Pader District
by November 20, 2024
The access rates in Pader vary from 72 % in Bongtiko Sub-County to 95 % in Acholi Bur Sub-County. Pader has 1,352 domestic water points which serve a total of 205,391 people – 170,060 in rural areas. 280 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Pader has 2 piped schemes.
Access
93%
Rural Functionality
78%
Equity
53
Management
96%
Gender
99%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
LGT
Laguti
22
LagutiPopulation 22
LTN
Latanya
85
LatanyaPopulation 85
TN
Tee-nam
Unknown
Tee-namPopulation 0
AJ
Ajan
Unknown
AjanPopulation 0
ATN
Atanga
44
AtangaPopulation 44
AWR
Awere
27
AwerePopulation 27
LPL
Lapul
24
LapulPopulation 24
PDR
Pader
56
PaderPopulation 56
PRN
Puranga
39
PurangaPopulation 39
ABR
Acholi Bur
124
Acholi BurPopulation 124
PTC
Pader TC
236
Pader TCPopulation 236
OGM
Ogom
13
OgomPopulation 13
PJL
Pajule
19
PajulePopulation 19
PAI
Paiula
Unknown
PaiulaPopulation 0
ANG
Angangura
27
AnganguraPopulation 27
PJT
Pajule Town Council
Unknown
Pajule Town CouncilPopulation 0
PUK
Pukor
Unknown
PukorPopulation 0
ATC
Atanga TC
Unknown
Atanga TCPopulation 0
LY
Lunyiri
Unknown
LunyiriPopulation 0
BO
Bongtiko
Unknown
BongtikoPopulation 0
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
93 %
Rural Access
92 %
Urban Access
94 %
ABR
Acholi Bur
95 %
Acholi BurPopulation Served 15,865
AJ
Ajan
95 %
AjanPopulation Served 7,771
ANG
Angangura
95 %
AnganguraPopulation Served 10,145
ATC
Atanga TC
95 %
Atanga TCPopulation Served 7,878
ATN
Atanga
95 %
AtangaPopulation Served 11,657
AWR
Awere
95 %
AwerePopulation Served 8,095
BO
Bongtiko
72 %
BongtikoPopulation Served 11,400
LGT
Laguti
95 %
LagutiPopulation Served 9,174
LPL
Lapul
95 %
LapulPopulation Served 7,878
LTN
Latanya
95 %
LatanyaPopulation Served 17,053
LY
Lunyiri
88 %
LunyiriPopulation Served 15,224
OGM
Ogom
95 %
OgomPopulation Served 2,806
PAI
Paiula
95 %
PaiulaPopulation Served 9,066
PDR
Pader
95 %
PaderPopulation Served 10,685
PJL
Pajule
95 %
PajulePopulation Served 6,907
PJT
Pajule Town Council
NWSC
Pajule Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
PRN
Puranga
95 %
PurangaPopulation Served 11,224
PTC
Pader TC
NWSC
Pader TCPopulation Served NWSC
PUK
Pukor
95 %
PukorPopulation Served 7,987
TN
Tee-nam
95 %
Tee-namPopulation Served 7,123
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
93 %
Rural Access
92 %
Urban Access
94 %
ABR
Acholi Bur
95 %
Acholi BurPopulation Served 15,865
AJ
Ajan
95 %
AjanPopulation Served 7,771
ANG
Angangura
95 %
AnganguraPopulation Served 10,145
ATC
Atanga TC
95 %
Atanga TCPopulation Served 7,878
ATN
Atanga
95 %
AtangaPopulation Served 11,657
AWR
Awere
95 %
AwerePopulation Served 8,095
BO
Bongtiko
72 %
BongtikoPopulation Served 11,400
LGT
Laguti
95 %
LagutiPopulation Served 9,174
LPL
Lapul
95 %
LapulPopulation Served 7,878
LTN
Latanya
95 %
LatanyaPopulation Served 17,053
LY
Lunyiri
88 %
LunyiriPopulation Served 15,224
OGM
Ogom
95 %
OgomPopulation Served 2,806
PAI
Paiula
95 %
PaiulaPopulation Served 9,066
PDR
Pader
95 %
PaderPopulation Served 10,685
PJL
Pajule
95 %
PajulePopulation Served 6,907
PJT
Pajule Town Council
NWSC
Pajule Town CouncilPopulation Served NWSC
PRN
Puranga
95 %
PurangaPopulation Served 11,224
PTC
Pader TC
NWSC
Pader TCPopulation Served NWSC
PUK
Pukor
95 %
PukorPopulation Served 7,987
TN
Tee-nam
95 %
Tee-namPopulation Served 7,123
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
78 %
Urban Functionality
85 %
ABR
Acholi Bur
70 %
Acholi BurFunctional Sources 62
AJ
Ajan
96 %
AjanFunctional Sources 69
ANG
Angangura
71 %
AnganguraFunctional Sources 62
ATC
Atanga TC
86 %
Atanga TCFunctional Sources 56
ATN
Atanga
87 %
AtangaFunctional Sources 54
AWR
Awere
94 %
AwereFunctional Sources 48
BO
Bongtiko
63 %
BongtikoFunctional Sources 24
LGT
Laguti
92 %
LagutiFunctional Sources 55
LPL
Lapul
64 %
LapulFunctional Sources 28
LTN
Latanya
69 %
LatanyaFunctional Sources 97
LY
Lunyiri
71 %
LunyiriFunctional Sources 40
OGM
Ogom
87 %
OgomFunctional Sources 41
PAI
Paiula
83 %
PaiulaFunctional Sources 58
PDR
Pader
90 %
PaderFunctional Sources 65
PJL
Pajule
80 %
PajuleFunctional Sources 53
PJT
Pajule Town Council
NWSC
Pajule Town CouncilFunctional Sources 31
PRN
Puranga
70 %
PurangaFunctional Sources 42
PTC
Pader TC
NWSC
Pader TCFunctional Sources 104
PUK
Pukor
84 %
PukorFunctional Sources 37
TN
Tee-nam
68 %
Tee-namFunctional Sources 46
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | ARUU | ||||||||
| 1 Pader | Rural | 11,247 | 10,685 | 95% | 90% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 63 | 7 | 70 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Paiula | Rural | 9,543 | 9,066 | 95% | 83% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | 5 | 5 | 56 | 4 | 60 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Lunyiri | Rural | 17,269 | 15,224 | 88% | 71% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 3 | - | 3 | 32 | 13 | 45 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Atanga TC | Urban | 8,293 | 7,878 | 95% | - | 86% | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 54 | 4 | 58 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Pajule | Rural | 7,271 | 6,907 | 95% | 80% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 52 | 10 | 62 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Ogom | Rural | 2,954 | 2,806 | 95% | 87% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 40 | - | 40 | - | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Acholi Bur | Rural | 16,700 | 15,865 | 95% | 70% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 59 | 22 | 81 | 1 | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Latanya | Rural | 17,950 | 17,053 | 95% | 69% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 4 | 96 | 37 | 133 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Lapul | Rural | 8,293 | 7,878 | 95% | 64% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | 16 | 44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Puranga | Rural | 11,815 | 11,224 | 95% | 70% | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 9 | 40 | 4 | 6 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Atanga | Rural | 12,270 | 11,657 | 95% | 87% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 53 | 8 | 61 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Tee-nam | Rural | 7,498 | 7,123 | 95% | 68% | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 15 | 52 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Awere | Rural | 8,521 | 8,095 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 3 | - | 3 | 42 | 2 | 44 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Pukor | Rural | 8,407 | 7,987 | 95% | 84% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 35 | 2 | 37 | 2 | 2 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 15 Ajan | Rural | 8,180 | 7,771 | 95% | 96% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 66 | 3 | 69 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 16 Bongtiko | Rural | 15,792 | 11,400 | 72% | 63% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 12 | 35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 17 Angangura | Rural | 10,679 | 10,145 | 95% | 71% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 58 | 25 | 83 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 18 Pader TC | Urban | 15,905 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 92% | 100% | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 67 | 8 | 75 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 29 | - | 29 | - | - | - | Yes |
| 19 Pajule Town Council | Urban | 13,406 | NWSC | NWSC | - | 65% | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 9 | 39 | - | 7 | 7 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 20 Laguti | Rural | 9,657 | 9,174 | 95% | 92% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 51 | 1 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 221,650 | 205,391 | 93 | 78 | 85 | 50 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 28 | 22 | 50 | 973 | 207 | 1,180 | 16 | 39 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 221,650 | 205,391 | 93 | 78 | 85 | 50 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 28 | 22 | 50 | 973 | 207 | 1,180 | 16 | 39 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 7 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown/Not GFS | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 26 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 15 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee