Kamuli District
by July 26, 2024
The access rates in Kamuli vary from 3 % in Kisozi TC Sub-County to 95 % in Wankole Sub-County. Kamuli has 1,930 domestic water points which serve a total of 533,200 people – 454,001 in rural areas. 196 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kamuli has 2 piped schemes.
Access
79%
Rural Functionality
90%
Equity
48
Management
90%
Gender
89%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
KTC
Northern Div
10,624
Northern DivPopulation 10,624
BTC
Balawoli TC
Unknown
Balawoli TCPopulation 0
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation 0
KTC
Kisozi TC
Unknown
Kisozi TCPopulation 0
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
Unknown
Mbulamuti TCPopulation 0
NTC
Namwendwa TC
Unknown
Namwendwa TCPopulation 0
NWT
Nawanyago TC
Unknown
Nawanyago TCPopulation 0
STD
Southern Div
Unknown
Southern DivPopulation 0
NMS
Namasagali
237
NamasagaliPopulation 237
NBW
Nabwigulu
204
NabwiguluPopulation 204
WNK
Wankole
488
WankolePopulation 488
NWN
Nawanyago
476
NawanyagoPopulation 476
MBL
Mbulamuti
410
MbulamutiPopulation 410
KSZ
Kisozi
275
KisoziPopulation 275
BLW
Balawoli
80
BalawoliPopulation 80
BGL
Bugulumbya
567
BugulumbyaPopulation 567
BLP
Bulopa
773
BulopaPopulation 773
NMW
Namwendwa
485
NamwendwaPopulation 485
KGB
Kagumba
Unknown
KagumbaPopulation 0
MGG
Magogo
Unknown
MagogoPopulation 0
KTY
Kitayunjwa
375
KitayunjwaPopulation 375
BTN
Butansi
384
ButansiPopulation 384
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
79 %
Rural Access
85 %
Urban Access
57 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
95 %
BugulumbyaPopulation Served 43,371
BLP
Bulopa
81 %
BulopaPopulation Served 29,262
BLW
Balawoli
91 %
BalawoliPopulation Served 25,148
BTC
Balawoli TC
72 %
Balawoli TCPopulation Served 5,100
BTN
Butansi
95 %
ButansiPopulation Served 35,302
KGB
Kagumba
70 %
KagumbaPopulation Served 28,545
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation Served Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
74 %
KisoziPopulation Served 23,900
KTC
Northern Div
95 %
Northern DivPopulation Served 36,199
KTC
Kisozi TC
3 %
Kisozi TCPopulation Served 300
KTY
Kitayunjwa
95 %
KitayunjwaPopulation Served 47,853
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiPopulation Served NWSC
MGG
Magogo
86 %
MagogoPopulation Served 23,806
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
28 %
Mbulamuti TCPopulation Served 3,950
NBW
Nabwigulu
77 %
NabwiguluPopulation Served 21,300
NMS
Namasagali
77 %
NamasagaliPopulation Served 36,495
NMW
Namwendwa
73 %
NamwendwaPopulation Served 52,560
NTC
Namwendwa TC
33 %
Namwendwa TCPopulation Served 3,300
NWN
Nawanyago
95 %
NawanyagoPopulation Served 28,466
NWT
Nawanyago TC
29 %
Nawanyago TCPopulation Served 3,300
STD
Southern Div
75 %
Southern DivPopulation Served 27,050
WNK
Wankole
95 %
WankolePopulation Served 23,871
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
79 %
Rural Access
85 %
Urban Access
57 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
95 %
BugulumbyaPopulation Served 43,371
BLP
Bulopa
81 %
BulopaPopulation Served 29,262
BLW
Balawoli
91 %
BalawoliPopulation Served 25,148
BTC
Balawoli TC
72 %
Balawoli TCPopulation Served 5,100
BTN
Butansi
95 %
ButansiPopulation Served 35,302
KGB
Kagumba
70 %
KagumbaPopulation Served 28,545
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation Served Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
74 %
KisoziPopulation Served 23,900
KTC
Northern Div
95 %
Northern DivPopulation Served 36,199
KTC
Kisozi TC
3 %
Kisozi TCPopulation Served 300
KTY
Kitayunjwa
95 %
KitayunjwaPopulation Served 47,853
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiPopulation Served NWSC
MGG
Magogo
86 %
MagogoPopulation Served 23,806
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
28 %
Mbulamuti TCPopulation Served 3,950
NBW
Nabwigulu
77 %
NabwiguluPopulation Served 21,300
NMS
Namasagali
77 %
NamasagaliPopulation Served 36,495
NMW
Namwendwa
73 %
NamwendwaPopulation Served 52,560
NTC
Namwendwa TC
33 %
Namwendwa TCPopulation Served 3,300
NWN
Nawanyago
95 %
NawanyagoPopulation Served 28,466
NWT
Nawanyago TC
29 %
Nawanyago TCPopulation Served 3,300
STD
Southern Div
75 %
Southern DivPopulation Served 27,050
WNK
Wankole
95 %
WankolePopulation Served 23,871
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
90 %
Urban Functionality
89 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
87 %
BugulumbyaFunctional Sources 132
BLP
Bulopa
92 %
BulopaFunctional Sources 93
BLW
Balawoli
91 %
BalawoliFunctional Sources 85
BTC
Balawoli TC
94 %
Balawoli TCFunctional Sources 16
BTN
Butansi
82 %
ButansiFunctional Sources 111
KGB
Kagumba
93 %
KagumbaFunctional Sources 97
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCFunctional Sources Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
90 %
KisoziFunctional Sources 72
KTC
Northern Div
87 %
Northern DivFunctional Sources 82
KTC
Kisozi TC
100 %
Kisozi TCFunctional Sources 1
KTY
Kitayunjwa
94 %
KitayunjwaFunctional Sources 187
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiFunctional Sources 105
MGG
Magogo
91 %
MagogoFunctional Sources 78
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
86 %
Mbulamuti TCFunctional Sources 19
NBW
Nabwigulu
93 %
NabwiguluFunctional Sources 66
NMS
Namasagali
91 %
NamasagaliFunctional Sources 129
NMW
Namwendwa
86 %
NamwendwaFunctional Sources 148
NTC
Namwendwa TC
83 %
Namwendwa TCFunctional Sources 10
NWN
Nawanyago
94 %
NawanyagoFunctional Sources 101
NWT
Nawanyago TC
100 %
Nawanyago TCFunctional Sources 11
STD
Southern Div
89 %
Southern DivFunctional Sources 84
WNK
Wankole
91 %
WankoleFunctional Sources 107
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUGABULA | ||||||||
| 1 Namasagali | Rural | 47,187 | 36,495 | 77% | 91% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 106 | 6 | 112 | 8 | 3 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 4 | 19 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Balawoli TC | Urban | 7,052 | 5,100 | 72% | - | 94% | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 12 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Balawoli | Rural | 27,604 | 25,148 | 91% | 91% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | 72 | 4 | 76 | 5 | 4 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Nabwigulu | Rural | 27,604 | 21,300 | 77% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | 63 | 4 | 67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Kagumba | Rural | 40,581 | 28,545 | 70% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 91 | 3 | 94 | 5 | 4 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | No |
| 6 Bulopa | Rural | 36,334 | 29,262 | 81% | 92% | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 5 | 49 | 44 | 3 | 47 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Namwendwa TC | Urban | 9,894 | 3,300 | 33% | - | 83% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Kitayunjwa | Rural | 50,372 | 47,853 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 79 | 6 | 85 | 105 | 4 | 109 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Namwendwa | Rural | 72,432 | 52,560 | 73% | 86% | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 9 | 44 | 108 | 12 | 120 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | 263 | 7 | 24 | No |
| 10 Butansi | Rural | 37,160 | 35,302 | 95% | 82% | - | - | - | - | - | 23 | 9 | 32 | 84 | 11 | 95 | 4 | 4 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 356,220 | 284,864 | 80 | 90 | 87 | 100 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 226 | 38 | 264 | 779 | 54 | 833 | 30 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 12 | 45 | 1,490 | 51 | 78 | No | BUZAAYA |
| 1 Nawanyago TC | Urban | 11,578 | 3,300 | 29% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Wankole | Rural | 25,127 | 23,871 | 95% | 91% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 70 | 7 | 77 | 34 | 4 | 38 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Kisozi TC | Urban | 10,420 | 300 | 3% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Kisozi | Rural | 32,205 | 23,900 | 74% | 90% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 31 | 6 | 37 | 40 | 2 | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Nawanyago | Rural | 29,964 | 28,466 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 43 | 4 | 47 | 51 | 2 | 53 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Mbulamuti TC | Urban | 13,999 | 3,950 | 28% | - | 86% | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 2 | 17 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Magogo | Rural | 27,722 | 23,806 | 86% | 91% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 46 | 2 | 48 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 8 | - | 8 | No |
| 8 Bugulumbya | Rural | 45,654 | 43,371 | 95% | 87% | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | 9 | 81 | 53 | 7 | 60 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 2 | 9 | 577 | 9 | 14 | No |
| 9 Mbulamuti | Rural | 37,160 | NWSC | NWSC | 88% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 39 | 7 | 46 | 61 | 4 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 10 Kasambira TC | Urban | 11,999 | 0 | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 245,828 | 185,087 | 75 | 90 | 91 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 285 | 40 | 325 | 289 | 21 | 310 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 36 | 585 | 9 | 22 | No | Kamuli MC |
| 1 Southern Div | Urban | 36,098 | 27,050 | 75% | - | 89% | - | 1 | - | 1 | 22 | 6 | 28 | 54 | 4 | 58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Northern Div | Urban | 38,104 | 36,199 | 95% | - | 87% | 100% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 23 | 43 | 2 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 1,226 | 44 | 54 | No |
| Total | 74,202 | 63,249 | 85 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 676,250 | 533,200 | 79 | 90 | 89 | 100 | 21 | 2 | 23 | 524 | 79 | 603 | 1,080 | 75 | 1,155 | 38 | 24 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 71 | 16 | 87 | 2,237 | 62 | 107 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Unknown/Not GFS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee