Kamuli District

by December 2, 2024

The access rates in Kamuli vary from 3 % in Kisozi TC Sub-County to 95 % in Wankole Sub-County. Kamuli has 1,930 domestic water points which serve a total of 534,786 people – 455,322 in rural areas. 196 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kamuli has 2 piped schemes.

Access

78^%

Rural Functionality

90^%

Equity

49

Management

90^%

Gender

89^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

KTC Northern Div 10,703

BTC Balawoli TC Unknown

KST Kasambira TC Unknown

KTC Kisozi TC Unknown

MTC Mbulamuti TC Unknown

NTC Namwendwa TC Unknown

NWT Nawanyago TC Unknown

STD Southern Div Unknown

NMS Namasagali 238

NBW Nabwigulu 205

WNK Wankole 492

NWN Nawanyago 480

MBL Mbulamuti 413

KSZ Kisozi 277

BLW Balawoli 80

BGL Bugulumbya 572

BLP Bulopa 778

NMW Namwendwa 489

KGB Kagumba Unknown

MGG Magogo Unknown

KTY Kitayunjwa 378

BTN Butansi 387

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 78 %

Rural Access 84 %

Urban Access 57 %

BGL Bugulumbya 95 %

BLP Bulopa 80 %

BLW Balawoli 90 %

BTC Balawoli TC 72 %

BTN Butansi 95 %

KGB Kagumba 70 %

KST Kasambira TC Unknown

KSZ Kisozi 74 %

KTC Northern Div 95 %

KTC Kisozi TC 3 %

KTY Kitayunjwa 95 %

MBL Mbulamuti NWSC

MGG Magogo 85 %

MTC Mbulamuti TC 28 %

NBW Nabwigulu 77 %

NMS Namasagali 77 %

NMW Namwendwa 72 %

NTC Namwendwa TC 33 %

NWN Nawanyago 95 %

NWT Nawanyago TC 28 %

STD Southern Div 74 %

WNK Wankole 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 78 %

Rural Access 84 %

Urban Access 57 %

BGL Bugulumbya 95 %

BLP Bulopa 80 %

BLW Balawoli 90 %

BTC Balawoli TC 72 %

BTN Butansi 95 %

KGB Kagumba 70 %

KST Kasambira TC Unknown

KSZ Kisozi 74 %

KTC Northern Div 95 %

KTC Kisozi TC 3 %

KTY Kitayunjwa 95 %

MBL Mbulamuti NWSC

MGG Magogo 85 %

MTC Mbulamuti TC 28 %

NBW Nabwigulu 77 %

NMS Namasagali 77 %

NMW Namwendwa 72 %

NTC Namwendwa TC 33 %

NWN Nawanyago 95 %

NWT Nawanyago TC 28 %

STD Southern Div 74 %

WNK Wankole 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 90 %

Urban Functionality 89 %

BGL Bugulumbya 87 %

BLP Bulopa 92 %

BLW Balawoli 91 %

BTC Balawoli TC 94 %

BTN Butansi 82 %

KGB Kagumba 93 %

KST Kasambira TC Unknown

KSZ Kisozi 90 %

KTC Northern Div 87 %

KTC Kisozi TC 100 %

KTY Kitayunjwa 94 %

MBL Mbulamuti NWSC

MGG Magogo 91 %

MTC Mbulamuti TC 86 %

NBW Nabwigulu 93 %

NMS Namasagali 91 %

NMW Namwendwa 86 %

NTC Namwendwa TC 83 %

NWN Nawanyago 94 %

NWT Nawanyago TC 100 %

STD Southern Div 89 %

WNK Wankole 91 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
BUGABULA
1 Balawoli TC	Urban	7,110	5,100	72%	-	94%	-	-	-	-	4	-	4	12	1	13	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Balawoli	Rural	27,808	25,148	90%	91%	-	-	1	-	1	7	-	7	72	4	76	5	4	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Bulopa	Rural	36,602	29,262	80%	92%	-	-	-	-	-	44	5	49	44	3	47	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	3	-	-	-	No
4 Kitayunjwa	Rural	50,744	48,207	95%	94%	-	-	2	-	2	79	6	85	105	4	109	1	1	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	-	-	-	No
5 Namasagali	Rural	47,535	36,495	77%	91%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	106	6	112	8	3	11	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	4	19	-	-	-	No
6 Nabwigulu	Rural	27,808	21,300	77%	93%	-	-	-	-	-	3	1	4	63	4	67	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Kagumba	Rural	40,880	28,545	70%	93%	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	91	3	94	5	4	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	No
8 Namwendwa TC	Urban	9,976	3,300	33%	-	83%	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	9	-	9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	1	2	-	-	-	No
9 Namwendwa	Rural	72,966	52,560	72%	86%	-	-	-	-	-	35	9	44	108	12	120	-	3	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	1	6	263	7	24	No
10 Butansi	Rural	37,434	35,562	95%	82%	-	-	-	-	-	23	9	32	84	11	95	4	4	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		358,863	285,478	80	90	87	100	9	2	11	226	38	264	779	54	833	30	20	50	0	0	0	1	0	1	33	12	45	1,490	51	78	No
BUZAAYA
1 Nawanyago TC	Urban	11,674	3,300	28%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	10	-	10	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
2 Wankole	Rural	25,312	24,046	95%	91%	-	-	2	-	2	70	7	77	34	4	38	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Kisozi TC	Urban	10,506	300	3%	-	100%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Mbulamuti TC	Urban	14,114	3,950	28%	-	86%	-	1	-	1	1	1	2	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	2	17	-	-	-	No
5 Kisozi	Rural	32,443	23,900	74%	90%	-	-	1	-	1	31	6	37	40	2	42	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
6 Nawanyago	Rural	30,185	28,676	95%	94%	-	-	2	-	2	43	4	47	51	2	53	5	-	5	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Magogo	Rural	27,927	23,806	85%	91%	-	-	2	-	2	19	6	25	46	2	48	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	10	8	-	8	No
8 Bugulumbya	Rural	45,990	43,691	95%	87%	-	-	-	-	-	72	9	81	53	7	60	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	2	9	577	9	14	No
9 Mbulamuti	Rural	37,434	NWSC	NWSC	88%	-	-	4	-	4	39	7	46	61	4	65	1	3	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
10 Kasambira TC	Urban	12,098	0	0%	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		247,683	185,793	75	90	91	0	12	0	12	285	40	325	289	21	310	8	4	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	32	4	36	585	9	22	No
Kamuli MC
1 Southern Div	Urban	36,364	27,050	74%	-	89%	-	1	-	1	22	6	28	54	4	58	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	7	-	-	-	No
2 Northern Div	Urban	38,385	36,466	95%	-	87%	100%	5	2	7	21	2	23	43	2	45	5	1	6	-	-	-	1	-	1	8	5	13	1,226	44	54	No
Total		74,749	63,515	85	0	97	0	0	0	0	13	1	14	12	0	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	0	6	0	0	0	No
District		681,295	534,786	78	90	89	100	21	2	23	524	79	603	1,080	75	1,155	38	24	62	0	0	0	1	0	1	71	16	87	2,237	62	107	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Unknown/Not GFS	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
Groundwater based/Unknown	4	4	0	0	1	3	0	0	0	2	1
Groundwater based/Not GFS	3	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0
Total	9	8	0	0	0	3	0	2	1	2	1

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

78%

90%

49

90%

89%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

78^%

90^%

90^%

89^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population