Serere District

by July 26, 2024

The access rates in Serere vary from 42 % in Kadungulu Sub-County to 95 % in Bugondo Sub-County. Serere has 1,101 domestic water points which serve a total of 307,841 people – 258,137 in rural areas. 98 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Serere has 2 piped schemes.

Access

62^%

Rural Functionality

93^%

Equity

102

Management

64^%

Gender

97^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population

50		250		1,000		2,000

	100		500		1,500

KTC Kasilo TC 474

KDT Kidetok TC Unknown

KYR Kyere 366

KTT Kateta 296

KDT Kadungulu TC Unknown

OLO Olio 334

PNG Pingire 193

Ocaapa Unknown

LBR Labori 242

Kagwara TC Unknown

Kyere Town Council Unknown

KDN Kadungulu 224

ATR Atiira 253

BGN Bugondo 229

STC Serere TC 511

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 62 %

Rural Access 68 %

Urban Access 41 %

Kagwara TC NWSC

Kyere Town Council NWSC

Ocaapa NWSC

ATR Atiira 86 %

BGN Bugondo 95 %

KDN Kadungulu 42 %

KDT Kadungulu TC 63 %

KDT Kidetok TC 95 %

KTC Kasilo TC 95 %

KTT Kateta 73 %

KYR Kyere 48 %

LBR Labori 70 %

OLO Olio 62 %

PNG Pingire 78 %

STC Serere TC 95 %

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 %		60 %

	40 %		80 %

Total Access 62 %

Rural Access 68 %

Urban Access 41 %

Kagwara TC NWSC

Kyere Town Council NWSC

Ocaapa NWSC

ATR Atiira 86 %

BGN Bugondo 95 %

KDN Kadungulu 42 %

KDT Kadungulu TC 63 %

KDT Kidetok TC 95 %

KTC Kasilo TC 95 %

KTT Kateta 73 %

KYR Kyere 48 %

LBR Labori 70 %

OLO Olio 62 %

PNG Pingire 78 %

STC Serere TC 95 %

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 %		80 %

	70 %		90 %

Rural Functionality 93 %

Urban Functionality 83 %

Kagwara TC NWSC

Kyere Town Council NWSC

Ocaapa NWSC

ATR Atiira 89 %

BGN Bugondo 95 %

KDN Kadungulu 91 %

KDT Kadungulu TC 89 %

KDT Kidetok TC 73 %

KTC Kasilo TC 79 %

KTT Kateta 92 %

KYR Kyere 92 %

LBR Labori 88 %

OLO Olio 100 %

PNG Pingire 92 %

STC Serere TC 78 %

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-County	Urban/ Rural	Population	Population Served	Access	Functionality			Point Water Sources																					Piped Water Systems
					Functionality			Protected springs			Shallow wells			Deep boreholes			Rainwater harvesting tanks			Dams			Valley tanks			PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands			YT	HH	IC	NWSC
					R	U	WfP	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	F	NF	Tot	YT	HH	IC	NWSC
KASILO
1 Kidetok TC	Urban	9,979	9,480	95%	-	73%	100%	2	3	5	4	1	5	23	5	28	1	2	3	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	12	No
2 Bugondo	Rural	50,537	48,010	95%	95%	-	100%	2	-	2	44	-	44	123	9	132	12	-	12	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	4	No
3 Pingire	Rural	39,278	30,806	78%	92%	-	-	1	-	1	45	4	49	49	4	53	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
4 Labori	Rural	28,403	19,818	70%	88%	-	-	-	-	-	23	3	26	37	3	40	1	2	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
5 Kasilo TC	Urban	4,990	4,741	95%	-	79%	-	2	-	2	4	2	6	7	2	9	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	51	2	8	No
Total		133,187	112,854	85	93	75	100	7	3	10	120	10	130	239	23	262	16	4	20	2	0	2	0	0	0	1	0	1	80	2	24	No
SERERE
1 Kyere Town Council	Urban	9,795	NWSC	NWSC	-	92%	-	2	-	2	4	2	6	15	-	15	2	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
2 Atiira	Rural	28,144	24,300	86%	89%	-	-	3	-	3	11	1	12	59	8	67	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
3 Serere TC	Urban	11,902	11,307	95%	-	78%	-	3	-	3	6	4	10	33	8	41	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	165	8	15	No
4 Kagwara TC	Urban	7,935	NWSC	NWSC	-	88%	-	-	-	-	9	1	10	9	2	11	3	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	1	-	-	-	Yes
5 Olio	Rural	49,345	30,742	62%	100%	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	16	81	-	81	1	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	141	6	16	No
6 Kadungulu	Rural	33,227	13,806	42%	91%	-	-	-	-	-	12	1	13	31	2	33	-	1	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
7 Kyere	Rural	73,645	35,624	48%	92%	-	-	11	2	13	23	5	28	80	2	82	3	1	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
8 Ocaapa	Urban	62,611	NWSC	NWSC	-	100%	-	1	-	1	3	-	3	6	-	6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes
9 Kateta	Rural	75,009	55,030	73%	92%	-	-	3	-	3	42	10	52	123	5	128	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	81	5	4	No
10 Kadungulu TC	Urban	12,770	8,100	63%	-	89%	-	-	-	-	2	2	4	22	1	23	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	No
Total		364,383	194,987	54	93	86	0	23	2	25	128	26	154	459	28	487	9	2	11	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	387	19	35	No
District		497,570	307,841	62	93	83	100	30	5	35	248	36	284	698	51	749	25	6	31	2	0	2	0	0	0	2	0	2	467	21	59	No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functionality of System			Type of Management					WB in place
Type of Scheme/GFS	Number of Schemes	Functional	Non-Functional	Partially Functional	Private Operator	WSC	Private/Individual	NWSC	Other	Yes	No
Groundwater based/Not GFS	2	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
Groundwater based/Unknown	4	4	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	4	0
Unknown/Not GFS	3	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	9	7	0	1	0	2	0	0	0	5	0

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee

62%

93%

102

64%

97%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

Access to Safe Water

Access to Safe Water

Functionality of Point Water Sources

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Piped Water Supply Systems

62^%

93^%

64^%

97^%

Population Density (people/km²) and Population