Pader District

by September 29, 2023

The access rates in Pader vary from 95 % in Acholi Bur Sub-County to 95 % in Acholi Bur Sub-County. Pader has 1,300 domestic water points which serve a total of 200,557 people – 185,494 in rural areas. 252 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Pader has 2 piped schemes.

Access

95^%

Rural Functionality

80^%

Equity

31

Management

92^%

Gender

99^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

LGT Laguti 36

LTN Latanya 84

ANG Angangura 27

ATN Atanga 66

PDR Pader 56

AWR Awere 74

LPL Lapul 62

PRN Puranga 74

ABR Acholi Bur 123

PTC Pader TC 236

OGM Ogom 44

PJL Pajule 70

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 95 %

Rural Access 95 %

Urban Access 95 %

ABR Acholi Bur 95 %

ANG Angangura 95 %

ATN Atanga 95 %

AWR Awere 95 %

LGT Laguti 95 %

LPL Lapul 95 %

LTN Latanya 95 %

OGM Ogom 95 %

PDR Pader 95 %

PJL Pajule 95 %

PRN Puranga 95 %

PTC Pader TC NWSC

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 95 %

Rural Access 95 %

Urban Access 95 %

ABR Acholi Bur 95 %

ANG Angangura 95 %

ATN Atanga 95 %

AWR Awere 95 %

LGT Laguti 95 %

LPL Lapul 95 %

LTN Latanya 95 %

OGM Ogom 95 %

PDR Pader 95 %

PJL Pajule 95 %

PRN Puranga 95 %

PTC Pader TC NWSC

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 80 %

Urban Functionality 92 %

ABR Acholi Bur 72 %

ANG Angangura 78 %

ATN Atanga 82 %

AWR Awere 80 %

LGT Laguti 76 %

LPL Lapul 80 %

LTN Latanya 69 %

OGM Ogom 85 %

PDR Pader 90 %

PJL Pajule 78 %

PRN Puranga 66 %

PTC Pader TC NWSC

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
ARUU
1 Pader	Rural	11,213	10,652	95%	90%	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	62	7	69	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Awere	Rural	23,218	22,057	95%	84%	-	-	7	-	7	6	-	6	53	11	64	-	5	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Pajule	Rural	27,182	25,823	95%	81%	-	-	2	-	2	-	6	6	108	18	126	1	5	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	2	-	-	-	No
4 Ogom	Rural	10,080	9,576	95%	85%	-	-	-	1	1	1	2	3	69	2	71	2	7	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
5 Angangura	Rural	10,646	10,114	95%	82%	-	-	1	-	1	2	-	2	62	17	79	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Pader TC	Urban	15,856	NWSC	NWSC	-	92%	100%	1	-	1	6	1	7	62	8	70	1	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	1	29	-	29	-	-	-	Yes
7 Acholi Bur	Rural	16,649	15,817	95%	73%	-	-	1	-	1	1	1	2	57	18	75	-	4	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Latanya	Rural	17,895	17,000	95%	71%	-	-	-	-	-	1	3	4	94	36	130	-	2	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
9 Lapul	Rural	21,632	20,550	95%	81%	-	100%	-	-	-	2	3	5	81	15	96	3	3	6	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
10 Laguti	Rural	15,969	15,171	95%	83%	-	-	1	-	1	2	-	2	73	17	90	-	4	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	3	4	-	-	-	No
11 Puranga	Rural	22,425	21,304	95%	68%	-	-	9	-	9	6	3	9	64	28	92	4	11	15	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	No
12 Atanga	Rural	18,348	17,431	95%	84%	-	-	-	1	1	2	2	4	86	16	102	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	2	-	-	-	No
Total		211,113	200,557	95	80	92	100	21	4	25	28	22	50	951	178	1,129	13	41	54	1	0	1	1	0	1	35	7	42	0	0	0	No
District		211,113	200,557	95	80	92	100	21	4	25	28	22	50	951	178	1,129	13	41	54	1	0	1	1	0	1	35	7	42	0	0	0	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Surface Water Based/Not GFS	2	0	2	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0
Unknown/Not GFS	10	4	4	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Not GFS	26	11	15	0	1	17	0	1	4	5	0
Total	38	15	21	0	0	19	0	2	4	5	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

95%

80%

31

92%

99%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

95^%

80^%

92^%

99^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population