Mayuge District

by March 30, 2025

The access rates in Mayuge vary from 28 % in Malongo Sub-County to 95 % in Busakira Sub-County. Mayuge has 1,410 domestic water points which serve a total of 365,304 people – 345,204 in rural areas. 157 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Mayuge has 1 piped schemes.

Access

57^%

Rural Functionality

88^%

Equity

137

Management

99^%

Gender

86^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

IMN Imanyiro 492

JGZ Jaguzi 733

MGT Magamaga TC Unknown

MTC Mayuge TC 1,436

MLN Malongo 629

KTY Kityerera 669

KGN Kigandalo 427

BWY Buwaaya 522

BTM Baitambogwe 649

BKT Bukatube 355

BKB Bukabooli 757

BSK Busakira 642

MPN Mpungwe 609

WRS Wairasa 422

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 57 %

Rural Access 58 %

Urban Access 44 %

BKB Bukabooli 48 %

BKT Bukatube 58 %

BSK Busakira 95 %

BTM Baitambogwe 74 %

BWY Buwaaya 82 %

IMN Imanyiro 79 %

JGZ Jaguzi 58 %

KGN Kigandalo 93 %

KTY Kityerera 54 %

MGT Magamaga TC 40 %

MLN Malongo 28 %

MPN Mpungwe 56 %

MTC Mayuge TC NWSC

WRS Wairasa 43 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 57 %

Rural Access 58 %

Urban Access 44 %

BKB Bukabooli 48 %

BKT Bukatube 58 %

BSK Busakira 95 %

BTM Baitambogwe 74 %

BWY Buwaaya 82 %

IMN Imanyiro 79 %

JGZ Jaguzi 58 %

KGN Kigandalo 93 %

KTY Kityerera 54 %

MGT Magamaga TC 40 %

MLN Malongo 28 %

MPN Mpungwe 56 %

MTC Mayuge TC NWSC

WRS Wairasa 43 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 88 %

Urban Functionality 96 %

BKB Bukabooli 86 %

BKT Bukatube 93 %

BSK Busakira 84 %

BTM Baitambogwe 95 %

BWY Buwaaya 92 %

IMN Imanyiro 85 %

JGZ Jaguzi 83 %

KGN Kigandalo 83 %

KTY Kityerera 96 %

MGT Magamaga TC 94 %

MLN Malongo 92 %

MPN Mpungwe 76 %

MTC Mayuge TC NWSC

WRS Wairasa 96 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
BUNYA
1 Kigandalo	Rural	42,776	39,700	93%	83%	-	-	24	11	35	47	13	60	49	-	49	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-	No
2 Mayuge TC	Urban	23,639	NWSC	NWSC	-	98%	-	19	-	19	6	1	7	18	-	18	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
3 Imanyiro	Rural	42,526	33,400	79%	85%	-	-	43	10	53	20	6	26	47	3	50	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Baitambogwe	Rural	51,532	38,200	74%	95%	-	-	47	6	53	27	-	27	64	1	65	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Magamaga TC	Urban	22,139	8,800	40%	-	94%	-	11	-	11	2	2	4	18	-	18	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Jaguzi	Rural	18,011	10,500	58%	83%	-	-	-	-	-	28	6	34	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Wairasa	Rural	24,265	10,350	43%	96%	-	-	1	2	3	1	-	1	22	-	22	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	19	10	-	3	No
8 Buwaaya	Rural	28,893	23,624	82%	92%	-	-	16	3	19	31	-	31	35	-	35	-	4	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
9 Bukabooli	Rural	58,786	28,106	48%	86%	-	-	3	4	7	14	10	24	58	-	58	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	14	14	-	-	No
10 Kityerera	Rural	62,663	33,862	54%	96%	-	-	2	-	2	2	3	5	105	1	106	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
11 Bukatube	Rural	54,408	31,412	58%	93%	-	-	6	4	10	40	2	42	50	-	50	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	12	9	-	-	No
12 Busakira	Rural	39,524	37,548	95%	84%	-	-	7	13	20	43	17	60	109	1	110	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
13 Mpungwe	Rural	34,771	19,503	56%	76%	-	-	20	7	27	10	9	19	27	1	28	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
14 Malongo	Rural	138,585	39,000	28%	92%	-	-	18	3	21	16	2	18	91	-	91	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	7	14	14	-	-	No
Total		642,518	365,304	57	88	96	0	217	63	280	287	71	358	694	7	701	3	8	11	0	0	0	0	0	0	52	8	60	53	0	3	No
District		642,518	365,304	57	88	96	0	217	63	280	287	71	358	694	7	701	3	8	11	0	0	0	0	0	0	52	8	60	53	0	3	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Unknown/Not GFS	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Surface Water Based/Unknown	12	12	0	0	0	11	0	1	0	5	6
Total	13	12	0	0	0	11	0	2	0	5	6

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

57%

88%

137

99%

86%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

57^%

88^%

99^%

86^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population