Amolatar District

by April 28, 2024

The access rates in Amolatar vary from 19 % in Acii Sub-County to 95 % in Muntu Sub-County. Amolatar has 545 domestic water points which serve a total of 152,175 people – 132,051 in rural areas. 121 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Amolatar has 1 piped schemes.

Access

65^%

Rural Functionality

79^%

Equity

187

Management

96^%

Gender

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

NMS Namasale 111

Nalubwoyo Unknown

NTC Namasale TC 421

AKW Akwon 277

Abeja Unknown

AGK Agikdak 246

Opali Unknown

AGW Agwingiri 185

ATC Amolatar TC 302

APT Aputi 205

ARW Arwotcek 234

AWL Awelo 255

ETM Etam 219

MNT Muntu 178

Acii Unknown

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 65 %

Rural Access 64 %

Urban Access 71 %

Opali 62 %

Nalubwoyo 52 %

Abeja 52 %

AGK Agikdak 84 %

AGW Agwingiri 36 %

AKW Akwon 85 %

APT Aputi 57 %

ARW Arwotcek 50 %

ATC Amolatar TC 91 %

AWL Awelo 78 %

ETM Etam 76 %

MNT Muntu 95 %

NMS Namasale 73 %

NTC Namasale TC 49 %

Acii 19 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 65 %

Rural Access 64 %

Urban Access 71 %

Opali 62 %

Nalubwoyo 52 %

Abeja 52 %

AGK Agikdak 84 %

AGW Agwingiri 36 %

AKW Akwon 85 %

APT Aputi 57 %

ARW Arwotcek 50 %

ATC Amolatar TC 91 %

AWL Awelo 78 %

ETM Etam 76 %

MNT Muntu 95 %

NMS Namasale 73 %

NTC Namasale TC 49 %

Acii 19 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 79 %

Urban Functionality 70 %

Opali 62 %

Nalubwoyo 67 %

Abeja 44 %

AGK Agikdak 86 %

AGW Agwingiri 81 %

AKW Akwon 90 %

APT Aputi 83 %

ARW Arwotcek 73 %

ATC Amolatar TC 68 %

AWL Awelo 95 %

ETM Etam 72 %

MNT Muntu 83 %

NMS Namasale 79 %

NTC Namasale TC 75 %

Acii 100 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
KIOGA
1 Namasale TC	Urban	13,616	6,612	49%	-	75%	-	-	-	-	1	1	2	15	5	20	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Aputi	Rural	19,881	11,415	57%	83%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	34	4	38	-	3	3	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Arwotcek	Rural	22,050	11,124	50%	73%	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	29	4	33	1	3	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Agikdak	Rural	14,339	12,012	84%	86%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	-	-	36	4	40	-	2	2	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Akwon	Rural	10,242	8,706	85%	90%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	-	-	26	3	29	1	-	1	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Nalubwoyo	Rural	11,447	6,006	52%	67%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	6	20	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Acii	Rural	7,919	1,500	19%	100%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Amolatar TC	Urban	14,821	13,512	91%	-	68%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	34	8	42	-	2	2	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	6	6	-	-	-	No
9 Awelo	Rural	15,182	11,800	78%	95%	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	37	1	38	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Etam	Rural	19,399	14,824	76%	72%	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	38	10	48	-	4	4	-	3	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Abeja	Rural	9,278	4,812	52%	44%	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	8	7	15	-	2	2	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Muntu	Rural	17,472	16,598	95%	83%	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	2	46	8	54	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	30	4	1	No
13 Agwingiri	Rural	20,966	7,506	36%	81%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	4	25	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Namasale	Rural	26,750	19,448	73%	79%	-	-	1	-	1	-	1	1	57	6	63	-	8	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
15 Opali	Rural	10,121	6,300	62%	62%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	8	21	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		233,483	152,175	65	79	70	20	3	2	5	3	7	10	413	78	491	5	28	33	2	8	10	0	0	0	0	6	6	30	4	1	No
District		233,483	152,175	65	79	70	20	3	2	5	3	7	10	413	78	491	5	28	33	2	8	10	0	0	0	0	6	6	30	4	1	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
Total	2	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

65%

79%

187

96%

100%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

65^%

79^%

96^%

100^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population