Tororo District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Tororo vary from 33 % in Nagongera TC Sub-County to 79 % in Magola Sub-County. Tororo has 1,216 domestic water points which serve a total of 375,155 people – 317,701 in rural areas. 141 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Tororo has 1 piped schemes.

Access

58^%

Rural Functionality

88^%

Equity

94

Management

83^%

Gender

88^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

NGN Nagongera 573

IYL Iyolwa 291

KRW Kirewa 564

KSK Kisoko 648

MLN Mulanda 444

NBY Nabuyoga 427

PYA Paya 461

PTT Petta 560

RBN Rubongi 570

KWP Kwapa 593

MLL Mella 482

MRK Merikit 585

MLO Molo 571

MKJ Mukuju 609

OSK Osukuru 499

WDV Western DIV 2,119

EDV Eastern DIV 1,350

MGL Magola 380

NTC Nagongera TC 621

SOP Sop-Sop 480

MTC Malaba TC 1,518

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 58 %

Rural Access 57 %

Urban Access 64 %

EDV Eastern DIV NWSC

IYL Iyolwa 71 %

KRW Kirewa 42 %

KSK Kisoko 73 %

KWP Kwapa 66 %

MGL Magola 79 %

MKJ Mukuju 56 %

MLL Mella NWSC

MLN Mulanda 49 %

MLO Molo 67 %

MRK Merikit 40 %

MTC Malaba TC NWSC

NBY Nabuyoga 50 %

NGN Nagongera 45 %

NTC Nagongera TC 33 %

OSK Osukuru 58 %

PTT Petta 66 %

PYA Paya 61 %

RBN Rubongi 62 %

SOP Sop-Sop 54 %

WDV Western DIV NWSC

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 58 %

Rural Access 57 %

Urban Access 64 %

EDV Eastern DIV NWSC

IYL Iyolwa 71 %

KRW Kirewa 42 %

KSK Kisoko 73 %

KWP Kwapa 66 %

MGL Magola 79 %

MKJ Mukuju 56 %

MLL Mella NWSC

MLN Mulanda 49 %

MLO Molo 67 %

MRK Merikit 40 %

MTC Malaba TC NWSC

NBY Nabuyoga 50 %

NGN Nagongera 45 %

NTC Nagongera TC 33 %

OSK Osukuru 58 %

PTT Petta 66 %

PYA Paya 61 %

RBN Rubongi 62 %

SOP Sop-Sop 54 %

WDV Western DIV NWSC

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 88 %

Urban Functionality 100 %

EDV Eastern DIV NWSC

IYL Iyolwa 98 %

KRW Kirewa 76 %

KSK Kisoko 81 %

KWP Kwapa 97 %

MGL Magola 95 %

MKJ Mukuju 95 %

MLL Mella NWSC

MLN Mulanda 81 %

MLO Molo 92 %

MRK Merikit 91 %

MTC Malaba TC NWSC

NBY Nabuyoga 95 %

NGN Nagongera 64 %

NTC Nagongera TC 100 %

OSK Osukuru 88 %

PTT Petta 60 %

PYA Paya 64 %

RBN Rubongi 100 %

SOP Sop-Sop 87 %

WDV Western DIV NWSC

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
WEST BUDAMA (KISOLO)
1 Rubongi	Rural	45,744	28,500	62%	100%	-	-	42	-	42	1	-	1	57	-	57	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Iyolwa	Rural	25,388	18,112	71%	99%	-	-	14	-	14	6	-	6	43	1	44	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Kirewa	Rural	35,215	14,650	42%	78%	-	-	2	-	2	-	-	-	33	10	43	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
4 Magola	Rural	22,346	17,562	79%	95%	-	-	9	-	9	5	-	5	41	3	44	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	No
5 Paya	Rural	36,970	22,602	61%	74%	-	-	3	-	3	6	2	8	36	20	56	2	4	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	273	11	39	No
6 Nagongera TC	Urban	15,443	5,124	33%	-	100%	-	3	-	3	-	-	-	15	-	15	4	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Kisoko	Rural	23,750	17,312	73%	84%	-	-	4	-	4	-	-	-	41	11	52	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Mulanda	Rural	48,435	23,527	49%	82%	-	-	11	-	11	1	1	2	50	15	65	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
9 Petta	Rural	19,772	13,018	66%	63%	-	-	4	1	5	-	-	-	21	16	37	2	1	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Sop-Sop	Rural	17,900	9,600	54%	88%	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	8	18	4	22	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
11 Nabuyoga	Rural	38,725	19,415	50%	96%	-	-	9	1	10	3	-	3	48	2	50	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
12 Nagongera	Rural	31,822	14,312	45%	71%	-	-	5	2	7	-	-	-	21	14	35	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		361,510	203,735	56	86	100	0	106	4	110	30	3	33	472	86	558	24	5	29	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	273	11	39	No
TORORO
1 Malaba TC	Urban	22,463	NWSC	NWSC	-	100%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
2 Mukuju	Rural	47,733	26,854	56%	95%	-	-	20	-	20	-	-	-	67	5	72	10	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Mella	Rural	24,101	NWSC	NWSC	82%	-	-	11	-	11	1	-	1	26	9	35	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
4 Molo	Rural	23,516	15,739	67%	92%	-	-	5	-	5	2	-	2	43	3	46	6	2	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Kwapa	Rural	25,271	16,627	66%	97%	-	100%	23	-	23	2	-	2	35	1	36	4	1	5	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Merikit	Rural	32,290	12,915	40%	91%	-	-	3	-	3	-	-	-	36	4	40	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Osukuru	Rural	57,210	33,354	58%	88%	-	-	62	1	63	2	-	2	53	11	64	5	5	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
Total		232,584	121,790	52	91	100	100	124	1	125	7	0	7	281	33	314	28	8	36	1	0	1	0	0	0	2	0	2	0	0	0	No
TORORO M.C
1 Western DIV	Urban	28,663	NWSC	NWSC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
2 Eastern DIV	Urban	23,867	NWSC	NWSC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
Total		52,530	49,630	94	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	No
District		646,624	375,155	58	88	100	100	230	5	235	37	3	40	753	119	872	52	13	65	1	0	1	0	0	0	3	1	4	273	11	39	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Total	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

58%

88%

94

83%

88%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

58^%

88^%

83^%

88^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population