Amuria District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Amuria vary from 51 % in Akeriau Sub-County to 83 % in Apeduru Sub-County. Amuria has 549 domestic water points which serve a total of 164,008 people – 158,411 in rural areas. 38 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Amuria has 6 piped schemes.
Access
67%
Rural Functionality
93%
Equity
53
Management
70%
Gender
85%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 228
Population 208
Population 208
Population 161
Population 222
Population 143
Population 190
Population 217
Population 182
Population 151
Population 341
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 22,500
Population Served 9,700
Population Served 16,200
Population Served 20,200
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 17,312
Population Served 16,500
Population Served 13,600
Population Served 10,900
Population Served 20,400
Population Served 11,100
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 22,500
Population Served 9,700
Population Served 16,200
Population Served 20,200
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 17,312
Population Served 16,500
Population Served 13,600
Population Served 10,900
Population Served 20,400
Population Served 11,100
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 72
Functional Sources 28
Functional Sources 54
Functional Sources 65
Functional Sources 12
Functional Sources 53
Functional Sources 55
Functional Sources 43
Functional Sources 33
Functional Sources 66
Functional Sources 30
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | AMURIA | ||||||||
| 1 Orungo | Rural | 19,629 | 10,900 | 56% | 89% | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 3 | - | 3 | 30 | 2 | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Amuria TC | Urban | 9,693 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 3 Asamuk | Rural | 28,352 | 20,200 | 71% | 94% | - | 75% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 51 | 1 | 52 | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Apeduru | Rural | 19,507 | 16,200 | 83% | 98% | - | 67% | 3 | - | 3 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 44 | - | 44 | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Wera | Rural | 31,987 | 20,400 | 64% | 97% | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 2 | 10 | 58 | - | 58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Abarilela | Rural | 31,987 | 22,500 | 70% | 96% | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66 | - | 66 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Ogolai | Rural | 18,417 | 13,600 | 74% | 91% | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | - | 7 | 35 | - | 35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Morungatuny | Rural | 22,779 | 16,500 | 72% | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | 6 | 49 | - | 49 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Willa | Rural | 17,811 | 11,100 | 62% | 81% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 7 | 8 | 29 | - | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Kuju | Rural | 23,990 | 17,312 | 72% | 87% | - | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 47 | - | 47 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Akeriau | Rural | 18,902 | 9,700 | 51% | 85% | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 25 | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 243,054 | 164,008 | 67 | 93 | 100 | 71 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 56 | 22 | 78 | 445 | 3 | 448 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 243,054 | 164,008 | 67 | 93 | 100 | 71 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 56 | 22 | 78 | 445 | 3 | 448 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee