Amolatar District

by March 18, 2024

The access rates in Amolatar vary from 58 % in Namasale TC Sub-County to 95 % in Aputi Sub-County. Amolatar has 618 domestic water points which serve a total of 168,024 people – 146,214 in rural areas. 127 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Amolatar has 1 piped schemes.

Access

78%

Rural Functionality

80%

Equity

41

Management

92%

Gender

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
NMS Namasale 110
Namasale
Population 110
Nalubwoyo Unknown
Nalubwoyo
Population 0
NTC Namasale TC 419
Namasale TC
Population 419
AKW Akwon 276
Akwon
Population 276
Abeja Unknown
Abeja
Population 0
AGK Agikdak 244
Agikdak
Population 244
AGW Agwingiri 184
Agwingiri
Population 184
ATC Amolatar TC 300
Amolatar TC
Population 300
APT Aputi 203
Aputi
Population 203
ARW Arwotcek 233
Arwotcek
Population 233
AWL Awelo 253
Awelo
Population 253
ETM Etam 217
Etam
Population 217
MNT Muntu 177
Muntu
Population 177

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 78 %
Rural Access 79 %
Urban Access 77 %

Nalubwoyo Unknown
Nalubwoyo
Population Served Unknown
Abeja Unknown
Abeja
Population Served Unknown
AGK Agikdak 95 %
Agikdak
Population Served 13,537
AGW Agwingiri 81 %
Agwingiri
Population Served 16,812
AKW Akwon 91 %
Akwon
Population Served 9,306
APT Aputi 95 %
Aputi
Population Served 18,769
ARW Arwotcek 78 %
Arwotcek
Population Served 17,130
ATC Amolatar TC 95 %
Amolatar TC
Population Served 13,992
AWL Awelo 90 %
Awelo
Population Served 13,600
ETM Etam 92 %
Etam
Population Served 17,818
MNT Muntu 95 %
Muntu
Population Served 16,494
NMS Namasale 86 %
Namasale
Population Served 22,748
NTC Namasale TC 58 %
Namasale TC
Population Served 7,818

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 78 %
Rural Access 79 %
Urban Access 77 %

Nalubwoyo Unknown
Nalubwoyo
Population Served Unknown
Abeja Unknown
Abeja
Population Served Unknown
AGK Agikdak 95 %
Agikdak
Population Served 13,537
AGW Agwingiri 81 %
Agwingiri
Population Served 16,812
AKW Akwon 91 %
Akwon
Population Served 9,306
APT Aputi 95 %
Aputi
Population Served 18,769
ARW Arwotcek 78 %
Arwotcek
Population Served 17,130
ATC Amolatar TC 95 %
Amolatar TC
Population Served 13,992
AWL Awelo 90 %
Awelo
Population Served 13,600
ETM Etam 92 %
Etam
Population Served 17,818
MNT Muntu 95 %
Muntu
Population Served 16,494
NMS Namasale 86 %
Namasale
Population Served 22,748
NTC Namasale TC 58 %
Namasale TC
Population Served 7,818

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 80 %
Urban Functionality 75 %

Nalubwoyo Unknown
Nalubwoyo
Functional Sources Unknown
Abeja Unknown
Abeja
Functional Sources Unknown
AGK Agikdak 89 %
Agikdak
Functional Sources 48
AGW Agwingiri 78 %
Agwingiri
Functional Sources 45
AKW Akwon 91 %
Akwon
Functional Sources 29
APT Aputi 76 %
Aputi
Functional Sources 56
ARW Arwotcek 66 %
Arwotcek
Functional Sources 41
ATC Amolatar TC 71 %
Amolatar TC
Functional Sources 37
AWL Awelo 91 %
Awelo
Functional Sources 42
ETM Etam 73 %
Etam
Functional Sources 46
MNT Muntu 83 %
Muntu
Functional Sources 53
NMS Namasale 83 %
Namasale
Functional Sources 70
NTC Namasale TC 83 %
Namasale TC
Functional Sources 24

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
KIOGA                               
 1 Namasale TCUrban13,5317,81858%-83%----2-222224-33------------No
 2 AputiRural19,75718,76995%76%--------551368156-22---------No
 3 ArwotcekRural21,91217,13078%66%-50%----55411152-55112---------No
 4 AgikdakRural14,24913,53795%89%-100%------48452-221-1---------No
 5 AkwonRural10,1789,30691%91%--------29231-11-11---------No
 6 Amolatar TCUrban14,72813,99295%-71%-------37744-22-11----66---No
 7 AweloRural15,08713,60090%91%--112---41344----11---------No
 8 EtamRural19,27817,81892%73%--112---451358-33-33---------No
 9 MuntuRural17,36216,49495%83%-----2-250959123---------3041No
 10 AgwingiriRural20,83516,81281%78%------11451055-22------------No
 11 NamasaleRural26,58222,74886%83%--1-1-1169574-88------------No
 12 AbejaRural9,22000%---------------------------No
 13 NalubwoyoRural11,37500%---------------------------No
Total 214,094168,024788075183254711482795612333529110000663041No
District 214,094168,024788075183254711482795612333529110000663041No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Not GFS11000000010
Surface Water Based/Not GFS10100100000
Total21100100010

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee