Amolatar District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Amolatar vary from 57 % in Namasale TC Sub-County to 95 % in Aputi Sub-County. Amolatar has 613 domestic water points which serve a total of 168,456 people – 146,525 in rural areas. 126 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Amolatar has 1 piped schemes.
Access
85%
Rural Functionality
78%
Equity
29
Management
91%
Gender
99%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 113
Population 207
Population 258
Population 180
Population 427
Population 237
Population 188
Population 221
Population 249
Population 281
Population 306
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 13,789
Population Served 16,812
Population Served 9,306
Population Served 19,120
Population Served 16,830
Population Served 14,112
Population Served 13,300
Population Served 17,818
Population Served 16,802
Population Served 22,748
Population Served 7,818
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 13,789
Population Served 16,812
Population Served 9,306
Population Served 19,120
Population Served 16,830
Population Served 14,112
Population Served 13,300
Population Served 17,818
Population Served 16,802
Population Served 22,748
Population Served 7,818
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 48
Functional Sources 38
Functional Sources 29
Functional Sources 54
Functional Sources 43
Functional Sources 42
Functional Sources 37
Functional Sources 48
Functional Sources 41
Functional Sources 62
Functional Sources 19
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | KIOGA | ||||||||
| 1 Namasale TC | Urban | 13,783 | 7,818 | 57% | - | 76% | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Aputi | Rural | 20,126 | 19,120 | 95% | 81% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53 | 10 | 63 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Arwotcek | Rural | 22,321 | 16,830 | 75% | 62% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 | 42 | 8 | 50 | - | 5 | 5 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Agikdak | Rural | 14,515 | 13,789 | 95% | 93% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 4 | 52 | - | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Akwon | Rural | 10,368 | 9,306 | 90% | 84% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | 2 | 31 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Amolatar TC | Urban | 15,003 | 14,112 | 94% | - | 94% | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 41 | 1 | 42 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 5 | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Awelo | Rural | 15,369 | 13,300 | 87% | 87% | - | 100% | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 36 | 4 | 40 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Etam | Rural | 19,638 | 17,818 | 91% | 78% | - | 33% | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | 47 | 10 | 57 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Muntu | Rural | 17,686 | 16,802 | 95% | 70% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 16 | 56 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 | 4 | 1 | No |
| 10 Agwingiri | Rural | 21,223 | 16,812 | 79% | 79% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 38 | 12 | 50 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Namasale | Rural | 27,078 | 22,748 | 84% | 76% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 60 | 12 | 72 | 1 | 7 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 197,110 | 168,456 | 85 | 78 | 88 | 36 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 471 | 85 | 556 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 4 | 1 | No | |
| District | 197,110 | 168,456 | 85 | 78 | 88 | 36 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 471 | 85 | 556 | 7 | 28 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 4 | 1 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee