Zombo District

by November 20, 2024

The access rates in Zombo vary from 59 % in Athuma Sub-County to 95 % in Jangokoro Sub-County. Zombo has 1,481 domestic water points which serve a total of 275,122 people – 228,989 in rural areas. 308 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Zombo has 8 piped schemes.

Access

87^%

Rural Functionality

79^%

Equity

41

Management

73^%

Gender

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

AKA Akaa Unknown

ALG Alangi Unknown

ATM Athuma Unknown

PTC Paidha TC 2,123

NYP Nyapea 312

PDH Paidha 245

ABN Abanga 561

WRR Warr 387

ATY Atyak 193

JNG Jangokoro 139

KNG Kango 122

ZEU Zeu 179

ZTC Zombo TC 477

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 87 %

Rural Access 89 %

Urban Access 80 %

ABN Abanga 95 %

AKA Akaa 95 %

ALG Alangi 91 %

ATM Athuma 59 %

ATY Atyak 88 %

JNG Jangokoro 95 %

KNG Kango 95 %

NYP Nyapea 95 %

PDH Paidha 95 %

PTC Paidha TC NWSC

WRR Warr 95 %

ZEU Zeu 82 %

ZTC Zombo TC 87 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 87 %

Rural Access 89 %

Urban Access 80 %

ABN Abanga 95 %

AKA Akaa 95 %

ALG Alangi 91 %

ATM Athuma 59 %

ATY Atyak 88 %

JNG Jangokoro 95 %

KNG Kango 95 %

NYP Nyapea 95 %

PDH Paidha 95 %

PTC Paidha TC NWSC

WRR Warr 95 %

ZEU Zeu 82 %

ZTC Zombo TC 87 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 79 %

Urban Functionality 78 %

ABN Abanga 74 %

AKA Akaa 84 %

ALG Alangi 87 %

ATM Athuma 82 %

ATY Atyak 80 %

JNG Jangokoro 87 %

KNG Kango 88 %

NYP Nyapea 79 %

PDH Paidha 69 %

PTC Paidha TC NWSC

WRR Warr 71 %

ZEU Zeu 79 %

ZTC Zombo TC 57 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
OKORO
1 Jangokoro	Rural	15,937	15,140	95%	87%	-	-	59	6	65	1	1	2	6	2	8	4	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	2	4	-	-	-	No
2 Paidha	Rural	19,952	18,954	95%	69%	-	-	55	21	76	4	2	6	12	9	21	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Paidha TC	Urban	41,729	NWSC	NWSC	-	88%	-	107	2	109	1	1	2	15	12	27	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	4	12	-	-	-	Yes
4 Atyak	Rural	29,076	25,627	88%	80%	-	-	78	20	98	2	1	3	15	2	17	4	2	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Kango	Rural	18,005	17,105	95%	88%	-	-	81	1	82	2	3	5	3	6	9	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	1	3	-	-	-	No
6 Athuma	Rural	24,940	14,606	59%	82%	-	-	36	4	40	1	3	4	12	4	16	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	4	-	-	-	No
7 Zeu	Rural	27,860	22,830	82%	79%	-	-	64	11	75	-	1	1	15	10	25	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Warr	Rural	24,697	23,462	95%	71%	-	100%	74	25	99	3	1	4	18	5	23	3	4	7	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	6	6	-	-	-	No
9 Alangi	Rural	27,860	25,386	91%	87%	-	-	79	11	90	2	-	2	15	3	18	4	2	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	9	-	-	-	No
10 Zombo TC	Urban	15,816	13,821	87%	-	57%	-	32	28	60	-	1	1	4	1	5	4	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Nyapea	Rural	27,738	26,351	95%	79%	-	-	96	22	118	-	5	5	12	4	16	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	47	11	58	-	-	-	No
12 Akaa	Rural	18,492	17,567	95%	84%	-	-	30	5	35	-	1	1	15	2	17	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	36	6	42	-	-	-	No
13 Abanga	Rural	23,115	21,959	95%	74%	-	-	71	17	88	1	2	3	4	4	8	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	5	9	-	-	-	No
Total		315,217	275,122	87	79	78	100	862	173	1,035	17	22	39	146	64	210	36	14	50	1	0	1	0	0	0	112	35	147	0	0	0	No
District		315,217	275,122	87	79	78	100	862	173	1,035	17	22	39	146	64	210	36	14	50	1	0	1	0	0	0	112	35	147	0	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/GFS	8	5	1	2	0	7	0	1	0	1	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	3	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	0
Unknown/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	13	8	2	3	0	7	0	1	1	3	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

87%

79%

41

73%

93%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

87^%

79^%

73^%

93^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population