Mitooma District

by July 26, 2024

The access rates in Mitooma vary from 65 % in Kiyanga Sub-County to 95 % in Bitereko Sub-County. Mitooma has 1,451 domestic water points which serve a total of 186,809 people – 174,758 in rural areas. 235 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Mitooma has 2 piped schemes.

Access

92^%

Rural Functionality

83^%

Equity

36

Management

100^%

Gender

97^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

MTC Mitooma TC 474

BTR Bitereko 435

KNY Kanyabwanga 346

KSH Kashenshero 389

KYN Kiyanga 386

MTM Mitooma 385

MTR Mutara 283

MYN Mayanga 331

RRH Rurehe 436

KTC Kashenshero TC 550

KBR Kabira 401

KTN Katenga 365

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 92 %

Rural Access 91 %

Urban Access 95 %

BTR Bitereko 95 %

KBR Kabira 95 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 95 %

KSH Kashenshero 95 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 95 %

KYN Kiyanga 65 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 95 %

MTR Mutara 95 %

MYN Mayanga 95 %

RRH Rurehe 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 92 %

Rural Access 91 %

Urban Access 95 %

BTR Bitereko 95 %

KBR Kabira 95 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 95 %

KSH Kashenshero 95 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 95 %

KYN Kiyanga 65 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 95 %

MTR Mutara 95 %

MYN Mayanga 95 %

RRH Rurehe 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 83 %

Urban Functionality 90 %

BTR Bitereko 78 %

KBR Kabira 79 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 80 %

KSH Kashenshero 82 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 85 %

KYN Kiyanga 88 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 87 %

MTR Mutara 91 %

MYN Mayanga 91 %

RRH Rurehe 71 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
Ruhinda
1 Kabira	Rural	12,251	11,638	95%	79%	-	-	55	14	69	3	2	5	1	2	3	7	2	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	10	-	-	-	No
2 Kashenshero	Rural	13,444	12,772	95%	82%	-	100%	64	15	79	2	3	5	-	2	2	4	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	1	23	-	23	5	-	-	No
3 Kashenshero TC	Urban	6,397	NWSC	NWSC	-	88%	-	25	4	29	1	1	2	-	1	1	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	17	-	-	-	Yes
4 Bitereko	Rural	30,899	29,354	95%	78%	-	-	86	19	105	22	11	33	1	1	2	8	2	10	-	-	-	-	2	2	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
5 Rurehe	Rural	13,552	12,874	95%	71%	-	-	76	29	105	-	5	5	-	-	-	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
6 Mitooma	Rural	20,491	19,466	95%	87%	-	-	96	15	111	18	2	20	-	-	-	7	2	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	8	-	-	-	No
7 Mutara	Rural	25,695	24,410	95%	91%	-	-	83	12	95	4	5	9	-	-	-	8	1	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	77	-	77	-	-	-	No
8 Kiyanga	Rural	22,334	14,495	65%	88%	-	100%	19	3	22	15	5	20	-	-	-	7	1	8	1	-	1	-	-	-	27	-	27	-	-	-	No
9 Katenga	Rural	19,515	18,539	95%	85%	-	-	74	24	98	4	-	4	1	1	2	8	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	50	-	50	20	5	9	No
10 Mayanga	Rural	12,468	11,845	95%	91%	-	-	94	9	103	6	2	8	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
11 Kanyabwanga	Rural	20,383	19,364	95%	80%	-	-	64	21	85	7	8	15	5	5	10	11	-	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	54	1	55	24	6	1	No
12 Mitooma TC	Urban	6,288	NWSC	NWSC	-	92%	-	26	2	28	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	2	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	15	-	-	-	Yes
Total		203,717	186,809	92	83	90	50	762	167	929	82	44	126	8	12	20	74	11	85	1	0	1	1	2	3	290	1	291	49	11	10	No
District		203,717	186,809	92	83	90	50	762	167	929	82	44	126	8	12	20	74	11	85	1	0	1	1	2	3	290	1	291	49	11	10	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
Unknown/Not GFS	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Surface Water Based/GFS	7	6	0	1	0	3	0	1	0	7	0
Total	12	9	0	1	0	3	0	3	0	9	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

92%

83%

36

100%

97%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

92^%

83^%

100^%

97^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population