Nebbi District
by May 14, 2025
The access rates in Nebbi vary from 26 % in Alala Sub-County to 95 % in Kucwiny Sub-County. Nebbi has 916 domestic water points which serve a total of 212,347 people – 201,441 in rural areas. 230 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Nebbi has 2 piped schemes.
Access
69%
Rural Functionality
73%
Equity
181
Management
99%
Gender
88%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 397
Population 331
Population 70
Population 307
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 275
Population 518
Population 212
Population 245
Population 175
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 7,212
Population Served 9,012
Population Served 8,265
Population Served 3,600
Population Served 22,230
Population Served 9,312
Population Served 36,404
Population Served 18,596
Population Served 15,030
Population Served 20,424
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 24,633
Population Served 13,518
Population Served 13,206
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 7,212
Population Served 9,012
Population Served 8,265
Population Served 3,600
Population Served 22,230
Population Served 9,312
Population Served 36,404
Population Served 18,596
Population Served 15,030
Population Served 20,424
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 24,633
Population Served 13,518
Population Served 13,206
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 24
Functional Sources 37
Functional Sources 11
Functional Sources 61
Functional Sources 26
Functional Sources 121
Functional Sources 71
Functional Sources 43
Functional Sources 70
Functional Sources 73
Functional Sources 59
Functional Sources 36
Functional Sources 34
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | PADYERE | ||||||||
| 1 Atego | Rural | 13,050 | 9,312 | 71% | 76% | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | 24 | 5 | 29 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Erussi | Rural | 45,796 | 36,404 | 79% | 70% | - | - | 83 | 35 | 118 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 25 | 5 | 30 | 4 | 5 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Parombo | Rural | 19,817 | 13,518 | 68% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 35 | 8 | 43 | - | 3 | 3 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 PADWOT | Rural | 16,071 | 7,212 | 45% | 77% | - | 50% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 6 | 24 | 2 | - | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Nyaravur | Rural | 26,946 | 24,633 | 91% | 67% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 55 | 27 | 82 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Akworo | Rural | 33,229 | 22,230 | 67% | 77% | - | 100% | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 58 | 13 | 71 | - | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Nebbi M.C | Urban | 11,479 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 91% | - | - | - | - | 7 | 1 | 8 | 61 | 6 | 67 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 8 Nebbi | Rural | 38,184 | 15,030 | 39% | 78% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 8 | 48 | 2 | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 JUPANGIRA | Rural | 8,700 | 8,265 | 95% | 60% | - | - | 19 | 13 | 32 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 20 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Ndhew | Rural | 27,429 | 20,424 | 74% | 80% | - | - | 45 | 3 | 48 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 PAROMBO T.C | Rural | 18,608 | 9,012 | 48% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 5 | 27 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 ACANA | Rural | 15,099 | 13,206 | 87% | 76% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 32 | 10 | 42 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kucwiny | Rural | 19,575 | 18,596 | 95% | 75% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 62 | 20 | 82 | 9 | 4 | 13 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Alala | Rural | 14,017 | 3,600 | 26% | 92% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 308,000 | 212,347 | 69 | 73 | 91 | 78 | 149 | 52 | 201 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 477 | 129 | 606 | 24 | 32 | 56 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 308,000 | 212,347 | 69 | 73 | 91 | 78 | 149 | 52 | 201 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 477 | 129 | 606 | 24 | 32 | 56 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee