	No
13 Omiya Pacwa	Rural	13,433	12,761	95%	79%	-	-	-	-	-	3	15	18	29	29	58	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Lokole	Rural	18,096	17,191	95%	80%	-	100%	-	-	-	3	-	3	56	3	59	12	1	13	1	-	1	-	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	No
15 Lira Palwo	Rural	18,873	17,929	95%	89%	-	-	-	-	-	2	4	6	72	17	89	2	2	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
16 Arum	Rural	13,655	12,972	95%	59%	-	-	6	1	7	10	4	14	30	19	49	5	4	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	3	5	-	-	-	No
Total		264,221	251,010	95	77	75	86	7	13	20	128	38	166	877	124	1,001	17	95	112	12	1	13	0	1	1	25	48	73	0	0	0	No
District		264,221	251,010	95	77	75	86	7	13	20	128	38	166	877	124	1,001	17	95	112	12	1	13	0	1	1	25	48	73	0	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Total	2	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

95%

77%

17

99%

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

95^%

77^%

99^%

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population