Mitooma District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Mitooma vary from 65 % in Kiyanga Sub-County to 95 % in Bitereko Sub-County. Mitooma has 1,449 domestic water points which serve a total of 185,004 people – 173,066 in rural areas. 242 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Mitooma has 2 piped schemes.

Access

92^%

Rural Functionality

83^%

Equity

36

Management

92^%

Gender

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

MTC Mitooma TC 470

BTR Bitereko 431

KNY Kanyabwanga 343

KSH Kashenshero 385

KYN Kiyanga 382

MTM Mitooma 382

MTR Mutara 281

MYN Mayanga 328

RRH Rurehe 432

KTC Kashenshero TC 545

KBR Kabira 397

KTN Katenga 362

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 92 %

Rural Access 91 %

Urban Access 95 %

BTR Bitereko 95 %

KBR Kabira 95 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 95 %

KSH Kashenshero 95 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 95 %

KYN Kiyanga 65 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 95 %

MTR Mutara 95 %

MYN Mayanga 95 %

RRH Rurehe 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 92 %

Rural Access 91 %

Urban Access 95 %

BTR Bitereko 95 %

KBR Kabira 95 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 95 %

KSH Kashenshero 95 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 95 %

KYN Kiyanga 65 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 95 %

MTR Mutara 95 %

MYN Mayanga 95 %

RRH Rurehe 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 83 %

Urban Functionality 83 %

BTR Bitereko 91 %

KBR Kabira 94 %

KNY Kanyabwanga 90 %

KSH Kashenshero 82 %

KTC Kashenshero TC NWSC

KTN Katenga 93 %

KYN Kiyanga 96 %

MTC Mitooma TC NWSC

MTM Mitooma 91 %

MTR Mutara 92 %

MYN Mayanga 92 %

RRH Rurehe 98 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
Ruhinda
1 Kabira	Rural	12,137	11,530	95%	74%	-	-	65	4	69	5	-	5	1	2	3	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	10	-	-	-	No
2 Kashenshero	Rural	13,319	12,653	95%	89%	-	100%	63	16	79	2	3	5	1	1	2	4	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	1	23	-	23	5	-	-	No
3 Kashenshero TC	Urban	6,337	NWSC	NWSC	-	78%	-	27	2	29	2	-	2	-	1	1	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	17	-	-	-	Yes
4 Bitereko	Rural	30,611	29,080	95%	74%	-	50%	92	12	104	32	1	33	1	1	2	10	-	10	-	-	-	2	-	2	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
5 Rurehe	Rural	13,426	12,755	95%	74%	-	-	103	2	105	5	-	5	-	-	-	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	No
6 Mitooma	Rural	20,300	19,285	95%	89%	-	-	98	13	111	20	-	20	-	-	-	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	8	-	-	-	No
7 Mutara	Rural	25,456	24,183	95%	90%	-	-	83	12	95	8	1	9	-	-	-	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	62	2	64	-	-	-	No
8 Kiyanga	Rural	22,126	14,295	65%	97%	-	100%	21	1	22	19	1	20	-	-	-	6	-	6	1	-	1	-	-	-	26	1	27	-	-	-	No
9 Katenga	Rural	19,333	18,366	95%	95%	-	-	87	11	98	4	-	4	2	-	2	8	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	50	-	50	20	5	9	No
10 Mayanga	Rural	12,352	11,734	95%	67%	-	-	94	9	103	8	-	8	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
11 Kanyabwanga	Rural	20,193	19,183	95%	81%	-	-	76	9	85	14	1	15	4	6	10	11	-	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	54	1	55	24	6	1	No
12 Mitooma TC	Urban	6,230	NWSC	NWSC	-	88%	-	24	4	28	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	15	-	-	-	Yes
Total		201,820	185,004	92	83	83	75	736	191	927	113	13	126	3	17	20	76	9	85	1	0	1	2	1	3	279	12	291	49	11	10	No
District		201,820	185,004	92	83	83	75	736	191	927	113	13	126	3	17	20	76	9	85	1	0	1	2	1	3	279	12	291	49	11	10	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	2	0
Unknown/Not GFS	3	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Surface Water Based/GFS	7	6	0	1	0	3	0	1	0	7	0
Total	12	9	0	1	0	3	0	3	0	9	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

92%

83%

36

92%

93%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

92^%

83^%

92^%

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population