Alebtong District
by November 20, 2024
The access rates in Alebtong vary from 40 % in Angetta Sub-County to 95 % in Abako Sub-County. Alebtong has 1,058 domestic water points which serve a total of 225,222 people – 218,922 in rural areas. 296 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Alebtong has 7 piped schemes.
Access
67%
Rural Functionality
73%
Equity
135
Management
88%
Gender
82%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 0
Population 283
Population 179
Population 257
Population 227
Population 203
Population 246
Population 202
Population 113
Population 149
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 7,352
Population Served 14,700
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 6,700
Population Served 3,788
Population Served 24,350
Population Served 29,184
Population Served 27,847
Population Served 17,468
Population Served 25,018
Population Served 18,206
Population Served 5,100
Population Served 15,356
Population Served 28,953
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 7,352
Population Served 14,700
Population Served NWSC
Population Served 6,700
Population Served 3,788
Population Served 24,350
Population Served 29,184
Population Served 27,847
Population Served 17,468
Population Served 25,018
Population Served 18,206
Population Served 5,100
Population Served 15,356
Population Served 28,953
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 25
Functional Sources 36
Functional Sources 3
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 40
Functional Sources 65
Functional Sources 119
Functional Sources 87
Functional Sources 56
Functional Sources 76
Functional Sources 62
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 40
Functional Sources 75
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | MOROTO | ||||||||
| 1 Awei | Rural | 35,996 | 15,356 | 43% | 69% | - | - | 14 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 23 | 4 | 27 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Alebtong TC | Urban | 8,442 | 5,100 | 60% | - | 95% | - | 11 | 1 | 12 | - | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Apala TC | Rural | 7,739 | 7,352 | 95% | 60% | - | - | 7 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Akura | Rural | 29,313 | 27,847 | 95% | 74% | - | - | 22 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 54 | 12 | 66 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Omoro | Rural | 54,521 | 28,953 | 53% | 69% | - | 100% | 25 | 5 | 30 | 24 | 20 | 44 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Apala | Rural | 21,222 | 18,206 | 86% | 84% | - | - | 37 | - | 37 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 24 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Aloi | Rural | 29,195 | 17,468 | 60% | 79% | - | - | 26 | 2 | 28 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 28 | 2 | 30 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Adwir | Rural | 16,767 | 14,700 | 88% | 73% | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | 8 | 28 | 16 | 5 | 21 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Angetta | Rural | 16,767 | 6,700 | 40% | 64% | - | - | 6 | 2 | 8 | - | 7 | 7 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Amugu | Rural | 36,817 | 25,018 | 68% | 76% | - | - | 39 | 2 | 41 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 30 | 8 | 38 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Aloi TC | Urban | 16,181 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 75% | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 12 Abako | Rural | 30,720 | 29,184 | 95% | 73% | - | - | 65 | 10 | 75 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 42 | 8 | 50 | 7 | 5 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Amugu TC | Rural | 3,987 | 3,788 | 95% | 68% | - | - | 19 | 3 | 22 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Abia | Rural | 29,547 | 24,350 | 82% | 76% | - | - | 12 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 49 | 3 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 337,214 | 225,222 | 67 | 73 | 62 | 20 | 297 | 34 | 331 | 83 | 151 | 234 | 364 | 69 | 433 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 337,214 | 225,222 | 67 | 73 | 62 | 20 | 297 | 34 | 331 | 83 | 151 | 234 | 364 | 69 | 433 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee