Kamuli District
by March 30, 2025
The access rates in Kamuli vary from 3 % in Kisozi TC Sub-County to 95 % in Wankole Sub-County. Kamuli has 1,929 domestic water points which serve a total of 536,135 people – 456,567 in rural areas. 195 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Kamuli has 2 piped schemes.
Access
78%
Rural Functionality
90%
Equity
49
Management
90%
Gender
89%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
BTC
Balawoli TC
Unknown
Balawoli TCPopulation 0
KTC
Kisozi TC
Unknown
Kisozi TCPopulation 0
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
Unknown
Mbulamuti TCPopulation 0
NTC
Namwendwa TC
Unknown
Namwendwa TCPopulation 0
NWT
Nawanyago TC
Unknown
Nawanyago TCPopulation 0
STD
Southern Div
Unknown
Southern DivPopulation 0
NBW
Nabwigulu
207
NabwiguluPopulation 207
NMS
Namasagali
240
NamasagaliPopulation 240
BLW
Balawoli
81
BalawoliPopulation 81
KGB
Kagumba
Unknown
KagumbaPopulation 0
MGG
Magogo
Unknown
MagogoPopulation 0
KTY
Kitayunjwa
380
KitayunjwaPopulation 380
BTN
Butansi
390
ButansiPopulation 390
KTC
Northern Div
10,777
Northern DivPopulation 10,777
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation 0
WNK
Wankole
495
WankolePopulation 495
NWN
Nawanyago
483
NawanyagoPopulation 483
MBL
Mbulamuti
416
MbulamutiPopulation 416
KSZ
Kisozi
279
KisoziPopulation 279
BGL
Bugulumbya
575
BugulumbyaPopulation 575
BLP
Bulopa
784
BulopaPopulation 784
NMW
Namwendwa
492
NamwendwaPopulation 492
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
78 %
Rural Access
84 %
Urban Access
56 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
95 %
BugulumbyaPopulation Served 43,993
BLP
Bulopa
79 %
BulopaPopulation Served 29,262
BLW
Balawoli
90 %
BalawoliPopulation Served 25,148
BTC
Balawoli TC
71 %
Balawoli TCPopulation Served 5,100
BTN
Butansi
95 %
ButansiPopulation Served 35,808
KGB
Kagumba
69 %
KagumbaPopulation Served 28,545
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation Served Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
73 %
KisoziPopulation Served 23,900
KTC
Northern Div
95 %
Northern DivPopulation Served 36,718
KTC
Kisozi TC
3 %
Kisozi TCPopulation Served 300
KTY
Kitayunjwa
95 %
KitayunjwaPopulation Served 48,539
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiPopulation Served NWSC
MGG
Magogo
85 %
MagogoPopulation Served 23,806
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
28 %
Mbulamuti TCPopulation Served 3,950
NBW
Nabwigulu
76 %
NabwiguluPopulation Served 21,300
NMS
Namasagali
76 %
NamasagaliPopulation Served 36,495
NMW
Namwendwa
72 %
NamwendwaPopulation Served 52,560
NTC
Namwendwa TC
31 %
Namwendwa TCPopulation Served 3,150
NWN
Nawanyago
95 %
NawanyagoPopulation Served 28,873
NWT
Nawanyago TC
28 %
Nawanyago TCPopulation Served 3,300
STD
Southern Div
74 %
Southern DivPopulation Served 27,050
WNK
Wankole
95 %
WankolePopulation Served 24,213
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Total Access
78 %
Rural Access
84 %
Urban Access
56 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
95 %
BugulumbyaPopulation Served 43,993
BLP
Bulopa
79 %
BulopaPopulation Served 29,262
BLW
Balawoli
90 %
BalawoliPopulation Served 25,148
BTC
Balawoli TC
71 %
Balawoli TCPopulation Served 5,100
BTN
Butansi
95 %
ButansiPopulation Served 35,808
KGB
Kagumba
69 %
KagumbaPopulation Served 28,545
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCPopulation Served Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
73 %
KisoziPopulation Served 23,900
KTC
Northern Div
95 %
Northern DivPopulation Served 36,718
KTC
Kisozi TC
3 %
Kisozi TCPopulation Served 300
KTY
Kitayunjwa
95 %
KitayunjwaPopulation Served 48,539
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiPopulation Served NWSC
MGG
Magogo
85 %
MagogoPopulation Served 23,806
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
28 %
Mbulamuti TCPopulation Served 3,950
NBW
Nabwigulu
76 %
NabwiguluPopulation Served 21,300
NMS
Namasagali
76 %
NamasagaliPopulation Served 36,495
NMW
Namwendwa
72 %
NamwendwaPopulation Served 52,560
NTC
Namwendwa TC
31 %
Namwendwa TCPopulation Served 3,150
NWN
Nawanyago
95 %
NawanyagoPopulation Served 28,873
NWT
Nawanyago TC
28 %
Nawanyago TCPopulation Served 3,300
STD
Southern Div
74 %
Southern DivPopulation Served 27,050
WNK
Wankole
95 %
WankolePopulation Served 24,213
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Rural Functionality
90 %
Urban Functionality
89 %
BGL
Bugulumbya
87 %
BugulumbyaFunctional Sources 132
BLP
Bulopa
92 %
BulopaFunctional Sources 93
BLW
Balawoli
91 %
BalawoliFunctional Sources 85
BTC
Balawoli TC
94 %
Balawoli TCFunctional Sources 16
BTN
Butansi
82 %
ButansiFunctional Sources 111
KGB
Kagumba
93 %
KagumbaFunctional Sources 97
KST
Kasambira TC
Unknown
Kasambira TCFunctional Sources Unknown
KSZ
Kisozi
90 %
KisoziFunctional Sources 72
KTC
Northern Div
87 %
Northern DivFunctional Sources 82
KTC
Kisozi TC
100 %
Kisozi TCFunctional Sources 1
KTY
Kitayunjwa
94 %
KitayunjwaFunctional Sources 187
MBL
Mbulamuti
NWSC
MbulamutiFunctional Sources 105
MGG
Magogo
91 %
MagogoFunctional Sources 78
MTC
Mbulamuti TC
86 %
Mbulamuti TCFunctional Sources 19
NBW
Nabwigulu
93 %
NabwiguluFunctional Sources 66
NMS
Namasagali
91 %
NamasagaliFunctional Sources 129
NMW
Namwendwa
86 %
NamwendwaFunctional Sources 148
NTC
Namwendwa TC
91 %
Namwendwa TCFunctional Sources 10
NWN
Nawanyago
94 %
NawanyagoFunctional Sources 101
NWT
Nawanyago TC
100 %
Nawanyago TCFunctional Sources 11
STD
Southern Div
89 %
Southern DivFunctional Sources 84
WNK
Wankole
91 %
WankoleFunctional Sources 107
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | BUGABULA | ||||||||
| 1 Balawoli TC | Urban | 7,165 | 5,100 | 71% | - | 94% | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 12 | 1 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Balawoli | Rural | 28,000 | 25,148 | 90% | 91% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | 7 | 72 | 4 | 76 | 5 | 4 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Bulopa | Rural | 36,855 | 29,262 | 79% | 92% | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 5 | 49 | 44 | 3 | 47 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Kitayunjwa | Rural | 51,094 | 48,539 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 79 | 6 | 85 | 105 | 4 | 109 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Namasagali | Rural | 47,864 | 36,495 | 76% | 91% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 106 | 6 | 112 | 8 | 3 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 4 | 19 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Nabwigulu | Rural | 28,000 | 21,300 | 76% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 4 | 63 | 4 | 67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Kagumba | Rural | 41,163 | 28,545 | 69% | 93% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 91 | 3 | 94 | 5 | 4 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | No |
| 8 Namwendwa TC | Urban | 10,053 | 3,150 | 31% | - | 91% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 9 | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | No |
| 9 Namwendwa | Rural | 73,471 | 52,560 | 72% | 86% | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 9 | 44 | 108 | 12 | 120 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | 263 | 7 | 24 | No |
| 10 Butansi | Rural | 37,693 | 35,808 | 95% | 82% | - | - | - | - | - | 23 | 9 | 32 | 84 | 11 | 95 | 4 | 4 | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 361,358 | 285,908 | 79 | 90 | 88 | 100 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 226 | 38 | 264 | 779 | 54 | 833 | 30 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | 44 | 1,490 | 51 | 78 | No | BUZAAYA |
| 1 Nawanyago TC | Urban | 11,764 | 3,300 | 28% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Wankole | Rural | 25,487 | 24,213 | 95% | 91% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 70 | 7 | 77 | 34 | 4 | 38 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Kisozi TC | Urban | 10,588 | 300 | 3% | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Mbulamuti TC | Urban | 14,224 | 3,950 | 28% | - | 86% | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 2 | 17 | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Kisozi | Rural | 32,667 | 23,900 | 73% | 90% | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 31 | 6 | 37 | 40 | 2 | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Nawanyago | Rural | 30,393 | 28,873 | 95% | 94% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 43 | 4 | 47 | 51 | 2 | 53 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Magogo | Rural | 28,120 | 23,806 | 85% | 91% | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 46 | 2 | 48 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 8 | - | 8 | No |
| 8 Bugulumbya | Rural | 46,308 | 43,993 | 95% | 87% | - | - | - | - | - | 72 | 9 | 81 | 53 | 7 | 60 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 2 | 9 | 577 | 9 | 14 | No |
| 9 Mbulamuti | Rural | 37,693 | NWSC | NWSC | 88% | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 39 | 7 | 46 | 61 | 4 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes |
| 10 Kasambira TC | Urban | 12,192 | 0 | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 249,436 | 186,459 | 75 | 90 | 91 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 285 | 40 | 325 | 289 | 21 | 310 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 36 | 585 | 9 | 22 | No | Kamuli MC |
| 1 Southern Div | Urban | 36,616 | 27,050 | 74% | - | 89% | - | 1 | - | 1 | 22 | 6 | 28 | 54 | 4 | 58 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Northern Div | Urban | 38,650 | 36,718 | 95% | - | 87% | 100% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 23 | 43 | 2 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 1,226 | 44 | 54 | No |
| Total | 75,266 | 63,768 | 85 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 686,060 | 536,135 | 78 | 90 | 89 | 100 | 21 | 2 | 23 | 524 | 79 | 603 | 1,080 | 75 | 1,155 | 38 | 24 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 71 | 15 | 86 | 2,237 | 62 | 107 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Unknown/Not GFS | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee