Madi Okollo District
by July 26, 2024
The access rates in Madi Okollo vary from 27 % in EWANGA Sub-County to 95 % in Uleppi Sub-County. Madi Okollo has 466 domestic water points which serve a total of 122,522 people – 98,788 in rural areas. 129 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned.
Access
62%
Rural Functionality
72%
Equity
192
Management
99%
Gender
98%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 114
Population 0
Population 101
Population 0
Population 86
Population 139
Population 100
Population 99
Population 43
Population 39
Population 0
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 11,418
Population Served 7,015
Population Served 3,300
Population Served 5,300
Population Served 8,145
Population Served 16,984
Population Served 8,906
Population Served 15,168
Population Served 5,406
Population Served 13,518
Population Served 16,898
Population Served 10,464
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 11,418
Population Served 7,015
Population Served 3,300
Population Served 5,300
Population Served 8,145
Population Served 16,984
Population Served 8,906
Population Served 15,168
Population Served 5,406
Population Served 13,518
Population Served 16,898
Population Served 10,464
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 30
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 10
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 26
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 26
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 15
Functional Sources 28
Functional Sources 43
Functional Sources 35
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | MADI-OKOLLO | ||||||||
| 1 Okollo | Rural | 18,280 | 15,168 | 83% | 79% | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 7 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 9 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 OKOLLO T.C | Urban | 8,203 | 7,015 | 86% | - | 59% | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Rhino Camp | Rural | 22,030 | 13,518 | 61% | 58% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Ogoko | Rural | 18,983 | 8,906 | 47% | 84% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | - | 3 | 23 | 3 | 26 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 INDE T.C | Urban | 8,789 | 5,300 | 60% | - | 89% | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 16 | 1 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 RHINO CAMP T.C | Urban | 13,007 | 11,418 | 88% | - | 73% | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 9 | 35 | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Anyiribu | Rural | 9,960 | 8,145 | 82% | 74% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | 8 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Pawor | Rural | 12,304 | 5,406 | 44% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 16 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Rigbo | Rural | 38,318 | 16,898 | 44% | 66% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 38 | 17 | 55 | 3 | 5 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Offaka | Rural | 24,257 | 16,984 | 70% | 64% | - | - | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | 38 | 14 | 52 | 3 | 11 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 EWANGA | Rural | 12,187 | 3,300 | 27% | 91% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Uleppi | Rural | 11,015 | 10,464 | 95% | 88% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 30 | 3 | 33 | 3 | 2 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 197,333 | 122,522 | 62 | 72 | 72 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 278 | 94 | 372 | 23 | 26 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 197,333 | 122,522 | 62 | 72 | 72 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 278 | 94 | 372 | 23 | 26 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections