Madi Okollo District
by May 14, 2025
The access rates in Madi Okollo vary from 31 % in EWANGA Sub-County to 95 % in RHINO CAMP T.C Sub-County. Madi Okollo has 492 domestic water points which serve a total of 127,030 people – 102,151 in rural areas. 129 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned.
Access
63%
Rural Functionality
73%
Equity
173
Management
98%
Gender
98%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 116
Population 0
Population 103
Population 0
Population 44
Population 40
Population 0
Population 88
Population 141
Population 102
Population 101
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 3,900
Population Served 12,564
Population Served 7,015
Population Served 5,300
Population Served 8,445
Population Served 17,284
Population Served 9,206
Population Served 15,168
Population Served 5,406
Population Served 15,018
Population Served 17,198
Population Served 10,527
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 3,900
Population Served 12,564
Population Served 7,015
Population Served 5,300
Population Served 8,445
Population Served 17,284
Population Served 9,206
Population Served 15,168
Population Served 5,406
Population Served 15,018
Population Served 17,198
Population Served 10,527
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 12
Functional Sources 45
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 27
Functional Sources 47
Functional Sources 27
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 15
Functional Sources 33
Functional Sources 44
Functional Sources 35
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | MADI-OKOLLO | ||||||||
| 1 Okollo | Rural | 18,586 | 15,168 | 82% | 79% | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 7 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 9 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 OKOLLO T.C | Urban | 8,340 | 7,015 | 84% | - | 59% | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 RHINO CAMP T.C | Urban | 13,225 | 12,564 | 95% | - | 80% | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 9 | 44 | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Pawor | Rural | 12,510 | 5,406 | 43% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 16 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Rigbo | Rural | 38,960 | 17,198 | 44% | 67% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 39 | 17 | 56 | 3 | 5 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 EWANGA | Rural | 12,391 | 3,900 | 31% | 92% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Uleppi | Rural | 11,199 | 10,527 | 94% | 88% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 30 | 3 | 33 | 3 | 2 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Rhino Camp | Rural | 22,399 | 15,018 | 67% | 62% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 31 | 18 | 49 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Ogoko | Rural | 19,301 | 9,206 | 48% | 84% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | - | 3 | 24 | 3 | 27 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 INDE T.C | Urban | 8,936 | 5,300 | 59% | - | 89% | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 16 | 1 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Anyiribu | Rural | 10,127 | 8,445 | 83% | 75% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | 8 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Offaka | Rural | 24,663 | 17,284 | 70% | 64% | - | - | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | 39 | 14 | 53 | 3 | 11 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 200,637 | 127,030 | 63 | 73 | 76 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 298 | 94 | 392 | 23 | 26 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 200,637 | 127,030 | 63 | 73 | 76 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 298 | 94 | 392 | 23 | 26 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections