Tororo District
by July 26, 2024
The access rates in Tororo vary from 22 % in AKADOT Sub-County to 91 % in Magola Sub-County. Tororo has 1,285 domestic water points which serve a total of 393,171 people – 318,394 in rural areas. 21 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Tororo has 1 piped schemes.
Access
59%
Rural Functionality
98%
Equity
114
Management
79%
Gender
87%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
NGN
Nagongera
571
NagongeraPopulation 571
WDV
Western DIV
2,161
Western DIVPopulation 2,161
EDV
Eastern DIV
1,377
Eastern DIVPopulation 1,377
IYOLWA T.C
Unknown
IYOLWA T.CPopulation 0
OJILAI
Unknown
OJILAI Population 0
AKADOT
Unknown
AKADOT Population 0
APETAI
Unknown
APETAI Population 0
MTC
Malaba TC
1,512
Malaba TCPopulation 1,512
KWP
Kwapa
591
KwapaPopulation 591
MLL
Mella
481
MellaPopulation 481
MRK
Merikit
583
MerikitPopulation 583
MLO
Molo
569
MoloPopulation 569
MKJ
Mukuju
234
MukujuPopulation 234
OSK
Osukuru
497
OsukuruPopulation 497
MWELLO
Unknown
MWELLO Population 0
IYL
Iyolwa
78
IyolwaPopulation 78
KRW
Kirewa
562
KirewaPopulation 562
KSK
Kisoko
646
KisokoPopulation 646
MGL
Magola
378
MagolaPopulation 378
MLN
Mulanda
177
MulandaPopulation 177
NBY
Nabuyoga
425
NabuyogaPopulation 425
NTC
Nagongera TC
618
Nagongera TCPopulation 618
PYA
Paya
459
PayaPopulation 459
PTT
Petta
558
PettaPopulation 558
RBN
Rubongi
568
RubongiPopulation 568
SOP
Sop-Sop
478
Sop-SopPopulation 478
PAJWENDA T.C
Unknown
PAJWENDA T.CPopulation 0
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
59 %
Rural Access
59 %
Urban Access
61 %
APETAI
71 %
APETAI Population Served 12,206
MWELLO
52 %
MWELLO Population Served 9,109
IYOLWA T.C
NWSC
IYOLWA T.CPopulation Served NWSC
OJILAI
50 %
OJILAI Population Served 4,300
AKADOT
22 %
AKADOT Population Served 4,415
EDV
Eastern DIV
NWSC
Eastern DIVPopulation Served NWSC
IYL
Iyolwa
52 %
IyolwaPopulation Served 3,500
KRW
Kirewa
47 %
KirewaPopulation Served 16,456
KSK
Kisoko
85 %
KisokoPopulation Served 20,012
KWP
Kwapa
67 %
KwapaPopulation Served 16,927
MGL
Magola
91 %
MagolaPopulation Served 20,262
MKJ
Mukuju
58 %
MukujuPopulation Served 10,539
MLL
Mella
NWSC
MellaPopulation Served NWSC
MLN
Mulanda
48 %
MulandaPopulation Served 9,212
MLO
Molo
71 %
MoloPopulation Served 16,639
MRK
Merikit
41 %
MerikitPopulation Served 13,215
MTC
Malaba TC
NWSC
Malaba TCPopulation Served NWSC
NBY
Nabuyoga
50 %
NabuyogaPopulation Served 19,415
NGN
Nagongera
52 %
NagongeraPopulation Served 16,412
NTC
Nagongera TC
41 %
Nagongera TCPopulation Served 6,324
OSK
Osukuru
59 %
OsukuruPopulation Served 33,654
PTT
Petta
69 %
PettaPopulation Served 13,618
PYA
Paya
68 %
PayaPopulation Served 25,002
RBN
Rubongi
65 %
RubongiPopulation Served 29,400
SOP
Sop-Sop
59 %
Sop-SopPopulation Served 10,500
WDV
Western DIV
NWSC
Western DIVPopulation Served NWSC
PAJWENDA T.C
33 %
PAJWENDA T.CPopulation Served 5,506
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
59 %
Rural Access
59 %
Urban Access
61 %
APETAI
71 %
APETAI Population Served 12,206
MWELLO
52 %
MWELLO Population Served 9,109
IYOLWA T.C
NWSC
IYOLWA T.CPopulation Served NWSC
OJILAI
50 %
OJILAI Population Served 4,300
AKADOT
22 %
AKADOT Population Served 4,415
EDV
Eastern DIV
NWSC
Eastern DIVPopulation Served NWSC
IYL
Iyolwa
52 %
IyolwaPopulation Served 3,500
KRW
Kirewa
47 %
KirewaPopulation Served 16,456
KSK
Kisoko
85 %
KisokoPopulation Served 20,012
KWP
Kwapa
67 %
KwapaPopulation Served 16,927
MGL
Magola
91 %
MagolaPopulation Served 20,262
MKJ
Mukuju
58 %
MukujuPopulation Served 10,539
MLL
Mella
NWSC
MellaPopulation Served NWSC
MLN
Mulanda
48 %
MulandaPopulation Served 9,212
MLO
Molo
71 %
MoloPopulation Served 16,639
MRK
Merikit
41 %
MerikitPopulation Served 13,215
MTC
Malaba TC
NWSC
Malaba TCPopulation Served NWSC
NBY
Nabuyoga
50 %
NabuyogaPopulation Served 19,415
NGN
Nagongera
52 %
NagongeraPopulation Served 16,412
NTC
Nagongera TC
41 %
Nagongera TCPopulation Served 6,324
OSK
Osukuru
59 %
OsukuruPopulation Served 33,654
PTT
Petta
69 %
PettaPopulation Served 13,618
PYA
Paya
68 %
PayaPopulation Served 25,002
RBN
Rubongi
65 %
RubongiPopulation Served 29,400
SOP
Sop-Sop
59 %
Sop-SopPopulation Served 10,500
WDV
Western DIV
NWSC
Western DIVPopulation Served NWSC
PAJWENDA T.C
33 %
PAJWENDA T.CPopulation Served 5,506
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
98 %
Urban Functionality
98 %
APETAI
98 %
APETAI Functional Sources 43
MWELLO
97 %
MWELLO Functional Sources 32
IYOLWA T.C
NWSC
IYOLWA T.CFunctional Sources 38
OJILAI
100 %
OJILAI Functional Sources 15
AKADOT
100 %
AKADOT Functional Sources 18
EDV
Eastern DIV
NWSC
Eastern DIVFunctional Sources 2
IYL
Iyolwa
100 %
IyolwaFunctional Sources 13
KRW
Kirewa
96 %
KirewaFunctional Sources 55
KSK
Kisoko
100 %
KisokoFunctional Sources 70
KWP
Kwapa
99 %
KwapaFunctional Sources 68
MGL
Magola
100 %
MagolaFunctional Sources 73
MKJ
Mukuju
96 %
MukujuFunctional Sources 44
MLL
Mella
NWSC
MellaFunctional Sources 49
MLN
Mulanda
88 %
MulandaFunctional Sources 30
MLO
Molo
98 %
MoloFunctional Sources 64
MRK
Merikit
96 %
MerikitFunctional Sources 46
MTC
Malaba TC
NWSC
Malaba TCFunctional Sources 10
NBY
Nabuyoga
99 %
NabuyogaFunctional Sources 70
NGN
Nagongera
100 %
NagongeraFunctional Sources 59
NTC
Nagongera TC
100 %
Nagongera TCFunctional Sources 26
OSK
Osukuru
97 %
OsukuruFunctional Sources 140
PTT
Petta
100 %
PettaFunctional Sources 50
PYA
Paya
100 %
PayaFunctional Sources 77
RBN
Rubongi
100 %
RubongiFunctional Sources 112
SOP
Sop-Sop
100 %
Sop-SopFunctional Sources 35
WDV
Western DIV
NWSC
Western DIVFunctional Sources 4
PAJWENDA T.C
100 %
PAJWENDA T.CFunctional Sources 21
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | WEST BUDAMA (KISOLO) | ||||||||
| 1 Rubongi | Rural | 45,581 | 29,400 | 65% | 100% | - | - | 42 | - | 42 | 1 | - | 1 | 69 | - | 69 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Iyolwa | Rural | 6,761 | 3,500 | 52% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 1 | - | 1 | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Kirewa | Rural | 35,089 | 16,456 | 47% | 96% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 50 | 2 | 52 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Magola | Rural | 22,266 | 20,262 | 91% | 100% | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | 5 | - | 5 | 56 | - | 56 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Paya | Rural | 36,838 | 25,002 | 68% | 100% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 8 | - | 8 | 60 | - | 60 | 6 | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 273 | 11 | 39 | No |
| 6 OJILAI | Rural | 8,627 | 4,300 | 50% | 100% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | 11 | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Nagongera TC | Urban | 15,388 | 6,324 | 41% | - | 100% | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 19 | - | 19 | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kisoko | Rural | 23,665 | 20,012 | 85% | 100% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | 64 | - | 64 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 IYOLWA T.C | Urban | 13,989 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 95% | - | 8 | - | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 1 | 26 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 10 Mulanda | Rural | 19,351 | 9,212 | 48% | 88% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 1 | - | 1 | 23 | 4 | 27 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 MWELLO | Rural | 17,603 | 9,109 | 52% | 97% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 27 | 1 | 28 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Petta | Rural | 19,701 | 13,618 | 69% | 100% | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | 42 | - | 42 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 13 PAJWENDA T.C | Urban | 16,815 | 5,506 | 33% | - | 100% | - | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | 15 | - | 15 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Sop-Sop | Rural | 17,836 | 10,500 | 59% | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | - | 8 | 27 | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 15 Nabuyoga | Rural | 38,586 | 19,415 | 50% | 99% | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 3 | - | 3 | 54 | 1 | 55 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 16 Nagongera | Rural | 31,708 | 16,412 | 52% | 100% | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | 1 | - | 1 | 49 | - | 49 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 369,804 | 219,347 | 59 | 99 | 98 | 0 | 110 | 0 | 110 | 34 | 1 | 35 | 599 | 9 | 608 | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 273 | 11 | 39 | No | TORORO |
| 1 Malaba TC | Urban | 22,382 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 Mukuju | Rural | 18,302 | 10,539 | 58% | 96% | - | - | 11 | 1 | 12 | - | - | - | 26 | 1 | 27 | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 AKADOT | Rural | 19,701 | 4,415 | 22% | 100% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 14 | - | 14 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mella | Rural | 24,014 | NWSC | NWSC | 100% | - | - | 11 | - | 11 | 1 | - | 1 | 37 | - | 37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 5 APETAI | Rural | 17,253 | 12,206 | 71% | 98% | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | 35 | 1 | 36 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Molo | Rural | 23,431 | 16,639 | 71% | 98% | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 2 | - | 2 | 49 | 1 | 50 | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kwapa | Rural | 25,180 | 16,927 | 67% | 99% | - | 100% | 23 | - | 23 | 2 | - | 2 | 38 | 1 | 39 | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Merikit | Rural | 32,175 | 13,215 | 41% | 96% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | 40 | 2 | 42 | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Osukuru | Rural | 57,005 | 33,654 | 59% | 97% | - | - | 63 | - | 63 | 2 | - | 2 | 63 | 4 | 67 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 239,443 | 124,194 | 52 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 124 | 1 | 125 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 312 | 10 | 322 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | TORORO M.C |
| 1 Eastern DIV | Urban | 24,340 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 2 Western DIV | Urban | 29,231 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| Total | 53,571 | 49,630 | 93 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 662,818 | 393,171 | 59 | 98 | 98 | 100 | 234 | 1 | 235 | 41 | 1 | 42 | 917 | 19 | 936 | 68 | 0 | 68 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 273 | 11 | 39 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee