Kibuku District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Kibuku vary from 41 % in Kibuku TC Sub-County to 95 % in Tirinyi Sub-County. Kibuku has 583 domestic water points which serve a total of 164,493 people – 159,769 in rural areas. 49 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kibuku has 1 piped schemes.
Access
66%
Rural Functionality
92%
Equity
97
Management
95%
Gender
92%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 265
Population 262
Population 688
Population 282
Population 341
Population 294
Population 357
Population 0
Population 0
Population 0
Population 251
Population 710
Population 0
Population 813
Population 0
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 17,042
Population Served 6,900
Population Served 12,300
Population Served 12,300
Population Served 12,006
Population Served 13,751
Population Served 9,300
Population Served 8,106
Population Served 9,600
Population Served 4,724
Population Served 6,600
Population Served 10,512
Population Served 10,200
Population Served 6,000
Population Served 25,151
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 17,042
Population Served 6,900
Population Served 12,300
Population Served 12,300
Population Served 12,006
Population Served 13,751
Population Served 9,300
Population Served 8,106
Population Served 9,600
Population Served 4,724
Population Served 6,600
Population Served 10,512
Population Served 10,200
Population Served 6,000
Population Served 25,151
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 85
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 37
Functional Sources 36
Functional Sources 35
Functional Sources 46
Functional Sources 29
Functional Sources 23
Functional Sources 28
Functional Sources 20
Functional Sources 19
Functional Sources 29
Functional Sources 27
Functional Sources 16
Functional Sources 40
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | KIBUKU | ||||||||
| 1 Goligoli | Rural | 21,279 | 12,300 | 58% | 93% | - | - | 8 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 1 | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Kabweri | Rural | 21,032 | 12,006 | 57% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Buseta | Rural | 11,258 | 6,900 | 61% | 96% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 19 | 1 | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Nankondo | Rural | 13,238 | 6,000 | 45% | 85% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 1 | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Tirinyi | Rural | 26,475 | 25,151 | 95% | 73% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 5 | 40 | 2 | 5 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | 795 | 330 | 34 | No |
| 6 Lwatama | Rural | 16,207 | 10,512 | 65% | 86% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 30 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kibuku TC | Urban | 11,629 | 4,724 | 41% | - | 91% | - | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | - | 3 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Nabiswa | Rural | 18,681 | 10,200 | 55% | 88% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 24 | 4 | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Kituti | Rural | 11,629 | 6,600 | 57% | 91% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 16 | 2 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 10 Kagumu | Rural | 16,331 | 9,300 | 57% | 97% | - | - | 9 | - | 9 | 1 | - | 1 | 19 | 1 | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 11 Bulangira | Rural | 17,939 | 17,042 | 95% | 98% | - | - | 21 | - | 21 | 5 | - | 5 | 59 | 2 | 61 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 12 Kadama | Rural | 14,475 | 13,751 | 95% | 96% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 45 | 2 | 47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 13 Kibuku | Rural | 17,197 | 12,300 | 72% | 93% | - | 100% | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 35 | 2 | 37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 14 Kasasira | Rural | 17,444 | 9,600 | 55% | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 26 | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 15 Kirika | Rural | 13,609 | 8,106 | 60% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 19 | 2 | 21 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 248,423 | 164,493 | 66 | 92 | 91 | 100 | 41 | 1 | 42 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 450 | 28 | 478 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 795 | 330 | 34 | No | |
| District | 248,423 | 164,493 | 66 | 92 | 91 | 100 | 41 | 1 | 42 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 450 | 28 | 478 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 795 | 330 | 34 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee