Amuru District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Amuru vary from 65 % in Amuru TC Sub-County to 95 % in Atiak Sub-County. Amuru has 798 domestic water points which serve a total of 198,929 people – 191,317 in rural areas. 199 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Amuru has 2 piped schemes.
Access
85%
Rural Functionality
75%
Equity
50
Management
82%
Gender
82%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 44
Population 37
Population 87
Population 163
Population 169
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 41,586
Population Served 7,612
Population Served 41,119
Population Served 55,420
Population Served 53,192
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 41,586
Population Served 7,612
Population Served 41,119
Population Served 55,420
Population Served 53,192
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 114
Functional Sources 21
Functional Sources 136
Functional Sources 187
Functional Sources 140
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | KILAK | ||||||||
| 1 Amuru TC | Urban | 11,644 | 7,612 | 65% | - | 76% | - | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Pabo | Rural | 68,570 | 53,192 | 78% | 70% | - | - | 15 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 3 | 20 | 105 | 23 | 128 | 3 | 4 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 9 | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Atiak | Rural | 43,283 | 41,119 | 95% | 80% | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 131 | 16 | 147 | 4 | 1 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Amuru | Rural | 53,280 | 41,586 | 78% | 77% | - | - | 24 | - | 24 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 63 | 23 | 86 | 4 | 3 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | 5 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Lamogi | Rural | 58,337 | 55,420 | 95% | 75% | - | - | 81 | 2 | 83 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 89 | 37 | 126 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 12 | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 235,114 | 198,929 | 85 | 75 | 76 | 0 | 123 | 10 | 133 | 40 | 42 | 82 | 422 | 112 | 534 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 235,114 | 198,929 | 85 | 75 | 76 | 0 | 123 | 10 | 133 | 40 | 42 | 82 | 422 | 112 | 534 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Unknown/Not GFS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Surface Water Based/Not GFS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee