Otuke District
by September 29, 2023
The access rates in Otuke vary from 74 % in Ogwette Sub-County to 95 % in Adwari Sub-County. Otuke has 510 domestic water points which serve a total of 131,798 people – 123,310 in rural areas. 169 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Otuke has 1 piped schemes.
Access
88%
Rural Functionality
66%
Equity
45
Management
84%
Gender
73%
Population Density (people/km2) and Population
| 50 | 250 | 1,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 100 | 500 | 1,500 | |||||
Population 69
Population 120
Population 61
Population 94
Population 143
Population 194
Population 53
Population 131
Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 13,823
Population Served 16,855
Population Served 18,936
Population Served 16,206
Population Served 27,833
Population Served 17,856
Population Served 11,800
Population Served 8,488
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Access to Safe Water
| 20 % | 60 % | |||
| 40 % | 80 % | |||
Population Served 13,823
Population Served 16,855
Population Served 18,936
Population Served 16,206
Population Served 27,833
Population Served 17,856
Population Served 11,800
Population Served 8,488
Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.
Functionality of Point Water Sources
| 60 % | 80 % | |||
| 70 % | 90 % | |||
Functional Sources 39
Functional Sources 50
Functional Sources 59
Functional Sources 44
Functional Sources 69
Functional Sources 58
Functional Sources 38
Functional Sources 32
Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.
People served per technology
Reasons for non-functionality
Type of Management
Source of Funding
District Water Supply Summary
| Sub-County | Urban/ Rural | Population | Population Served | Access | Functionality | Point Water Sources | Piped Water Systems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protected springs | Shallow wells | Deep boreholes | Rainwater harvesting tanks | Dams | Valley tanks | PSP/Kiosk, Tap stands | YT | HH | IC | NWSC | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| R | U | WfP | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | F | NF | Tot | OTUKE | ||||||||
| 1 Okwang | Rural | 31,654 | 27,833 | 88% | 68% | - | 100% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 52 | 4 | 56 | 1 | 5 | 6 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | - | - | - | No |
| 2 Ogwette | Rural | 21,954 | 16,206 | 74% | 73% | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 44 | 7 | 51 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 3 Adwari | Rural | 14,551 | 13,823 | 95% | 67% | - | - | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 24 | 3 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 4 Ogor | Rural | 20,677 | 18,936 | 92% | 71% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | 5 | 64 | - | 6 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| 5 Otuke TC | Urban | 8,935 | 8,488 | 95% | - | 77% | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | 5 | 27 | 4 | 31 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 6 Alango | Rural | 17,742 | 16,855 | 95% | 47% | - | - | 3 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 39 | 2 | 41 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 7 Olilim | Rural | 19,529 | 17,856 | 91% | 74% | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 54 | 7 | 61 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | - | - | - | No |
| 8 Orum | Rural | 14,423 | 11,800 | 82% | 68% | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 1 | 38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | No |
| Total | 149,465 | 131,798 | 88 | 66 | 77 | 50 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 25 | 42 | 67 | 279 | 94 | 373 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
| District | 149,465 | 131,798 | 88 | 66 | 77 | 50 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 25 | 42 | 67 | 279 | 94 | 373 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | |
F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections
Piped Water Supply Systems
| Type of Scheme/GFS | Number of Schemes | Functionality of System | Type of Management | WB in place | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Non-Functional | Partially Functional | Private Operator | WSC | Private/Individual | NWSC | Other | Yes | No | ||
| Groundwater based/Not GFS | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Groundwater based/Unknown | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee